Superman Returns Official Rate and Review Superman Returns thread!!!

[ChrisBaleBatman]

Ebert said that about the X-Films?

I'm shocked.....for me, it was the other way around.

But, most of the time....Ebert seems to know what he's talking about.

 

[LadyVader]

If somebody bothered to make a fake you'd think they'd want to check the running time.

 

[Ita-KalEl]

Ebert doesn't seem an idiot.
Poland is an idiot

 

[Cmill216]

Oh noes! The Tomatometer has dropped all the way down to 82%!

Hide the children!!

 

[Thunder Emperor]

are we sure this is the real one.

 

[Ita-KalEl]

Oh noes! The Tomatometer has dropped all the way down to 82%!

Hide the children!!

It will raise again. There are 2-3 positive reviews made by legit critics to be added.

 

[Superman1]

John Williams was Credited at the begining of the movie, John Ottman's name came up, followed by John Williams

and the ending, is pretty much just like the originals except its updated.
and about 20 seconds into the credits they have the Dedication to Chris and Dana

 

[MoreCowbell]

Well, from what I found out....Ebert and Roper will have the review for Superman Returns airing next week.

Yeah, doesn't help much... Why wouldn't they have the review for it tonight?

 

[ChrisBaleBatman]

Just read that Slant review......wow...talk about offensive. That dude attacked Singer's sexual preference.

Other than that, I didn't understand anything that review said. It was alot of mindless jibber jabber and pretenious crap. The review made no sense.

 

[hitmanyr2k]

are we sure this is the real one.

The guy on Bluetights.net that scanned the 2 star review swears it's real...

I see Triligors made his way over there lol.

http://www.bluetights.net/theplanet/showpost.php?p=712478&postcount=1722

 

[Excel]

huh?

 

[Excel]

whats time is eberts tv show on

 

[ChrisBaleBatman]

Yeah, doesn't help much... Why wouldn't they have the review for it tonight?

That's exactly what I was wondering.

I dunno, maybe the film just doesn't need the support, since either way the film will still open huge.

Batman Begins, on the other hand, needed the positive feedback.....which, I remember, had the Ebert and Roper review about a week before it opened.

 

[TPS1000]

Think about it.
1. Ebert and Roeper give early reviews only when they are both thumbs up.
2. Ebert and Roeper are not giving an early review of SR.

 

[Thunder Emperor]

Think about it.
1. Ebert and Roeper give early reviews only when they are both thumbs up.
2. Ebert and Roeper are not giving an early review of SR.

yep that should tell you something

 

[Excel]

LOL hahahha

explode "bump" means your posting to bump the thread up in theforum so people can see it and update it.

 

[Captain Kirk]

Just read that Slant review......wow...talk about offensive. That dude attacked Singer's sexual preference.

Other than that, I didn't understand anything that review said. It was alot of mindless jibber jabber and pretenious crap. The review made no sense.

Yeah, it was really a waste of time to even read that junk. What a total tool!

 

[Excel]

vader youve seen it?http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showthread.php?t=237842

 

[ChrisBaleBatman]

I doubt that's true. I mean, what'd be the point if it were that obvious to figure out?

 

[charl_huntress]

Here's my deal...I am probably one of the few people who 'trust' Ebert. I remember watching him, Ebert and Siskel (sp), when I was younger. I always liked Ebert better, so I do listen to him. I usually check his reviews first on Yahoo when I'm deciding on a film.

Though, sometimes I just flat out disagree with him. Sometimes I think he has his own mind, and sometimes I think he's a studio pawn. So, if he did give it two stars I'd like to hear why, but I don't care if he liked it or not. It's not like it's going to stop me from seeing the movie.

At this point, I just can't believe that people are still giving fake reviews. The movie comes out soon. What's the point now?

 

[Excel]

gene siskel was good, i thought.

 

[ChrisBaleBatman]

Yeah, it was really a waste of time to even read that junk. What a total tool!

I was, honestly, surprised at the amount of homo-erotic undertones the review created out of thin air. I mean, he mentioned something about crotches....and the giant Daily Planet Globe ball when Superman had to catch it. Wtf?

Jibber jabber.

 

[Cinemaman]

BIGGEST

SCANDAL

EVER!!!

PIRATES FANS MNADE A FAKE EBERT REVIEW!!!

HERES THE REAL REVIEW!!!!

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e201/Clarkparker/ebertreview1.jpg

I knew this, but why they need this? I thought that we have battle with X-fans

 

[LadyVader]

I have a questions for anyone who saw the film

Spoiler

when Superman is on the plane with Lois and he has the kryptonite stuck in his back--does Jason react to it, seeing as though they are all on the plane together? also what was Jason's reaction when Luthor pulled out the kryptonite. Did he really look sick or was Luthor seeing things?

Spoiler

He looks at it but there little else reaction. When Lex first pulls it out the kid's eyes grow wide and he seems pretty scared. There is a reaction but you can't tell if he actually feels something else then fear. Then again, why would the kid be scared of something that basically looks like green glass or rock. I doubt his mom told him about Superman's weakness.

 

[Ita-KalEl]

yep that should tell you something

The theory that WB put under embargo only the "negative reviews" is typical of an hater like you.