CFlash
Sidekick
- Joined
- May 16, 2006
- Messages
- 3,583
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Orion Pax said:Sorry you see my example as "******ed" but Batman did appear a bit short in all movies where Michael Keaton played the role. Guess that whole camera angle thing wasn't used or didn't work. Personally, I didn't care how tall he was because it had NOTHING to do with the story. This is the point I'm trying to make. It's the character we fall in love with, not their design or their relation in height to those around them. The sad fact of the matter is this could be an incredible story and sci fi movie but people will still say, "Yeah it was a good movie but Bumblebee was still bigger than Jazz!" It just seams rediculous to me. My two cents.
Michael Keaton a bit short at 5"10'. Yeah... but did he really seem like a midget? Hugh Jackman a bit too tall... but did he really seem like the massive 6"3 he is in real life? No, in fact it otften seemed like the guy that played Cyclops was taller than him at 5"10.'
Bumblebee wasn't just a "NICE GUY".... that's pretty 2-dimensional don't you think??? TAKE A LOOK AT HIS SPECS. They're very important. He's weak and he's slow with zero firepower. It's not just that he's bigger in the movie. It's that he's also pretty badass. For instance, he hands Barricade's a** to him. That's is not Bumblebee. This is:

t: 
