Boom
I got nothin'
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2003
- Messages
- 54,808
- Reaction score
- 20,350
- Points
- 203
What the Legolas/Gimli friendship signified was the beginnings of a rekindled alliance between the elves and dwarves - an alliance that was effectively destroyed by the murder of Thingol. That's what gave it so much resonance. As Phantasm pointed out, Gimli was the only dwarf to sail across the sea to the Undying Lands. Even when the elves and dwarves were allies back in the old days, such a thing was unprecedented.
These two races did not like each other. Now, they could be amicable with one another if need be (Elrond was pleasant enough with the dwarves, and they to him), and Dain did honor Thorin's word in giving a portion of the treasure to Thranduil, but that doesn't change the fact that the dwarves and elves weren't so quick to join hands and be friends with one another.
During The Hobbit, the dwarves were, in their eyes, wrongfully imprisoned by the wood elves, and their tempers were all the more fueled when Bard brought the elves with him to the Gates of Erebor with the intention of procuring a portion of the treasure for them as payment for their aid to the people of Lake-town. So in addition to being wrongfully imprisoned (again, in their eyes), they now had to hand over treasure to those who wrongfully imprisoned them? To say that the situation was hostile is an understatement. Don't forget that the men/elves and the dwarves were about to start killing each other before Gandalf pointed out the arrival of the goblins and Wargs. Kili, being Thorin's fiercely loyal nephew, would have certainly stood in his uncle's defense - both against the imprisoning and the giving of treasure to the men/elves. If it came down to a battle between the men/elves and the dwarves, Kili would have killed them without hesitation. No question.
The animosity carries over to The Lord of the Rings. At the Council of Elrond, Gloin was quick to bring up the "wrongs" that the elves committed towards him and his twelve companions sixty years prior (despite it having nothing to do with the discussion at hand). And in Lothlorien, Haldir insisted that Gimli be blind-folded, while the other members of the fellowship were allowed to walk without one. The turning point comes with Gimli's encounter with Galadriel, and after all of the animosity we had seen between these two races leading up to this point, it packs a hell of a punch.
A friendship/romance between Kili and Tauriel is highly inappropriate given the circumstances of the story, and it undercuts the drama of the Legolas/Gimli friendship and the latter's feelings toward Galadriel (there is a reason why Gimli was given the specific designation "Elf Friend"). This idea is Hollywood pandering at best, and a blatant misunderstanding at worst.
These two races did not like each other. Now, they could be amicable with one another if need be (Elrond was pleasant enough with the dwarves, and they to him), and Dain did honor Thorin's word in giving a portion of the treasure to Thranduil, but that doesn't change the fact that the dwarves and elves weren't so quick to join hands and be friends with one another.
During The Hobbit, the dwarves were, in their eyes, wrongfully imprisoned by the wood elves, and their tempers were all the more fueled when Bard brought the elves with him to the Gates of Erebor with the intention of procuring a portion of the treasure for them as payment for their aid to the people of Lake-town. So in addition to being wrongfully imprisoned (again, in their eyes), they now had to hand over treasure to those who wrongfully imprisoned them? To say that the situation was hostile is an understatement. Don't forget that the men/elves and the dwarves were about to start killing each other before Gandalf pointed out the arrival of the goblins and Wargs. Kili, being Thorin's fiercely loyal nephew, would have certainly stood in his uncle's defense - both against the imprisoning and the giving of treasure to the men/elves. If it came down to a battle between the men/elves and the dwarves, Kili would have killed them without hesitation. No question.
The animosity carries over to The Lord of the Rings. At the Council of Elrond, Gloin was quick to bring up the "wrongs" that the elves committed towards him and his twelve companions sixty years prior (despite it having nothing to do with the discussion at hand). And in Lothlorien, Haldir insisted that Gimli be blind-folded, while the other members of the fellowship were allowed to walk without one. The turning point comes with Gimli's encounter with Galadriel, and after all of the animosity we had seen between these two races leading up to this point, it packs a hell of a punch.
A friendship/romance between Kili and Tauriel is highly inappropriate given the circumstances of the story, and it undercuts the drama of the Legolas/Gimli friendship and the latter's feelings toward Galadriel (there is a reason why Gimli was given the specific designation "Elf Friend"). This idea is Hollywood pandering at best, and a blatant misunderstanding at worst.
Last edited: