Peter has already stated that hes not interested in doing a CBM, so we can cross that off the list.
Exactly, and this is why I want to be careful not to cross Peyton Reed off the list too quickly.
It's easy to say: "I don't want Peyton Reed. I want Peter Jackson or David Fincher or Guillermo del Toro."
But those directors won't want to work with Marvel and Marvel won't want to work with them.
So the real question becomes: "Do you want Peyton Reed, or do you want a director you've never heard of who so far has directed an indie coming-of-age film and a B horror movie?"
From that perspective, Reed brings a lot to the table.
1. He has shown he can direct a medium-large budget film with fantastical elements.
2. He has shown he can translate some of the most potentially laughable comic-book elements to the big screen without them being cheesy.
3. He has worked within the Marvel framework.
4. He knows people at Marvel. He knows management and he knows the special effects people, design artists etc. If he needs to get something done, he knows who to talk to and he knows who he wants on his team.
5. He has shown a real knowledge of and enthusiasm for the FF.
With those pros go one big con: The general light comedic tone of Ant-Man is not what I want from FF.
But Reed has said he wants a tone closer to Avengers. I don't think he'll cast someone like Paul Rudd for Reed, so I'm willing to make that leap of faith and hand him the keys - with the idea that Feige and others at Marvel will be helping him and backing him up and making sure he doesn't go off course.