The Dark Knight On Attack of the Show...

You cannot possibly fathom how little this matters.
 
I think WompuM is wrong. There is still the man show which has lots of hot chicks every episode and they jump on trampolines too. So it isn't the lowest form of entertainment.
 
:oldrazz:

Mess with an established icon, pay the price.

As for Ledger, man, they got the wrong guy for this, cuss me out all you want.

And yes, the show is crap, but I give the panel here credit - this is a fairly accurate representation of how the general public will perceive this....most folks aren't nearly as well versed in comic book lore as we are here but something as iconic as the Joker's look goes without saying.

And as for Ledger's reputation - sure, lots of folks have done gay roles - but none quite as notorious (or graphic) as Ledger's, which, along with attention he has received from getting an Oscar nod for said role, pretty much has branded him in the public eye.

In other words, he's typecast.
 
"The thing that concerns me most is that in his first interview, Ledger was asked if he was a fan of comics and he said he wasn't and never picked one up in his life. When asked what he knew about the movie, he said "I think it's partially based off "The Killing Joke," which I THINK is about how the Joker begins." You THINK? I don't buy it."

So, actors should only be hired for comic book roles if they're long-time comic book fans? Same with Star Trek actors -- you have to be a long-time "Trekkie" or else you'll simply suck?

This is a perennial -- and dumb -- fanboy gripe, and you should ignore it. I don't buy it, and I especially don't buy it when it's said by some know-nothing dorks on a TV talk show.

A good actor or actress can convince us that they are ANYTHING -- that they're a vigilante who dresses up like a bat, the captain of a starship, a rock musician, Abraham Lincoln, a crazed killer who looks like a clown, Queen Elizabeth, a Klingon, a robot, or whatever. They're not required to be experts on every single tiny little geek detail of their role just to pacify slobbering fanboys who live in their parents' basements.

This attitude that "only a fellow fanboy/geek can accurately portray a fanboy/geek obsession" is patently stupid. How many "fanboys" do you know who are successful actors/writers/producers/directors? Not many, because the "fanboy" attitude gets in the way of being a PROFESSIONAL who DELIVERS when millions of dollars are at stake. So consequently, most fanboys are relegated to jobs where their biggest responsibility is saying, "hey, we're out of copy paper again!" or "do you want fries with that?"

And finally, I am so tired of this "Brokebat Mountain" crap that I could puke. Good grief -- has it occurred to any of you that AFTER "The Dark Knight" is released, Ledger is going to be known as the new Joker, rather than a gay cowboy?

I think the guys who are obsessing over Ledger because of his last big film role need to seriously grow up. If he'd last played a scary serial killer in an Oscar-nominated film, we wouldn't be having this stupid debate at all (except then you'd have fanboys whining that Ledger as the Joker showed "no imagination!")

Good grief.

-- Admiral Nelson
 
This attitude that "only a fellow fanboy/geek can accurately portray a fanboy/geek obsession" is patently stupid. How many "fanboys" do you know who are successful actors/writers/producers/directors? Not many, because the "fanboy" attitude gets in the way of being a PROFESSIONAL who DELIVERS when millions of dollars are at stake. So consequently, most fanboys are relegated to jobs where their biggest responsibility is saying, "hey, we're out of copy paper again!" or "do you want fries with that?"

LOL

Obviously, you don't know a thing!
 
Eh, Nicholson's Joker was too campy for my tastes. He seemed like the kind of joe you'd wanna play ping-pong with.
 
Blame God, the ****er shoulda made a 30 year old Nicholson every 10 years. :rolleyes:
 
So anyone who voices their opinion about how the Joker looks gets immediately bashed or praised depending on the comment??? So if I say the Joker looks scornful to look at and doesn't look like the Joker that I want to see in TDK since I prefer something closer to the comic book appearance, would I get bashed like the dudes on the AOTS???
 
So anyone who voices their opinion about how the Joker looks gets immediately bashed or praised depending on the comment??? So if I say the Joker looks scornful to look at and doesn't look like the Joker that I want to see in TDK since I prefer something closer to the comic book appearance, would I get bashed like the dudes on the AOTS???

Anyone can express any opinion, pro or con, about how the Joker is going to be portrayed in TDK, or if they think Ledger is going to do a good job, based on ALL of his previous roles.

However, what I think is silly is pre-judging him as the Joker because a.) he's not a huge comic book fan, or b.) because his last role he played -- gasp! -- a gay cowboy. Both are irrelevant to whether he can play this role or not, IMO.

-- Admiral Nelson
 
It's like saying Reeves couldn't play Neo because he was in Bill & Ted. Or Bruce Willis couldn't play John McClane because he was in Moonlighting. It doesn't make sense.

And the comic nerd was a *****e bag who thinks he's a pirate. He was on a few weeks ago obsessing over PS3 and saying he was still playing Resistance..

AOTS really needs to stop the Feedback Loop.
 
That panel was ******ed. I mean, they're usually bad on there, but that was horrible.

"Durr...Brokebat Mountain! Heeyuck!"

Genius! :wow:

As for Ledger not being a fan, did we all forget that neither was Bale? He didn't care for Batman either until someone gave him TLH.

Relax.
 
Yup.

I mean, atleast they're being honest....instead of having them say they've been fans since they were 5 yrs old. Which, is probably a lie most of the time anyways.

And, I heard Ledger has BECOME a fan since he finished THE KILLING JOKE and ARKHAM ASYLUM.

My point is, that to throw a film under the bus before it's even done filming is.....well.....ignorant.
 
So anyone who voices their opinion about how the Joker looks gets immediately bashed or praised depending on the comment??? So if I say the Joker looks scornful to look at and doesn't look like the Joker that I want to see in TDK since I prefer something closer to the comic book appearance, would I get bashed like the dudes on the AOTS???

no, but if you make a joke about brokeback mountain just because ledger was in it, or you make fun of his past roles as if they had anything to do with this one, you deserve to get flamed.
 
So anyone who voices their opinion about how the Joker looks gets immediately bashed or praised depending on the comment??? So if I say the Joker looks scornful to look at and doesn't look like the Joker that I want to see in TDK since I prefer something closer to the comic book appearance, would I get bashed like the dudes on the AOTS???
I take it you didn't listen to anybody who responded to your earlier post.

There is a difference between giving a well-informed opinion, and an ignorant one. The ones presented by these people are the latter.

The only reason that Heath Ledger gets as much **** as he does is because Brokeback Mountain received much more attention than most movies revolving around gay characters. It was a major motion picture that got alot of Oscar buzz. Christian Bale played a gay character. Nobody made a huge deal about him playing Batman. Liam Neeson played a gay character. Nobody made a fuss about him. Gary Oldman, Michael Caine, they also played gay characters. YET NOBODY HAD A PROBLEM WITH THEM. So why are people crying "Brokeback Batman" over Heath Ledger? He's not the only damn actor to ever play a gay character. It says absolutely NOTHING about his ability to play this character. He's an ACTOR. If Brokeback Mountain was an indie-film, I GUARANTEE you nobody would've given a ****. But no. Because it was a big film, suddenly he's gay. Gotta love the intelligence of movie-going society.

I also love how Heath Ledger is suddenly the only actor to ever be in mediocre/bad movies. Christian Bale had "Reign of Fire." Michael Caine had "Austin Powers 3." Gary Oldman had "Lost in Space," and Liam Neeson had "Star Wars Episode I." These are just to name a few examples. Every actor has there "A Knight's Tale" role.

If you don't like Heath Ledger because his performances just never clicked with you, fine. That's a perfectly suitable opinion. Nobody can force you to enjoy somebody that you just don't. But to dismiss Ledger as The Joker because he played a gay cowboy (damn good too, I might add), or because his earlier roles had been in mediocre films, that is simply pure ignorance, considering that MANY of the Batman Begins actors have been in the same boat.

And like somebody said earlier, I honestly doubt Nicholson has ever lifted a comic book in his life. Go figure the hypocrisy.
 
nobody should give a **** bout this. just hope it aint a sign of things to come and move on.
 
this reminds me of when Daniel Craig was cast as Bond. And Casino Royale didn't have a great buzz EARLY on, until the release. Then most of the haters were silenced.

And now at him now...

...same thing with Ledger (I hope). It's certainly going to be an uphill battle but yelling out "Brokebat Moutain" is lame.
 
There is nothing more infuriatingly, pathetically idiotic than the fanboy obsession that actors must be comic book afficionados to properly portray a character.

It's no different than any other role. They're going off a script. They're going off direction. And they're going off instinct. It's always good to look to the source for inspiration, just as it's good to look to the real person when doing a biopic, but under competent direction (by a director interested in remaining faithful to the source) it is not necessary for an actor to be particularly well-versed in comics. If the character's there, they will find it.

In fact, it might be for the best if actors stayed away from the comics, or at least didn't let themselves be wholly influenced by them. It's restricting.
 
"Ehhh...Brokeback Batman? I dunno. I like the picture, but to me Jack Nicholson is the only Joker."

That should tell you right then we're dealing with jerk-offs.


"A Knight's Tale"...do I have to say anything else?"

Irrelevant.

"The thing that concerns me most is that in his first interview, Ledger was asked if he was a fan of comics and he said he wasn't and never picked one up in his life. When asked what he knew about the movie, he said "I think it's partially based off "The Killing Joke," which I THINK is about how the Joker begins." You THINK? I don't buy it."

Also irrelevant. I bet you Jack Nicholson doesn't know Jack $hit about comic books, either.
 
So anyone who voices their opinion about how the Joker looks gets immediately bashed or praised depending on the comment??? So if I say the Joker looks scornful to look at and doesn't look like the Joker that I want to see in TDK since I prefer something closer to the comic book appearance, would I get bashed like the dudes on the AOTS???

Are you well? You've expressed your persecution complex about three or four times in this thread already. People are judging the faulty reasoning behind the opinions.


Michael Caine had "Austin Powers 3."

More aptly, Jaws: The Revenge. ;)
 
"The thing that concerns me most is that in his first interview, Ledger was asked if he was a fan of comics and he said he wasn't and never picked one up in his life. When asked what he knew about the movie, he said "I think it's partially based off "The Killing Joke," which I THINK is about how the Joker begins." You THINK? I don't buy it."

Man... this really annoys me how come they never Pick actors who are familiarized with the Character, the source o even give a damn about his history

Or is just like they we embaresed to say that at any point of they live they actually read comics
 
most of those are just stupid comments. christian bale was in velvet goldmine and metroland, but nobody made jokes about those when he was cast as bruce wayne, this whole Brokebat Mountain stuff is just stupid.

Maybe is because Bruce Wayne doesn´t have a really familiar or particular look, since he is second to Batman, and under the cowl, and as long as the Batsuit looks good, any good actor would do for the job, and Bale actually showed some good moves and fighting skills in Equilibrium
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"