Superman \S/
Sidekick
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2005
- Messages
- 3,319
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I'll be there first showing. 

Just like you don`t need to watch X-men 1 to understand X-men 2 or Terminator 1 to understand Terminator 2 but if you did, you`d know more things about the history of the characters.skruloos said:And he also said that one not need to have ever seen both those films to catch up and understand this one. So...we don't really know how much SR relies on plot points from the first two movies.
Incorrect. It is stated in X2 that Jean started exhibiting her strange behavior after the events in X1, thus they rely on knowledge of a plotpoint from X1. Also, T2 makes specific mention of the T-100 in T1 and other references to John's father, Kyle Reese which is specific to Reese and Connor's coupling in T1. These movies are true sequels. The Star Wars movies are true sequels. Batman Returns is not a true sequel to Batman '89.SpiderDaniel said:Just like you don`t need to watch X-men 1 to understand X-men 2 or Terminator 1 to understand Terminator 2 but if you did, you`d know more things about the history of the characters.
I SEE SPIDEY said:On DVD, unless I win free tickets or somebody wants to take me.
SpiderDaniel said:True. Its been some time that i don`t watch both movies but its just that i know a lot of people who watched those sequels first. And seriously who never watched Superman the movie??
The way i see it it is that it is a direct sequel to these movies. Superman came from the icy krypton, marlon brando was his father, raised in Smallville, Pa Kent died, Ma Stayed with Ben Hubbard, he met, saved and fell in love with Lois and confronted Lex Luthor. In Superman II Lois and Superman had a romantic relationship and Zod Came. Thats all.
In Superman Returns this movie will feel like an origin because it will show Superman first appearence, Clark returning to the Daily Planet, Luthor was in prison and got out, so everything will be explained. The only problem rests with the kid. If the kid is Supermans, wich i believe he is, then its related to the events of Superman II.
lol no.ROBOCOP CPU001 said:like a date.
![]()
ROBOCOP CPU001 said:shucks..
i was going to get frisky.
![]()
Fair enough, I guess I was giving people too much credit considering the movie was called Batman Begins...Mentok said:Go find a bunch of reviews for BB (not from superhero based sites) Almost all say BB is a prequel. That played a big part in it. Plus the ending confused alot of people (they thought the refrence to The Joker leads into BATMAN 89).
I'm not talking "core audience" necessarily, i'm talking audience in general. Superman has an almost universal audience, I can't imagine someone not wanting to see Superman, comic fan or not, you can't honestly say the same applies to Batman or X-men (better example). Superman is the hero that transends the "comic book movie" label.Mentok said:Its a comicbook film, the core audience is the same. Dont even try and say it draws a different crowd because its 'darker'.
I'm sure this has been beat to death somewhere else so there is no point to debate it, but I will say I can't imagine a live action movie based in reality where batman would be able to survive without some sort of "armor".Mentok said:B.S... The batsuit can be done dozens of different ways in live action. They decided to stick with a crap black foam rubber suit.
Alonsovich said:Then we should have a consensus about what that means... because I use it as a "whatever" attitude...![]()
Metropolis_Man said:Robo.....what have we told you?![]()
this was a joke blogmillennium movies said:I was watching some of the first blogs and saw for the first time the one entitled "the call". I was quite surprised to find out Singer helped on the King Kong movie. Boy did it seem like an awkward situation...
i dont know what in the blog was true and was not.Showtime029 said:I thought he really did help with the movie, although the Blog was staged?