bluejake01
Superhero
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2001
- Messages
- 8,127
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Funny how they have to throw in "Armageddon" in parenthesis
It's not terribly funny since they did the same with Spielberg and War of the Worlds.
Funny how they have to throw in "Armageddon" in parenthesis
they're referencing movies that have similar themes to try to show that these guys know how to make sci fi flicks...
no character in particular. It is the Autobot symbol.Whos eye is that meant to be in the poster? Last time I checked there was debate about it.
Perhaps they felt the basic GMC SUV was a more rugged choice for a character like Ironhide
Right, because the Army would rather use a GMC over a Hummer because of its "ruggedness." Don't confuse an H2 or an H3 with a real Hummer. A real Hummer could drive through a GMC.
and that pic was a H2But the GMC truck isn't an army vehicle in the movieand that pic was a H2
It was a rhetorical statement, what have I told you about thinking.
No it was a pointless and inaccurate statement in a losing argument and don't try to be an ass with me
Haven't seen Snatch, huh? Oh well, it was worth a shot.
t:I simply responded to your statement that a movie team would think a fiberglass POS GMC would make more sense to use for Ironhide than a domestically unstoppable steel beast like the original Hummer, a statement I disagreed with BECAUSE the Army itself uses Hummers as their all-terrain vehicles because they can take the most beating and still run. So, why would a movie team pick a GMC over a Hummer, when they had full support from GM AND the Army for this production. The only thing I can think of is that a GMC would be less conspicuous on the road than a Hummer. But I think people are probably more used to seeing Hummers on the road now anyway, so it's not a really strong argument. The fact is that they just didn't think it through.
Haven't seen Snatch, huh? Oh well, it was worth a shot.
I simply responded to your statement that a movie team would think a fiberglass POS GMC would make more sense to use for Ironhide than a domestically unstoppable steel beast like the original Hummer, a statement I disagreed with BECAUSE the Army itself uses Hummers as their all-terrain vehicles because they can take the most beating and still run. So, why would a movie team pick a GMC over a Hummer, when they had full support from GM AND the Army for this production. The only thing I can think of is that a GMC would be less conspicuous on the road than a Hummer. But I think people are probably more used to seeing Hummers on the road now anyway, so it's not a really strong argument. The fact is that they just didn't think it through.
STOP AND USE YOUR HEAD
IRON HIDE IS NOT "TAKING CONTROL" OF THE TRUCK
HE IS MORPHING INTO THE LOOK AND SHAPE OF IT
KEEPING HIS ARMOR
SO THE BEST IS NOT ALWAYS THE BEST.

Really? Wow, Mr. Caps Lock, I didn't know that's what Transformers did.![]()
But you're right, it's not More Than Meets The HAND, it's More Than Meets The EYE, and VISUALLY a Hummer is more of a match for Ironhide than a normal truck anyday. I was speaking about appearances, not actual compositions, but I see you missed that.
Boiiinng - the US Army does not use 'hummers', they use the HMMWV aka the Humvee. "Hummer" only applies to the civilian vehicles sold under the GM brandname.
In any case the Humvee should be reserved for an updated Hound. Perhaps in the sequel if the movie does well enough to get one.
Going along with what Hunter Rider said, I think the choice of the GMC Topkick is, overall, a pretty good match for Ironhide.
Florida oranges, California oranges, is still an orange.
