Prince of Persia:The Sands of Time

I can't imagine why anyone would ever care what critics say, unless you want to avoid thinking for yourself.

I was just looking forward to this before, but all the tv spots have got me pretty hyped now :up:
 
Yeah, I wasn't really hyped about this movie at all until I saw all the TV spots, looks like it's going to have great action scenes. I'll be ignoring the critics response, seeing as a lot of them hated IM2 and I thought it was great.

One particular scene where it shows Prince Dastan standing and the camera spins around him, I don't know why, but it reminds me of Assassins Creed. :D
 
I'm getting more excited about this every day. I hope it's fun. I'm just looking for a care free fun adventure film.
 
Meh, I'm a fan of the games, but this looks like your forgettable, lame blockbuster. The mixed critical reception so far isn't surprising at all.
 
On the contrary reviews haven't been that bad. A poster from BOM tallied them up so far.

- As always, some reviews do contain spoilers, so be warned
- New reviews added are indicated by (NEW)
- If you find a review that is not in here, let me know

43 reviews so far, %81 Fresh, average of 6.4/10

Positive reviews so far (35):


Examiner.com gives it 5/5

Movie Film Review gives it 8/10 (NEW)

Moviebrit.com gives it 8/10

Voize gives it 4/5 (NEW)

Film Shaft gives it 4/5

Cinema Online gives it 4/5

The Movie Blog gives it 4/5

Cut Print Review gives it 4/5 (NEW)

In The News gives it 7.5/10 (NEW)

Hub Pages gives it 3/4

Hollywood Reporter gives it a positive review (7/10 according to Metacritic)

Screen Geek gives it 3.5/5 (NEW)

Box Office Magazine gives it 3.5/5

Eye for Film gives it 3.5/5

The Dooley Review gives it 62/100

Comingsoon.net gives it 6/10

Time Out London gives it 3/5 (NEW)

OK! gives it 3/5 (NEW)

Movie Fix gives it 3/5 (NEW)

Robin Olly gives it 3/5

Scotsman.com gives it 3/5

Total Film gives it 3/5

Murmur gives it 3/5

Empire Magazine gives it 3/5

The Mirror gives it 3/5

Movie Muser gives it 3/5

Creature Features gives it a positive review (NEW)

Slashing The Seats gives it a positive review (NEW)

Watch? Don't watch? gives it a positive review

Mild Concern gives it a positive review

Clothes on Film gives it a Positive Review

Cine Fundas gives it a positive review

Screen daily gives it a positive review

Hey U Guys gives it a positive review

Blogomatic gives it a positive review

Negative reviews so far ( 8 ):

Variety Gives it a negative review (6/10 according to Metacritic - *Rotten on RT)

Emanuel Levy gives it a C-

MSN UK gives it 2/5 (NEW)

News of the World gives it 2/5

Digital Spy gives it 2/5

Cluch gives it 2/10

The Art Desk gives it a negative review (NEW)

Cinematical gives it a negative review
 
I've seen some tv spots for this and it looks fun. I might end up checking it out :yay:
 
JUst returned from it.
I had very low expectations for this movie because honestly the trailers didn't wow me. I think that helped because i found the movie okay. Nothing memorable . Just an okay movie if you wanna kill some time ( at least in my case).

For a movie that was delayed in order to have time working on the VFX ( amongst other things) i found several of the background shots to look unfinished. And honestly there'isn't any shot in this movie where i went "Wow , that looks great". It was just ..okay.
While it's no surprise that Bruckheimer and co. hoped that PoP turns into another POTC franchise ( even applying the same elements that helped POTC become a success) , i think that POTC works primarily because of Depp and in the case of the sequels some truly astonishing VFX work such as Davey Jones and his crew.
However PoP doesn't have Depp as a charismatic lead. So it's up to Gyllerhall and Aterton . For the most part they have good chesmistry. Their back-and-forth banter did get annoying later on. Perhaps it's because i get sick after a while off constant blabbing around.
To use Robin Hood as an example. By casting Crowe and Blanchett as lovers the filmmakers wisely opted for a mature take on their storylines. Here we have two people who have just grown weary from all the problems in the world and when they finally warm up to each other , it's done very nicely.
In PoP i just got tired of their dialogue.

Still the performances are solid. Gyllenhall works as Dastan . Aterton also is okay as Tamina although her role is just written like that. Supporting cast ranging from KInglsey to Molina , who's comic relief worked quite well , all were good.

It's just that for me the movie wasn't as fun as the first POTC movie or visually entertaining as the 2nd and 3rd POTC movie.
Personally i don't see this movie making more then 200 million domestic but hey we've seen worst movie become hits ( twilight :oldrazz:)

If a sequel will be made i'm hoping that they do go with the dark prince route as well as maturing the storyline because frankly this movie just plays it too safe for my taste

6/10


Also Bruckheimer must really love the series Coupling .
He cast 2 actors from that series in POTC and PoP
 
thanks for the review man :up:

how were the action scenes?
 
Okay..Like i said. Nothing really memorable. Personally i felt that they could've really pushed Gyllenhall to do the parkour scenes but the way the scenes are shot , i think they used stunt doubles for those scenes with Gyllenhall doing the safer wire assisted work.

The sword fighting were filmed mostly in close up with quick editing though not as nauseating as the bourne movies .
 
I saw this and have to agree with the above. It had good action and was entertainning but not rememberable. It defintely had its moments.

On a side note, I would say that I found it quite funny that in the beginning they used an accurate map of the Persian Empire at the height of its glory even though not one of the characters comes from history and no one certainly spoke with an English accent. I did like that they actually used Iraninan dnacing in one of the scenes. This of course has nothing to do with the quality of the movie as anyobdy who wuold go see this movie for historical accuracy should go back to watching cartoons.
 
im so excited about this movie! i need a really good action movie! and looking at Jake shouldnt be too bad either. =D
 
Okay..Like i said. Nothing really memorable. Personally i felt that they could've really pushed Gyllenhall to do the parkour scenes but the way the scenes are shot , i think they used stunt doubles for those scenes with Gyllenhall doing the safer wire assisted work.

The sword fighting were filmed mostly in close up with quick editing though not as nauseating as the bourne movies .
i am thinking in opening a thread now.

this is IMO getting out of hand.through fighting and sword fighting they almost always use close ups and mtv editing.

and i am noticing that directors who are making short movies are always using shaky cam. even for dialoge scene with close up shots on the face.

why do they think that this is good?
 
im so excited about this movie! i need a really good action movie! and looking at Jake shouldnt be too bad either. =D

Another review I read mentioned that the chemistry between Gemma and Jake is unstoppable! That really wet my appetite for the romance aspect of this film. I also keep reading that the action was awesome and overall it did justice to game lovers. I definitely plan on seeing it next week.
 
I'm seeing it Tuesday at El Capitan, and it better have the live show beforehand.

Who from Coupling is in the movie?
 
I watched it last night! The movie was amazing! I thought it was equal to the first Pirates, which for me is the perfect summer movie consisting of action, beautiful characters, some comedy and great locations.

If you love the setting and characters (how can you not?), then you'll be taken away by this fairytale. I've only played the games a little but my friends who have played them all said that the movie is different from the SoT game, because there the hero (who is also nameless, WTF?) kills zombies to retrieve the Sands of Time. Here thankfully none of this happens.

Just sit back and enjoy this movie. It was the best one i've seen this year and i hope they make sequels that will be just as good (not like Pirates 2 & 3 which kinda sucked).
I usually care what critics say but this is not the kind of movie that should be analyzed to death.
EXACTLY!!! Its a fairy tale about a magic dagger. Dont use your mind too much. I didnt and i had a great time. Who cares about minor flaws anyway? Leave that for the critics.
 
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/ent...earrsquos-summer-blockbustersrsquo-slate.html

Shameful

Egged on by their slimy uncle Nizam (Ben Kingsley), they lead a raid on the city of Alamut to find hidden weapons of mass destruction - yes, I'm afraid the writers DID go there - and get involved in a plot to steal a magic dagger that can rewind time.
Jake realises it could be used for evil - probably by his uncle, who's a cackling, bald maniac. So he and Princess Tamina (Gemma Arterton) smuggle it out of the city.
This opening sets the scene nicely for what is to follow - ie just shy of two hours of corny old nonsense - with its fake-looking sets, slack action and head-hangingly shameful dialogue.
Wait until you hear how they get Prince Dustbin to subtly explain how the dagger works in a totally natural and non-staged conversation with Tamina. "Releasing the sand turns back time! So I can change the past to my own advantage! And only the holder of the dagger is aware of what's happened!"
Nice work, Dustbin.
Dustbin's free-running acrobatic antics have been given the hard sell in the trailers - yet they're a fat disappointment.
There's only one sequence where he shows off his skills, and it's so clumsily shot and edited that you never believe for a second it's Jake on screen.
Most of the time, the camera's on his feet or the back of his head. But there's one point, after Dustbin slides down a roof, that you get to see his face. Only problem is, it's the face of a hairy stuntman.
Where the hell did the special effects money go? It's possible they blew it all on Fake Bake - cos snakes alive, I've not seen mugs this orange outside of the TV Quick Awards. And surprisingly, it's Sir Ben who's the main offender. The man looks like a satsuma with a comedy nose stuck on the front.
Alfred Molina, another decent actor, turns up as Sheik Amar, a cheap comedy character.
He would have filled the funny sidekick role, if he'd been given anything funny to say. Instead, he just cracks the same "joke" about dodging taxes all the time.
In fact, the only impressive thing about Prince Of Persia is how director Mike Newell has managed to squander so much talent. Jake could easily be replaced by any hunky F-list dimwit, and the strong supporting cast are smothered by the appalling script.
The only person who can come out of this with their head held high is Gemma Arterton.
Since arriving on the scene with St Trinian's in 2007, she's been in a range of films - not all of them great - but she's always acquitted herself nicely. She gives Tamina backbone, personality and a whole host of other good things nowhere to be found in the rest of the movie.
Will P.O.P be Disney's new swashbuckling franchise? Fat chance. On the strength of this, even a sequel looks unlikely.
Still. The whole time-bending dagger concept makes you think. I mean, have you ever wished you could turn time back just a couple of hours?
One thing's for sure. You will after watching this.
:facepalm:

Hating for hate's sake.
 
The promotion has been terrible for this. I'm really worried about how well this film will do. But right now I hope it's at least enjoyable.
 
Yeah, all they really have is the Lego sets and the video game. I figured there would be breakfast cereal toys, fast food, the whole nine.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"