CelticPredator
Superhero
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2008
- Messages
- 9,155
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Someone had to bring TDKR in here. So i'm telling them off. 
This is better.

This is better.

I have played that game before. It is called the Prequel trilogy.
I am not going to get into the importance of these films, other then to point out that Nolan's Bat films are relevant to today's social issues.
TDKR trailer wasn't a whole lot of images out of context. There was an idea of what the film was about.
Ridley Scott has got far more experience and technology has moved on so much since Ridley directed Blade Runner & Alien which were only his 2nd and 3rd movies that Ridley would have even ore to offer the the genre now plus its the most enjoyable his ever felt on a set his said so hopefully if he enjoyed himself the movie might be good.That is hype, not necessarily reality. I can understand the enjoyment of picking apart trailers, but this feels a little like those wanting Harry Potter to win best picture.
I loved the full version of Kingdom of Heaven. He completely messed up by casting Bloom, but the rest was so strong that I preferred it to Gladiator. But Scott hasn't been a creator of masterpieces since.... Blade Runner.
I don't understand the belief that just because it is Scott that this is going to be amazing. He is 30 years removed from being the guy who made Blade Runner. It would be like thinking Avatar was going to be amazing because Cameron made Aliens and T2. It didn't quite turn out that way.
Sizzler, not mind blowing. My mind hasn't been blown by a trailer since, maybe the full Wall-E trailer.
Uh huh. Alien is far more important as a film. I could care less about Occupy Gotham City with Bane.
I'm watching that movie for the conclusion of the story about Bruce Wayne.
Ridley Scott has got far more experience and technology has moved on so much since Ridley directed Blade Runner & Alien which were only his 2nd and 3rd movies that Ridley would have even ore to offer the the genre now plus its the most enjoyable his ever felt on a set his said so hopefully if he enjoyed himself the movie might be good.
Good space based Sci-Fi movies are rare these days.
I liked American Gangster as well. I would not call it a masterpiece but it was a solid entertaining movie for me. The only bad movie Ridley has made over thelast decade for me was A Good Year.
I'm just trying to get the TDKR nonsense out of here.

Not really...I LOVED Batman Begins and The Dark Knight but I have yet to see anything from TDKR that grabs my interest in a visceral way. This trailer has me easily 10 times more excited than TDKR's.That is hype, not necessarily reality. I can understand the enjoyment of picking apart trailers, but this feels a little like those wanting Harry Potter to win best picture.
I consider Gladiator a masterpiece.I loved the full version of Kingdom of Heaven. He completely messed up by casting Bloom, but the rest was so strong that I preferred it to Gladiator. But Scott hasn't been a creator of masterpieces since.... Blade Runner.
While Avatar isn't quite the type of movie that Aliens or T2 were (both were visceral, R-rated experiences) I still thought it was an amazing movie that is better than most of the stuff that Hollywood puts out now-a-days.I don't understand the belief that just because it is Scott that this is going to be amazing. He is 30 years removed from being the guy who made Blade Runner. It would be like thinking Avatar was going to be amazing because Cameron made Aliens and T2. It didn't quite turn out that way.
Every friggin thread I'm tellin yah. Sooner or later....

I'm just trying to get the TDKR nonsense out of here.

Most likely PG-13. Since that was the agreement.
Oh god.......I think someone's been eating too much peanut butter and JELLY!The love for these trailers is starting to get lost on me. I like the trailer quite a bit, but I honestly don't understand how this or even the Hobbit trailer are destroying people's minds. More hype then the quality of the trailers. The only brain sizzler was TDKR trailer imo.
Where is this agreement and was the lousy Rothman involved?
t was revealed in September 2010 that Ridley Scott wanted an 18-certificate movie (Hard R Rating) and a $250M budget but Fox refused. In another report a few weeks later, Damon Lindelof had apparently finished the rewrites on Spaihts script cutting large set pieces out and making the script PG13 friendly. In that report, it was stated that Ridley wanted a $150M budget. In July 2011 at Comic-Con, Ridley Scott revealed that the movie is being shot as PG13. This is not final. 20th Century Fox will look at the movie and then decide what it will be. Most likely, well get an Uncut Blu-Ray release.
Ridley Scott has got far more experience and technology has moved on so much since Ridley directed Blade Runner & Alien which were only his 2nd and 3rd movies that Ridley would have even ore to offer the the genre now plus its the most enjoyable his ever felt on a set his said so hopefully if he enjoyed himself the movie might be good.
Good space based Sci-Fi movies are rare these days.
I liked American Gangster as well. I would not call it a masterpiece but it was a solid entertaining movie for me. The only bad movie Ridley has made over thelast decade for me was A Good Year.

Not really...I LOVED Batman Begins and The Dark Knight but I have yet to see anything from TDKR that grabs my interest in a visceral way. This trailer has me easily 10 times more excited than TDKR's.
I consider Gladiator a masterpiece.
While Avatar isn't quite the type of movie that Aliens or T2 were (both were visceral, R-rated experiences) I still thought it was an amazing movie that is better than most of the stuff that Hollywood puts out now-a-days.
t:Oh god.......I think someone's been eating too much peanut butter and JELLY!