Public Enemies

Rate the movie

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
:dry:

Uh, Dillinger was definitely not a loser in real life; he was about as suave and cool as it gets. This guy sounds like he doesn't know what he's talking about.


I have to agree, given the man's notoriety and fame, why in the hell would someone describe the character as a loser?
 
I have to agree, given the man's notoriety and fame, why in the hell would someone describe the character as a loser?

'Cause he didn't disappear into the ether and live quietly, but rich-ly, on a farm in Iowa? Instead he let a bunch of cops get the drop on him. So, if it was a game, he lost.

Having said that, we're discussing him and there's a movie about him. Neither will probably happen to me when I'm done on this Earth.
 

Ebert's all over the place with his reviews so I can't say I care too much for his opinion, but I know his reviews carry weight with a lot of people on this board so I'm pleased to hear he liked the movie. :up:

'Cause he didn't disappear into the ether and live quietly, but rich-ly, on a farm in Iowa? Instead he let a bunch of cops get the drop on him. So, if it was a game, he lost.

Having said that, we're discussing him and there's a movie about him. Neither will probably happen to me when I'm done on this Earth.

Reviews I've read so far indicate that Dillinger knew or at least suspected that the life he was leading was going to end in tragedy. He was just determined to enjoy what time he had to the fullest.
 
What's the word been on Wenham?

I'm straying away from the reviews, have any mentioned him?
 
I'll admit im a bit of a ****e for Michael Mann because he shoots almost everything on location....and I dig that
 
What's the word been on Wenham?

I'm straying away from the reviews, have any mentioned him?
frrom one I review I read they said the movie was decent and Wenham, Tatum, and Graham barely have any lines and little screen time.
The review also said it was more of a romance story between Depp and Cotillard and the other characters dont really do much

But Ive only heard that from one review
 
rotten tomatoes fails so badly. somehow saying that a moive is a good film but not a great film means its a bad film. they make that mistake in rating many of the reviews the tomatometer for this film should be much higher
 
frrom one I review I read they said the movie was decent and Wenham, Tatum, and Graham barely have any lines and little screen time.
The review also said it was more of a romance story between Depp and Cotillard and the other characters dont really do much

But Ive only heard that from one review
I've been reading a bunch of reviews, and sadly I still haven't seen mention of Wenham. Stephen Graham has a slightly larger role, though, and I've seen him mentioned in a few reviews as one of the standouts.

rotten tomatoes fails so badly. somehow saying that a moive is a good film but not a great film means its a bad film. they make that mistake in rating many of the reviews the tomatometer for this film should be much higher
That's why I prefer Metacritic. They only use the "proven" critics, and score them based on how positive or negative a review was, instead of just "Fresh or Rotten."
 
My friend wants to see this tomorrow. I don't know if I'll go. I want to save my money until HBP or hell, maybe ST again.
 
Lots more reviews are out, and it would seem that most of the major critics have liked it so far. Here are some of the new ones:

Positive-

The New York Times
The Los Angeles Times
Rolling Stone (As we already knew, Travers freakin' loved it)
USA Today
The Village Voice
The Miami Herald
The Baltimore Sun
The Chicago Tribune (Phillips liked it, but with reservations.)
James Berardinelli (3/4 stars)
And of course, it's already been posted, but in case anyone missed it, Roger Ebert.


Mixed/Negative-

The New York Post (Lumenick hates it, but he's never been a Michael Mann fan...)
The Boston Globe (very mixed, says the real weak spot is the script)
The Philadelphia Inquirer
 
Last edited:
Good enough for me . It's a little dissapointing to hear about Bale's role but Depp should be engaging enough to make this worthwhile.
 
Anyone attend midnight screenings?

I'll be seeing it tonight after work. :up:
 
Will be going to see this on my lunch hour at the AMC River East where they had the premiere. Will give some info later.
 
I'm seeing it at seven tonight. Surprised to hear no one went to the midnight show last night. :huh:
 
There were a couple in my area, but seeing Transformers last week really wrecked me having such a late night, couldn't do 2 weeks in a row.
 
same CELTIC

I was knocked out by a midnight showing. I dont plan on going to another one until probaly Iron Man II
 
It doesn't help getting only 3.5 hours of sleep before work either. :/
 
Should be seeing it tonight at 7-8. Can't wait, I'm a big fan of Michael Mann but I've only seen Collateral and Miami Vice at the cinema.
 
So whats been the consensus that people have been hearing
Basically Ive been hearing: "Meh"

Everybody praises the performances (esp. Crudup's) and the set pieces, but alot say the characters were one dimensional and uninteresting and how they dont go deep into any of the characters
 
I've just seen it if there's anything you want to know just ask.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"