Quentin Tarantino's Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

Staaahhp.

And who's retiring? QT? After his tenth film. He's got two to go.
 
Pitt was hilarious in Basterds. Nobody is bad in a Tarantino movie.
 
I didn't enjoy Inglorious Basterds unlike most but Pitt was the Highlight for me.
His Italian was spot on.
 
Pitt was hilarious in Basterds. Nobody is bad in a Tarantino movie.

I disagree with that statement but then again it's my opinion. I absolutely despise Deathproof and it's one of the very few cases in my life i actually was pissed off after watching a movie. I hated hated that movie.
 
https://***********/krolljvar/status/959164722384748549
Justin Kroll
@krolljvar

Some QT-Manson updates: The role Pitt and Cruise have met on is for that of a stuntman not prosecutor, the Leo character is also Tate's neighbor in the pic and Polanski will play key role in film, QT going discovery route wants authentic polish thesp
 
Quentin going as far to cast someone playing Polanski? I love the balls that he has, man. Goddamn.
 
Pitt was hilarious in Basterds. Nobody is bad in a Tarantino movie.

Eli Roth is pretty bad in Inglourious Basterds, as well as him and a select number of cast members in Death Proof.
 
https://***********/krolljvar/status/959164722384748549

Fascinating. But I really hope that he is not going to dramatize the actual murders. Unless he is going for a different kind of film, they are really just too dark and horrifying for even a Tarantino movie to keep its buoyant and cheeky stylized irreverence.
 
I'm glad Cruise would be playing the stuntman. It's hilariously fitting he would and it's even funnier/cooler that stunt doubles didn't look anything like the actors back then (part of the fun of the charm of this movie that minds that idea) so a Leo/Cruise duo is something I am really crossing my fingers for. Can you imagine? Cruise would make a great Manson but those two navigating a bloody Tarantino plot is just too good.
 
This film apparently takes place before the murders. Leo character is Sharon Tates' neighbor.
 
Fascinating. But I really hope that he is not going to dramatize the actual murders. Unless he is going for a different kind of film, they are really just too dark and horrifying for even a Tarantino movie to keep its buoyant and cheeky stylized irreverence.

That of course assumes that cheeky stylized irreverence would be what he'd be going for if he did depict the murders.

Django has plenty of much more serious sequences despite that cartoonishness of the last act.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/03/opinion/sunday/this-is-why-uma-thurman-is-angry.html

I'll just leave this here. Its mostly an article about Harvey Weinstein's long history of behaviors but it does touch on Tarantinos arguable complicity in some of it.

But then it gets into a whole incident on the set of Kill Bill wherein Uma Thurman refused to a car stunt because she had been told the car was not reliable. Tarantino pressured her into doing the stunt and let to an awful crash. Footage from inside the car is included and it is terrible. QT and Weinstein refused to let Thurman see or have the footage unless she signed wavers releasing them from responsibility for her injuries and he only gave up the footage after police pressure last year. I've seriously lost any respect for Quentin Tarantino.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"