raimi to stop after 3?

raimi and maguire dont have the privlege to work on the spider-man title.
 
Yeah, I heard they were rebooting the franchise with some Andrew guy
 
These threads remind me of old times here. It's like stepping back into the past when we were naive and optimistic about SM-3.
 
These threads remind me of old times here. It's like stepping back into the past when we were naive and optimistic about SM-3.

My initial reaction was incredible disappointment. SM3 is one of the only adaptions of Spidey in media I didn't like.
 
My initial reaction was incredible disappointment. SM3 is one of the only adaptions of Spidey in media I didn't like.
Ultimate Spider-Man (the tv show) is leagues worse than Spider-Man 3, in least that movie had Sam Raimi's soul and was generally well directed
Who keeps digging up really old threads
It wasn't me this time, i swear. But the other time it was me :oldrazz:
 
These threads remind me of old times here. It's like stepping back into the past when we were naive and optimistic about SM-3.
I wouldn't call anyone naive, the trailers for SM3 were amazing.
 
Ultimate Spider-Man (the tv show) is leagues worse than Spider-Man 3,

Well, I take it SM3 wins only when against crappy TV cartoons.

in least that movie had Sam Raimi's soul

I'm not sure what this means, but I only saw the very worst of Raimi's Spider-man movies here: the feeling that crappy comedy could fix everything up.

and was generally well directed

Where exactly? This movie had all kinds of bad decisions.

**************************

That's false advertising
And I decided to stop caring about trailers for that reason

The trailers themselves are false advertising. Believing in them in naivety.
 
Uwe Boll probably would have made a more entertaining third movie. :o
No he wouldn't
Well, I take it SM3 wins only when against crappy TV cartoons.



I'm not sure what this means, but I only saw the very worst of Raimi's Spider-man movies here: the feeling that crappy comedy could fix everything up.



Where exactly? This movie had all kinds of bad decisions.

**************************



The trailers themselves are false advertising. Believing in them in naivety.
[YT]rXOa5bWFRKw[/YT]

Scenes like this were also very funny

[YT]rVBNSsdH9ws[/YT]

Like it or not Spider-Man is a giant soup opera, allways has been, comedy and chesyness are part of it.
 
No he wouldn't

[YT]rXOa5bWFRKw[/YT]

Scenes like this were also very funny

[YT]rVBNSsdH9ws[/YT]

Like it or not Spider-Man is a giant soup opera, allways has been, comedy and chesyness are part of it.

Yes, some poor English-killing Inspector Clouseau impression. That's just golden comedy.

But Stan Lee knew better that not everything that works in comics will work on films.
 
Yes, some poor English-killing Inspector Clouseau impression. That's just golden comedy.

But Stan Lee knew better that not everything that works in comics will work on films.
The things is that it worked, what didn't work were things that were not from the comics like the dance scene, emo Pete and Sandman as Ben's killer. Little scenes like that one from the dinner were allways the highlights in Sam Raimi's series.
 
The things is that it worked, what didn't work were things that were not from the comics like the dance scene, emo Pete and Sandman as Ben's killer. Little scenes like that one from the dinner were allways the highlights in Sam Raimi's series.

Do you think the GA had half a problem with the identity of Ben's killer?

But well, Raimi's humor was barely bearable and at times like this one just intolerable. Thing is, we don't have a clue to factually determine what was what worked and what didn't with the GA.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"