Still Wynning
That is the gist of it. (She/Her) 🦉
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2010
- Messages
- 5,484
- Reaction score
- 5,804
- Points
- 103
One of the few times I agree with OutofBoose, but he’s right. The cheap looking cinematography, the bad looking CG infected dog and Tyrant. This looks like straight-to-DVD fodder.
And that music choice. What were they even thinking?
I’ve seen shots from trailers for recent indie films with probably a way lower budget that look more cinematic than whatever fan-film junk this is.
Say what you will about the Anderson flicks and how bad they were, they certainly didn’t skimp out in the cinematography department. There are shots in those at times that make them look like way better than they actually are.
Someone like a James Wan or a Leigh Wannell, who both make really quality looking fare for cheap, would killed it on something like this. I mean, just watch some of the better Saw films, the Conjuring films, or even Upgrade or The Invisible Man.
I mean, there’s just no excuse for this low level of quality.
And that music choice. What were they even thinking?

Just check out filmography of the director. Dirty deeds done dirt cheap. The guy didn't outgrow his indie roots.
I’ve seen shots from trailers for recent indie films with probably a way lower budget that look more cinematic than whatever fan-film junk this is.
Say what you will about the Anderson flicks and how bad they were, they certainly didn’t skimp out in the cinematography department. There are shots in those at times that make them look like way better than they actually are.
Someone like a James Wan or a Leigh Wannell, who both make really quality looking fare for cheap, would killed it on something like this. I mean, just watch some of the better Saw films, the Conjuring films, or even Upgrade or The Invisible Man.
I mean, there’s just no excuse for this low level of quality.