Resistance was crap. The afct that people jack off obver it just goes to show what a **** lineup the PS3 had. The screens for R2 look very nice... They fixed the stupid diffused lighting they used in the first game.
Your mother is a ****e, and it's way better than Killzone.And Similarly, The Darkness is a terrrible game.
"Squads" is never going to work. Even in the strictest military games, people lone-wolf it like crazy.
I love how everyone justifies the ******edly large multiplayer games by saying you'll have "squads". Oh so its not going to be a free-for-all, but one giant team deathmatch.
Have fun dying every 5 seconds because there are so many people in the game.
I love how everyone justifies the ******edly large multiplayer games by saying you'll have "squads". Oh so its not going to be a free-for-all, but one giant team deathmatch.
Have fun dying every 5 seconds because there are so many people in the game.
The Orange Box, sure, but it's very different kind of FPS.
CoD4 sure it's better, but Resistance 1 isn't Resistance 2.
No chance in hell R6V
And Similarly, The Darkness is a terrrible game.
I'd only stick in Unreal Tournamnet because of the mod features.
Resistance holds its own again those FPS games, and tgere's no chance that R6V is a better FPS, nor the Darkness, so you're left with 2. 1 of which (UTIII) is about the most loosely 'balanced' FPS in history with a totall forgettable campaign. Because the Darkness was pretty bloody Terrible.
you could just choose to play a smaller game
If people just played the smaller games wouldn't that just null the fact that they have 60 player deathmatchs?
블라스;13788311 said:But, but, but....MORE OF EVERYTHING IS ALWAYS BETTER, AMIRITE??
블라스;13788311 said:But, but, but....MORE OF EVERYTHING IS ALWAYS BETTER, AMIRITE??
It is in the context of massive battles over huge maps. You never had the problem of running into a person every 5 seconds with 40 players in the 40 player maps in the original and the new maps are apparently even bigger.