Resistance: The Fall of Man (threads Merged)

[Mentok]

http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/743/743289/imgs_1.html

If you want to sure. It looks pretty run of the mill imo, I'm not seeing any disparity between these shots and what I played.

Those are all from the MULTIPLAYER component of CoD2.

 

[Fenrir]

heh, how do you lot like it. you guys can give it but you can't take it. you all jump in because you feel threatened it's hilarious.

No, we jump in because even after your never-ending condescending babble of having "greater logic" and "higher level of knowledge", you don't know any better than to keep your trap shut about a game you haven't played (and worse, arguing about it with those who have).

i suggest the possiblity and you balk. if the vids were inengine copied to a disc you wouldn't have a clue. the benefit would be that you could add a few effects on top of what's normily there and have more stuff on screen. it's a smart way to make games look better.

If you can't even distinguish between an in-engine video and that of the engine itself running in real-time while playing a game on your TV, then we can't help you. It's a relatively easy thing to figure out.

Oh and may I take the liberty to highlight the logical paradox in the fact that having never played the bloody game and while merely suggesting a possibility, yet you dare to call on THWIP to "prove" there aren't any videos in Call of Duty 2? Nice to see that you having the "intellectual insight" to challenge well-known facts with blind and baseless hypothesis.

 

[Mentok]

Or everyone in the CraigisnotBond.com website

GRRRRRR They suck

 

[Mentok]

Oh and may I take the liberty to highlight the logical paradox in the fact that having never played the bloody game and while merely suggesting a possibility, yet you dare to call on THWIP to "prove" there aren't any videos in Call of Duty 2? Nice to see that you having the "intellectual insight" to challenge well-known facts with blind and baseless hypothesis.

Hahaha

 

[Danalys]

it's fighting fire with fire again. this is me making sure you know where the burndon of proof should lie. nothing wrong with making a hypothesis and then testing it. i just don't trust most of your ability to test anything. it's the route of most of the mistaken bravado that comes my way. and i know most of your don't like bravado because i tested that aswell.

well known "facts" have been challenged all through out history. with good reason. because it's commen for people to think things are facts that aren't. my hypothosis was based on one particular programming model. one that actually makes sense in the case of the 360. the lack of any background detail probably makes that shot way easier to render anyway.

there's nothing wrong with saying maybe. when you actually mean maybe. i have no reason to trust the judgement of multiple people in this thread. so i'll not take their word for things.

 

[Mentok]

it's fighting fire with fire again. this is me making sure you know where the burndon of proof should lie. nothing wrong with making a hypothesis and then testing it. i just don't trust most of your ability to test anything. it's the route of most of the mistaken bravado that comes my way. and i know most of your don't like bravado because i tested that aswell.

well known "facts" have been challenged all through out history. with good reason. because it's commen for people to think things are facts that aren't. my hypothosis was based on one particular programming model. one that actually makes sense in the case of the 360. the lack of any background detail probably makes that shot way easier to render anyway.

there's nothing wrong with saying maybe. when you actually mean maybe. i have no reason to trust the judgement of multiple people in this thread. so i'll not take their word for things.

 

[Avalanche]

Gah! Are we still fighting in here? This has been going on for a week now. Move on.

 

[Danalys]

i wouldn't call this fighting. more like rough play.

 

[블라스]

I've already played it.
That would have no baring on anything.
It's your average WWII FPS done well, imo, not a fantastic game.

That's Kool & The Gang.

 

[블라스]

haven't those pics been used to death.

O wait...

 

[THWIP*]

I've already played it.
That would have no baring on anything.
It's your average WWII FPS done well, imo, not a fantastic game.

*BEARING

ANYWAY.......IF YOU "PLAYED" THE GAME.... BUT NEVER "BEAT" THE GAME, OR NEVER PLAYED THROUGH MOST OF IT ON "HARDENED" OR "VETERAN",OR PLAYED MULTIPLE 'LIVE' MATCHES........YOU HAVEN'T "PLAYED IT". PERIOD. THERE'S NOTHING "AVERAGE" ABOUT THE GAME.......PARTICULARLY WHEN COMPARED TO ANY PREVIOUS WW2 GAME ; IT'S HANDS-DOWN THE BEST OF THE GENRE........EVER. BETTER THAN ANY OF THE 'MOH' GAMES (THE ORIGINAL WAS AMAZING FOR IT'S TIME, BUT "CAN'T TOUCH THIS"). BETTER THAN ANY PREVIOUS 'COD' GAME.

 

[THWIP*]

it's fighting fire with fire again. this is me making sure you know where the burndon of proof should lie. nothing wrong with making a hypothesis and then testing it. i just don't trust most of your ability to test anything. it's the route of most of the mistaken bravado that comes my way. and i know most of your don't like bravado because i tested that aswell.

well known "facts" have been challenged all through out history. with good reason. because it's commen for people to think things are facts that aren't. my hypothosis was based on one particular programming model. one that actually makes sense in the case of the 360. the lack of any background detail probably makes that shot way easier to render anyway.

there's nothing wrong with saying maybe. when you actually mean maybe. i have no reason to trust the judgement of multiple people in this thread. so i'll not take their word for things.

NO, 'DANALYS', "FIGHTING FIRE WITH FIRE" INDICATES AN EQUALITY, THAT COULD NEVER EXIST BETWEEN US. YOU IGNORE FACTS, TO HELP AID YOU IN YOUR DELUSION. I AM SIMPLY STATING THE OBVIOUS.....PRESENTING FACTS THAT, QUITE FRANKLY, ARE NOT OPEN FOR DEBATE. IF YOU EVER BOTHERED TO PLAY 'COD2', YOU MAY FINALLY REALIZE WHAT A COMPLETE MORON YOU'RE BEING HERE.

THEN AGAIN.....YOU MAY NOT, SINCE YOU SEEM TO HAVE TROUBLE INTERPRETING WHAT YOUR EYES FUNNEL INTO THE SPACE BETWEEN YOUR EARS.

 

[Mentok]

Calling CoD2 average? Thats lame

 

[Danalys]

none of your "facts" are facts untill you prove them and you never do. i however say things that don't need to be proved, and yet still make a case for them being likely. you pick on my weakest point in your opinion, and still end up giving up. you so dearly want to win this but it's just not going to happen. i must apologise, it must be frustrating for you. sorry. anyway must be off.

 

[블라스]

Wow

 

[Mentok]

none of your "facts" are facts untill you prove them and you never do. i however say things that don't need to be proved, and yet still make a case for them being likely. you pick on my weakest point in your opinion, and still end up giving up. you so dearly want to win this but it's just not going to happen. i must apologise, it must be frustrating for you. sorry. anyway must be off.

 

[Avalanche]

Argh!

d.e.v.e.l.o.p.i.n.g .a. h.e.a.d.a.c.h.e

 

[THWIP*]

Wow

TIMES 2.

IT'S LIKE WE'RE ARGUING OVER 2 COMPLETELY SEPARATE THINGS OR SOMETHING. I MEAN, ONLY SOMEONE WITH THE INTELLECT OF LOBOTOMIZED LEMMING, WOULD THINK THEY COULD "PROVE" THEY KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT A GAME, WHEN THEY'VE OBVIOUSLY NEVER EVEN PLAYED IT. IT'S SUCH A SIMPLE CONCEPT, EVEN MY 8 Y.O. NEPHEW WOULD UNDERSTAND IF I TOLD HIM (WHICH I GUESS REALLY ISN'T FAIR TO 'DANALYS', SINCE MY NEPHEW IS ALREADY DOING 3RD GRADE SCHOOLWORK).

 

[Mentok]

TIMES 2.

IT'S LIKE WE'RE ARGUING OVER 2 COMPLETELY SEPARATE THINGS OR SOMETHING. I MEAN, ONLY SOMEONE WITH THE INTELLECT OF LOBOTOMIZED LEMMING, WOULD THINK THEY COULD "PROVE" THEY KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT A GAME, WHEN THEY'VE OBVIOUSLY NEVER EVEN PLAYED IT. IT'S SUCH A SIMPLE CONCEPT, EVEN MY 8 Y.O. NEPHEW WOULD UNDERSTAND IF I TOLD HIM (WHICH I GUESS REALLY ISN'T FAIR TO 'DANALYS', SINCE MY NEPHEW IS ALREADY DOING 3RD GRADE SCHOOLWORK).

This thread makes me sad

 

[Fenrir]

it's fighting fire with fire again. this is me making sure you know where the burndon of proof should lie.

Please, spare us the smug attitude. The burden of proof rests solely upon your shoulders now - THWIP has posted his "proof" and as being the one who is questioning it, it is now your turn to bring something to the table to make any case of counter-argument here.

nothing wrong with making a hypothesis and then testing it.

But hypothesis based on WHAT? Pure guesswork? You haven't even played the bloody game yet to come to any kind of rational conclusion.

i just don't trust most of your ability to test anything.

If it's YOUR kind of testing that relies on blind and baseless hypothesis, then that can only be a good thing.

it's the route of most of the mistaken bravado that comes my way. and i know most of your don't like bravado because i tested that aswell.

Please, go and enlighten yourself with the basics of the English language first. Seeing you fumbling around cluelessly here with complex words that you barely have an idea of how to utilize properly is counter-productive to this discussion. Plus it speaks volumes about the fragmented state of your education. Which isn't a good thing if you're thinking of intimadating us with pseudo-academic gibberish that barely makes any kind of sense, especially when considering the fact that it is already misplaced due to it's irrelevance to the points raised in this argument.

well known "facts" have been challenged all through out history. with good reason. because it's commen for people to think things are facts that aren't. my hypothosis was based on one particular programming model. one that actually makes sense in the case of the 360. the lack of any background detail probably makes that shot way easier to render anyway.

Like I said, your hypothesis isn't even based on any tangible or accountable information. And yes, well known facts have been challenged throughout history, but the ones that are anything like YOUR hypothesis have been disregarded and made a mockery of.

there's nothing wrong with saying maybe. when you actually mean maybe. i have no reason to trust the judgement of multiple people in this thread. so i'll not take their word for things.

You know, at times I am just totally convinced that this shallow display of arrogance and self-importance is merely to mask your incompetence in directly and properly responding to the arguments raised by your opponents. Selectively picking a pointless tangent and then proceeding to write a meaninglessly pedantic assessment which one feels somehow demonstrates their hightened intellect is the oldest trick in the book used by those who have backed themselves into a corner.

So please...Danalys...let's keep it simple and on topic now, shall we?

 

[Danalys]

nope i don't need to play this your way. be on topic all you want.

 

[THWIP*]

nope i don't need to play this your way. be on topic all you want.

 

[블라스]

Guys, you'll be amazed at how GREAT a big bowl of Frosted Flakes with cold milk makes you feel, after being in this thread

 

[THWIP*]

Guys, you'll be amazed at how GREAT a big bowl of Frosted Flakes with cold milk makes you feel, after being in this thread

I DON'T BELIEVE YOU. I BET YOUR BOWL ISN'T EVEN THAT BIG, AND YOU DON'T FEEL THAT "GREAT". HELL.......WITHOUT VISUAL PROOF, I'M INCLINED TO BELIEVE YOU'VE ONLY HAD A SMALL BOWL OF OATMEAL.

 

[Mentok]

Guys, you'll be amazed at how GREAT a big bowl of Frosted Flakes with cold milk makes you feel, after being in this thread

:meow: