The Dark Knight Rises Return of Ra's Al Ghul?

Return of Ra's Al Ghul?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe

  • I don't know, Who's Ra's Al Ghul? :D


Results are only viewable after voting.
TheVileOne said:
If the filmmakers really wanted to bring Ra's back they could. WITHOUT the Lazarus pit.

How would they?
 
dude ra's is old news. it would be boring to bring him back for the next or any of the sequels for that matter. i'm for concentrating on the new villain in town Joker.
 
The only way I see Rahs coming back is if somehow and some way he survived the train crash (which pretty much is a big fat smelly "NO"). I say bring in Talia and have her avenge her father's death, but can't because she's in love with Batman because he is "the great detective" and he is her "beloved."

The Lazarus Pit would work if for somewhere down the road they wanted to make a "Indiana Jones-esque Batman" or do "The Demon's Head" and follow that storyline, but I just say go with the Talia vs. Batman route. :up:
 
ganstaman56 said:
dude ra's is old news. it would be boring to bring him back for the next or any of the sequels for that matter. i'm for concentrating on the new villain in town Joker.

Really? old news? I didn't say bring him in Batman 2 and why not in 3rd or 4th. He can be great threat to Batman in the sequels.
 
Calendar Man said:
Maybe..but in a later film. Not this next one.

Hence that's why I put this here, this forum covers Batman 3, 4 and 5 etc..
 
I wouldn't mind if Talia stuck around for the entire sequel without Ra's revealing himself....

not to mention her not going by the name of Talia so they can fool the viewers mostly...

her and Bruce have a relationship and all of that and then she reveals herself in the 3rd when Ra's makes himself known....in the 3rd...

all the while Batman deals with the Joker and 2Face.....and then the 4th you have Bane :up: :up: :doom:
 
Ronny Shade said:
Fool, Ra's Al Ghul is never old news :down

gangstaman is a fool...wise choice of words here...

Ra's can be in every Batman for all I care...Neeson is the next Chuck Norris as far as I'm concerned :supes:
 
Neeson was great as Ra's al Ghul. It would be a sin to not have him return.
 
I would definitely want to see him back, great character, good role, why not?
 
Neeson was great as Ra's al Ghul. It would be a sin to have him return.
 
I wouldn't want to see Ra's return. Not that I do not have love for Ra's just I got two reasons:

- I want to see more villains. I would prefer to not repeat villains unless it is someone like Joker; the rumor where he will have small role in BB2 and then big in BB3.

- Nolan is taking a more realistic approach and having some guy who has lived for 800 years and survives off of his beloved lazurus pits is not exactly realistic.
 
trustyside-kick said:
- Nolan is taking a more realistic approach and having some guy who has lived for 800 years and survives off of his beloved lazurus pits is not exactly realistic.
First, realistic doesn't mean it has to be completely real. Second, Ra's death was ambigious. He could be alive or dead. I wouldn't mind a re-appearence but not playing a major role again until a later film.
 
Well the main thing is I do not want to keep seeing the same villain no matter how great he did previous; you played in our latest elimination game, you know I loved his performance as long as Jack's but I still wouldn't want to see them multiple times.

You have no idea how much it bothers me that every-single-Superman-movie-has-had-Lex-in-it. I would love it so much to see Parasite and Metallo make appearances as well.
 
I think to really explains Ra's origin they should do a spin off film, but not tell advertise it as a Batman film, or even really allude to it in the marketing. They should just call it "The Demons Head" and it would be like Gladiator mixed with La Mes and Last Samurai and any other awesome period piece you can think of. Make it narrated by Talia, and bring back all the ninja's for the modern time, and show all the different "Ubu's" (or fake Ra's)

(POST 800)
 
Nah, I wouldn't really like a Ra's film.

Kinda dislike the fact that Marvel is making a spin-off film for Wolverine.
 
Spidey-Bat said:
First, realistic doesn't mean it has to be completely real. Second, Ra's death was ambigious. He could be alive or dead. I wouldn't mind a re-appearence but not playing a major role again until a later film.

Ambiguous? He did fall a tremendous height inside a train that exploded in a big way and you call that ambiguous.
 
El Payaso said:
Ambiguous? He did fall a tremendous height inside a train that exploded in a big way and you call that ambiguous.

No body.

Plus, didn't you see his face at the end? He closed his eyes, went all calm and serene. He was totally about to flip out with some awesome ninja moves.
 
thedarks0ldier said:
I think to really explains Ra's origin they should do a spin off film, but not tell advertise it as a Batman film, or even really allude to it in the marketing. They should just call it "The Demons Head" and it would be like Gladiator mixed with La Mes and Last Samurai and any other awesome period piece you can think of. Make it narrated by Talia, and bring back all the ninja's for the modern time, and show all the different "Ubu's" (or fake Ra's)

(POST 800)

Of all of Batman's Villians Ras is the only one who would be able to support a movie. Actually if done right it could make for a damn good movie.
 
Well if Batman and Superman ever happens, I say bring him back then. Since Nolan's Batman will now be less realistic having an alien accompanying him, it'll be easier to except Ra's coming back through a lazurus pit. Just an idea.
 
Katsuro said:
No body.

Plus, didn't you see his face at the end? He closed his eyes, went all calm and serene. He was totally about to flip out with some awesome ninja moves.

Of course there is no body. He was crushed, cut and then desintegrated in a fireball.



castro.jpg
liam-neeson.jpg


Ra's previous attempt to destroy the world?
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"