Asteroid-Man
Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2005
- Messages
- 18,007
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 33
You tell him Trump! Maybe he'll give us his birth certific- oh wait, never mind.
It's called self-defense. Things become more understandable when you appear to be literally fighting for your life. You can disagree all you want, but let's have a 6 foot 300 pound guy attack you and see where you stand on things in the heat of the moment.
And, as I brought up in my other good points that I think should be addressed by anyone who is outraged by this decision, all the evidence was presented to a jury of their peers and they decided they cannot indict him for any wrong-doing.
People who were presented with everything there is to know about the case came to the conclusion that he did nothing wrong; I think that says a lot right there.
It's called self-defense. Things become more understandable when you appear to be literally fighting for your life. You can disagree all you want, but let's have a 6 foot 300 pound guy attack you and see where you stand on things in the heat of the moment.
And, as I brought up in my other good points that I think should be addressed by anyone who is outraged by this decision, all the evidence was presented to a jury of their peers and they decided they cannot indict him for any wrong-doing.
People who were presented with everything there is to know about the case came to the conclusion that he did nothing wrong; I think that says a lot right there.
People keep bringing up the fact that Brown was unarmed which doesn't really matter since his own body was a weapon. Has nobody ever heard of one-punch homicide before? How about Brett Meredith, an off duty cop who was killed with one punch.
http://www.theglobalmail.org/feature/one-punch-can-change-your-life-and-hundreds-of-others/309/
Just random guys. Those masks seem to be the top choice for protestors and vandals in situations like this.
He tried taking his gun and charged at him after being told numerous times to stop.
It WAS a matter of debate, they had a trial that reviewed all of the evidence and witnesses. People don't like the outcome because of what the media twisted the story around to be when this incident first happened.
I find these protests rather dubious given the character of Michael Brown.
Reminds me of something I read on Twitter: "The new racism is denial of racism".
Actually that's the problem. This wasn't even a trial. The decision was that this doesn't even warrant going to trial.
Even in a lot of self defense cases, that still has to be publicly proven.
This was done behind closed doors.
All of this could have been prevented if all law enforcement were forced to wear cameras while on duty. It's such an easy, logical solution.
"So, although you told the investigators this is what you saw even though you only heard it from someone, you don't feel you lied?"
"Nope."
"And what did you actually see."
"I saw Michael Brown on his knees begging for his life as the office stood over him from behind and put a bullet in his head from point blank range."
"And, given that the forensic evidence tells us otherwise, there's nothing about that testimony you would like to change?"
"Nope. Maybe the forensic evidence just saw it from a different perspective than I did."
Have you seen the guy? He was huge. It's very much within reason that it would take multiple gun shots to effectively bring him down. Not to mention having a suspect lunge at you and aim to steal your gun is a scary thing. A scene like that is chaotic, Wilson wouldn't of had the luxury and time to precisely hit his knee cap or something farfetched like that. He's going to aim to bring down the attacker. That's it.As a black male I think the jury got it right and wrong. I don't think the cop should have been charged with murder but I do think he should have been charged. I can understand shooting someone once or twice or even three times to stop him. But this cop shot him 12 times. You mean to tell me if you were trying to stop him you couldn't have shot him in the leg or knee cap to stop him from coming. 12 shots IMO is a bit to much and that's the only thing I take issue too.
On a side note once again it is a shame to see my race acting the way we are and yet it is a minority that acts this way but in the long run it makes us all look bad because that small minority is how America see the majority even when we don't act like that.
Potatos are going to potato.One of the gems from the 70 hours of testimony from the Grand Jury.
http://apps.stlpublicradio.org/ferguson-project/evidence.html
That would settle so many things! It would weed out the bad cops and help the police regain the trust of citizens.All of this could have been prevented if all law enforcement were forced to wear cameras while on duty. It's such an easy, logical solution.
Charge him with what though? He was being attacked and I don't understand why people are making a big deal about how many shots were fired. If a guy that size was coming at me, I'd want to make sure that I got him because if I didn't, he might kill me. Was it excessive? Maybe but had he listened the first time he'd be alive today.As a black male I think the jury got it right and wrong. I don't think the cop should have been charged with murder but I do think he should have been charged. I can understand shooting someone once or twice or even three times to stop him. But this cop shot him 12 times. You mean to tell me if you were trying to stop him you couldn't have shot him in the leg or knee cap to stop him from coming. 12 shots IMO is a bit to much and that's the only thing I take issue too.
On a side note once again it is a shame to see my race acting the way we are and yet it is a minority that acts this way but in the long run it makes us all look bad because that small minority is how America see the majority even when we don't act like that.
It's a bad situation all around. I'm not gonna be one of those people that are like, any black person shot by a cop is automatically innocent because we all know that's ********, from living in Gary, Indiana I can vouch for it being so, but I would like to see some kind of justification, like aside from just conjecture.
One of the gems from the 70 hours of testimony from the Grand Jury.
http://apps.stlpublicradio.org/ferguson-project/evidence.html
All of this could have been prevented if all law enforcement were forced to wear cameras while on duty. It's such an easy, logical solution.
But then they'd have to be held accountable for their actions and we know the police force here in America don't want that at all.
As a black male I think the jury got it right and wrong. I don't think the cop should have been charged with murder but I do think he should have been charged. I can understand shooting someone once or twice or even three times to stop him. But this cop shot him 12 times. You mean to tell me if you were trying to stop him you couldn't have shot him in the leg or knee cap to stop him from coming. 12 shots IMO is a bit to much and that's the only thing I take issue too.
On a side note once again it is a shame to see my race acting the way we are and yet it is a minority that acts this way but in the long run it makes us all look bad because that small minority is how America see the majority even when we don't act like that.
One of the gems from the 70 hours of testimony from the Grand Jury.
http://apps.stlpublicradio.org/ferguson-project/evidence.html