Seriously? This is all grasping at straws.
Let's look at what we do know:
Michael Brown was a criminal who had just stole from a convenience store, and was clearly violent in doing so.
He and his friend were walking in the middle of the street (another crime, but whatever) and the officer initially confronted them telling them to get off the street. The criminals themselves admitted they refused and were uncooperative. I can send you a link verifying this.
Here are some more stone cold facts. According to documented police records, the order of events are as follows:
11:53: the call comes in about the convenience store robbery
11:57: the description of said thieves goes out, describing exactly what Brown was wearing
12:00: Wilson radios in asking if the other officers need backup to find said suspects, clearly showing he had heard the previous dispatches
Unspecified times: Wilson sees Brown and Johnson jaywalking and yells at them to get back in the sidewalk: according to Johnson's own admission, they refused and were uncooperative
12:02: Wilson requests backup (what a strange thing to request for two simple jaywalkers?) after allegedly recognizing Brown as the suspect in question.
At this point, in the official story, Wilson tells them to get onto the street but then realizes Brown is matching the description of the aforementioned robber in the convenience store. He then reverses his car and gets out either to confront him about the jaywalking or the robbery (depending on which story you encounter; either way, clearly the two were disruptive and uncooperative) and an assault continues. That being said, I feel like common sense would tell you to believe the story of the guy with the gun, badge, and spotless record as opposed to the people who had just committed a crime mere minutes beforehand.
After that, the rest is history.
I'm sorry but the stone cold facts that we do have just don't support this outrage a lot of people seem to find themselves in, and the jury appears to agree with me. And I say that as someone that does not know everything involved with this case. People need to quit looting in the name of a supposed "martyr" who was clearly a criminal to begin with. People need to stop making this race thing. An unarmed teenager died and while that is tragic, it isn't all that ridiculous, crazy, or unheard of considering he attacked somebody with a gun to begin with.
Also if I had a gun and someone were reaching for it, I wouldn't exactly expect that their fingerprints were on the gun as I might be dead if that were the case.