Regardless of whether someone should have been hired based on their sexuality in the first place, the issue of her not being lesbian enough being the cause for harassment is an example of why youll never be able to please these people.
Melissa has impressed me on more than one occasion, both on Supergirl and in other projects, but she's pretty much the only one. Most CW leads are "decent" which is all they need to be I guess. If she's decent, I'll be satisfied.
These people are a hypocritical, vocal minority. They dont speak for everyone who wants a little more diversity in their media.
Is Demi Lovato a lesbian? And is she out now? If so, why did Ruby Rose out her? What business was it of hers?
It's more about whether she's capable enough for me, which I'm beginning to think not.I just want to hear about the show... How close is the costume going to be to the comics? Will she be as pale? Are they keeping her origin and military background? What are they doing for villains and with they start with Alice/Beth?
There are more important things than who is gay enough.
I still don't get the whole "not gay enough" thing. Has she ever even implied that she was bi or straight?
Getting off that topic, who thinks that if Batwoman is set on SG's Earth that they may just meld her origin with Bruce Wayne's and have no Batman on E38 at all?
It's an entirely different universe, and certainly the comics have shown gender flips in the past when a superhero crosses over to one of these others. Doing so would allow a Batman to exist on Earth 1 either currently or in the future, or on some other Earth.
I know canonically Batman is a big influence on Kane in her choice of garb and identity, but I don't think it would take much to meld their origins. Have her join the military and then get kicked out, then as she wanders after that they can move her along a Bruce Wayne-style arc, getting tangled up in the criminal underworld and then using what would become her fear of bats for the symbol she uses.
This is a thing, but Katie is an all time crush, so I role with that adorableness.My biggest worry is that we are going to have another Katie McGrath issue, and she is constantly choking on her accent.
You fundamentally change the character of Batwoman if you change her origin. Her entire origin is tied to her tragedy, her relationship with her father and sister, being kicked out of the army, her spiral into chaos, and then one night seeing Batman. Then her ruthless training begins, which is nothing like Batman's. This is before we get into how she operates in general. How she pushes back against the idea of working with Batman.You're not the only one.
And it's not implied, but pretty certain instead. Ruby Rose hasn't been shy, nor should she be, about her being lesbian/bi/fluid. (New term for me in regards to the LGBT stuff. < And I may have left out a letter...)
Getting off that topic, who thinks that if Batwoman is set on SG's Earth that they may just meld her origin with Bruce Wayne's and have no Batman on E38 at all?
It's an entirely different universe, and certainly the comics have shown gender flips in the past when a superhero crosses over to one of these others. Doing so would allow a Batman to exist on Earth 1 either currently or in the future, or on some other Earth.
I know canonically Batman is a big influence on Kane in her choice of garb and identity, but I don't think it would take much to meld their origins. Have her join the military and then get kicked out, then as she wanders after that they can move her along a Bruce Wayne-style arc, getting tangled up in the criminal underworld and then using what would become her fear of bats for the symbol she uses.
My biggest worry is that we are going to have another Katie McGrath issue, and she is constantly choking on her accent.