Rumor hidden within the latest and lengthy LITG

The Leaguer said:
There's a difference between sense and lame-ness. The logic behind how Superman conceals his identity is trivial. Jordan's deal is so huge it extends into the "f***ing idiots" realm.

wrong. if one's trivial then they both are.
 
The Leaguer said:
There's a difference between sense and lame-ness. The logic behind how Superman conceals his identity is trivial. Jordan's deal is so huge it extends into the "f***ing idiots" realm.


Well the logic behind Hal Jordan's return is trivial as well. He's back thats it. Again, just ebcause its a comic book doesn't excuse every lame concept. "Why did it take Superman an hour and a half to rip a Starro off that dude's neck? Because its a comic book."
 
sinewave said:
wrong. if one's trivial then they both are.
Wrong.

Darthphere said:
Well the logic behind Hal Jordan's return is trivial as well. He's back thats it. Again, just ebcause its a comic book doesn't excuse every lame concept. "Why did it take Superman an hour and a half to rip a Starro off that dude's neck? Because its a comic book."
You're insane if you think a six-issue miniseries is as trivial as something that is barely mentioned ever, if at all. That Starro thing and the yellow bug would both be important plot points, massive ones in the case of the yellow bug. Superman's method of identity concealment is comparitively insignificant.
 
I know, I couldn't quite match the might of "if one's trivial they both are."
 
*leaves, watches behind protective glass, hopes The Question shows up*
 
The Leaguer said:
I know, I couldn't quite match the might of "if one's trivial they both are."

it's called a debate. look it up.

you throw out an opinion that comics don't have to make sense in one post and then claim that a lack of a solid excuse for why clark kent has never been outed as supes is any less trivial than hal jordan's allergy to yellow in another? and when i point it out the best you can come up with is, "wrong". well done!
 
That's not debate, that's called not having anything to say, so you just restate your position without a single shred of support at all and hope that the opposition doesn't notice. Well, I noticed, Petunia, your sad substition for an argument won't fly. I'd say try hard or don't try at all, but it's clear you already chose the second option.

Phere takes what I said about one thing and tries to apply that a different thing, and you run with that like a handicapped kid in the Special Olympics. The problem with that is that, just like that handicapped kid, the first hurdle just smacked you in the face: your theft of another poster's argument left you without perspective on any original context.

I said that Superman's identity concealment didn't have to make sense, because it's comics, that kind of thing should just be taken for granted. Phere responded to that, and you, making up for what you apparently lack in your ability to come up with your own arguments with desire to own me, tried to follow up on that without really understand what I said.

And your response? The equivalent of that same handicapped kid's "duuuuurrr."
 
The Leaguer said:
That's not debate, that's called not having anything to say, so you just restate your position without a single shred of support at all and hope that the opposition doesn't notice. Well, I noticed, Petunia, your sad substition for an argument won't fly. I'd say try hard or don't try at all, but it's clear you already chose the second option.

Phere takes what I said about one thing and tries to apply that a different thing, and you run with that like a handicapped kid in the Special Olympics. The problem with that is that, just like that handicapped kid, the first hurdle just smacked you in the face: your theft of another poster's argument left you without perspective on any original context.

I said that Superman's identity concealment didn't have to make sense, because it's comics, that kind of thing should just be taken for granted. Phere responded to that, and you, making up for what you apparently lack in your ability to come up with your own arguments with desire to own me, tried to follow up on that without really understand what I said.

And your response? The equivalent of that same handicapped kid's "duuuuurrr."


at what point in this *********ory, ego-trip of a post did you explain why anything in a comic book is not trivial? or did you not understand my argument?
 
sinewave said:
at what point in this *********ory, ego-trip of a post did you explain why anything in a comic book is not trivial? or did you not understand my argument?
I decided to give you a little credit and assume you aren't stupid enough to have stopped reading the post you quoted after "Wrong." If I was erroneous in that assumption and you are, in fact, that stupid, tell me, and I'll be more than happy to treat you as if you were even dumber than I've already been treating you.
 
Darthphere said:
*leaves, watches behind protective glass, hopes The Question shows up*

I myself would do it, or at least provoke the situation, but it's too much fun. I haven't had this much fun on the Hype in a while.
 
My mom is never wrong.

*milk and cookies*
 
I'll call you phere if you call me sassin

lol thats so gay
 
Well, to be fair, Dodge (which is my new nickname for Darthphere), lost like...half of his name. So you get to be "Assin."
 
If i looked like you, i'd be assin all over the place :p
 
XD

Well... Let's see... Nickname... It's odd, I usually come up with them fairly easy. (As it is my preferred mode of name calling.)
 
I never came up with a nickname for you, outside of "Flake."
 
Mistress Gluon said:
Well, to be fair, Dodge (which is my new nickname for Darthphere), lost like...half of his name. So you get to be "Assin."


Dodge?:huh:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,382
Messages
22,094,865
Members
45,889
Latest member
Starman68
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"