Scream 4!!!!! - Part 3

Rate the movie!

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1

Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think they're desperate for something with little life in it.
 
I don't want a Scream 5 UNLESS Kevin is onboard and given free creative control. Along with Wes, of course.
 
JP said:
I don't think they're desperate for something with little life in it.
Click to expand...
Piranha's sequel is a sign of desperation. They've done it already. I'm iffy on the prospects of Scream 5 as well, but I can definitely see it happening.

They've also still been muling over another sequel to the Halloween remake, and Halloween 2 tanked HARD. Way harder than this movie.
 
JP said:
No Scream 5, please.
Click to expand...

why??,the franchise obviously still has fans and most of the feedback for 4 has been positive!,IF your saying it cause you don't want it then just ignore it while IF it were to be made&then released.

A Scream 5 being released would not affect your life,fans could still end up enjoying even a part 5 while haters could just move on and focus on movies they are interested in!,no need to wish for no 5th film cause YOU don't want it!
 
JP IS an Fan of the Scream franchise. He's not a hater. The first thing he did after seeing 4 was messaged me what he thought. I'm with him but to a lesser extent about the prospects of Scream 5. I'm fine either way. But I'm definitely in the same stance I was when they announced this one. Iffy.
 
Would Neve be back for a 5? I thought she didn't want to do 4.
 
I think if it's a good story, they should bring it on. I just have no idea how they can move forward with another after the ending of this one.
 
I feel the same way I felt after I saw Kick-Ass (which I also loved) in that I don't really see a need for a sequel, yet all the fans seem to want one. I'm not against the prospect, but I just don't think it's necessary. Especially after such a definitive ending.
 
JP said:
I feel the same way I felt after I saw Kick-Ass (which I also loved) in that I don't really see a need for a sequel, yet all the fans seem to want one. I'm not against the prospect, but I just don't think it's necessary. Especially after such a definitive ending.
Click to expand...
It's the same thing as Scream 3 with me. The only reason I got behind 4 was it had such a good idea behind it and the original cast was back, even though Scream 3 was a definitive ending.

It's the same with Scream 4 with me. Another definitive ending, but there's a prospect of another one and I'm iffy just like I was when Scream 4 was announced. It's just at some point it has to stop, before it really does devolve into a typical horror franchise with bad installments.
 
DACrowe said:
I like both Gale and Dewy. I'd hate for either to go if someone should have went [blackout]Sid, my fave of the trio, had a perfect send off when Jill "killed her" in Scream 4.[/blackout]

With that said, I'd accept Gale going before Dewy. Dewy is just too sweet and affable to be killed off. That is why Wes and Williamson brought him back to life in the final shot as an afterthought in the first film. If they were to kill Dewy, they had a great opportunity in Scream 2 (now THAT was a death scene!), but he lived. He's just too much fun. Plus he and Neve Campbell were putting a lot of effort on screen for Scream 4. I felt like Courtney Cox, even with her reduced screentime, seemed to be coasting in this one as Gale.

If someone had to go, it should be Gale. In fact, I thought Gale was going to die at Stabathon. When she lived, I decided the original were invincible....and then I grew sad that Randy was the only survivor of of the original film that wasn't....Randy was my favorite.
Click to expand...

Maybe IF Gail gets killed off first in the next one then perhaps Dewy will man up and be a bad-ass now???,Dewy could be really damn pissed that Gail got murdered all of a sudden and him&Sidney are going through trouble with a Ghostface for a 5th time and so he's had enough!

He could still be pretty much the same But just a bit more serious and be an action hero cop for a bit(I'd love to see Dewy have a car chase scene with Ghost face AND maybe a fight scene)then gets killed off or survives even in a 6th to end a new trilogy as him as the hero Sheriff that retires and evolves from goofy deputy in the original into a bad-ass hero Sheriff!
 
JustABill said:
It's the same thing as Scream 3 with me. The only reason I got behind 4 was it had such a good idea behind it and the original cast was back, even though Scream 3 was a definitive ending.

It's the same with Scream 4 with me. Another definitive ending, but there's a prospect of another one and I'm iffy just like I was when Scream 4 was announced. It's just at some point it has to stop, before it really does devolve into a typical horror franchise with bad installments.
Click to expand...
Well, Scream 4 would never have worked if it came right after Scream 3. The 11 years were competently necessary, IMO. If they make a Scream 5, I feel like it can only work if they wait another 5 or so years. That way it can once again provide a commentary on the state of horror movies.
 
JP said:
I feel the same way I felt after I saw Kick-Ass (which I also loved) in that I don't really see a need for a sequel, yet all the fans seem to want one. I'm not against the prospect, but I just don't think it's necessary. Especially after such a definitive ending.
Click to expand...

The difference is that I think there are at least two really good stories that can still be told with the Kick-Ass characters (which I mentioned in detail in its thread in Marvel Films). Honestly, a Kick-Ass trilogy to me (if done right) would be the Scream films of the superhero genre. It is unfortunate that the sequels are being left on the page, solely in the hands of Mark Millar who is not nearly as clever or fun as Matthew Vaughn and Jane Goldman are.

With Scream 5, I admit continuing after the ending of Scream 4 seems hard. Scream 4 is a perfectly fine ending for the franchise and far more satisfying a conclusion than Scream 3 was. However, I admit to loving the idea of seeing another Scream film in the near future.
 
JP said:
Well, Scream 4 would never have worked if it came right after Scream 3. The 11 years were competently necessary, IMO. If they make a Scream 5, I feel like it can only work if they wait another 5 or so years. That way it can once again provide a commentary on the state of horror movies.
Click to expand...
But they also kind of risk coming back at a time when horror is dead, like it was with the first Scream by doing that. I understand what you are saying, but there are times when horror just dies out all together.
 
I honestly don't think 5 would be a good idea for the franchise. 4 did just enough to warrant a sequel, and maintain the cultural relevancy surrounding each narrative. Following up this -- I don't see any feasible grounds of carving something new that wasn't already covered or parodied.

Plus there's the whole "Who's Ghostface" subplot that's integral to the entire movie. Motive-wise, I feel like whatever they decide to it's just going to end up being as ridiculous as how the Saw franchise got.
 
I think the last shot should have been Sid/Dewy&Gail for it to be even more of a definitive ending!,I had mix reactions about Jill's dead face being the last shot.
 
I loved Jill's dead face being the last shot. It was perfection. And really sent home the whole message of her spree.
 
well I guess it could also connect to Sidney's line"Don't F**k with the Original",perhaps that shot could be seen as death to remakes!?
 
Yeah, I don't know how they would make a sequel.

That is why I hope Charlie somehow survives.
 
He's deader than Kirby. Stabbed in the heart. Then stabbed again. If it weren't for Roman he'd be the lamest of the killers. He just seemed like a really expendable pawn controlled by Jill.
 
Charlie reminded me a lot of Stu from number 1. They're just in it as a pawn and because of peer pressure though I guess in this case Charlie was probably gettin some.
 
Maybe we can just do a new Scream every 10 years. :o
 
JustABill said:
He's deader than Kirby. Stabbed in the heart. Then stabbed again. If it weren't for Roman he'd be the lamest of the killers. He just seemed like a really expendable pawn controlled by Jill.
Click to expand...

Probaly was promised to him. it would've been kinda obvious if they were seen together.
 
Anybody else, particulary guys, just feel sick when:

Jill shot her ex in his man parts

Granted, there were a lot of graphic stuff going on in the movie BUT that particular shot seriously put me in a bad mood.

Then I heard Eric Cartmans voice in my head, lol.

[YT]-B_W12FgCLY[/YT]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

T
  • Poll Poll
Scream 4!!!!! - Part 4
16 17 18
Replies
442
Views
37K
John Locke
John Locke
T
  • Locked
  • Poll Poll
Scream 4!!!!! - Part 4
39 40 41
Replies
1K
Views
71K
Thread Manager
T
T
  • Locked
Scream 4!!!!!
38 39 40
Replies
999
Views
72K
Thread Manager
T
T
  • Locked
Ghostbusters 3 - Part 4
39 40 41
Replies
1K
Views
60K
Thread Manager
T
T
  • Poll Poll
Disney's Frozen - Part 4
10 11 12
Replies
296
Views
21K
Erzengel
Erzengel

Staff online

Members online

Total: 3,030 (members: 25, guests: 3,005)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,310
Messages
22,083,669
Members
45,883
Latest member
marvel2099fan89

Share this page

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"