I really think they should keep the tradition alive and have a different actor playing Bruce Banner every time he pops up.
This is a dumb thread, of course he would be cast in a Hulk sequel if it were to happen.
Mark Ruffalo's six movie contract should include Avengers 1-3 and Defenders 1-3.
I don't see another hulk film anytime soon however. Marvel's already taken two shots at a solo film and they both under-performed while hulk's supporting role in the avengers was a great success.
So i think marvel's taken the hint on which direction to keep hulk in.
I really think they should keep the tradition alive and have a different actor playing Bruce Banner every time he pops up.
They made neither Banner nor the Hulk all that likeable. I'm okay with Banner not being too likeable, but a mindless, voiceless Hulk is way less fun than a Hulk with personality. They got closer to that personality in Avengers, but they've still stuck to the mindless rage beast for the most part. I think a Hulk movie where Hulk actually has a personality separate and often counter to Banner's would be much better received.Why did Hulk's solo fiilms not do as well at the box office. I mean, both films did make a lot of money, but nowhere near as much as Iron man did. What's up with that?
exactly, thread closed.I really think they should keep the tradition alive and have a different actor playing Bruce Banner every time he pops up.
exactly, thread closed.
Why did Hulk's solo fiilms not do as well at the box office. I mean, both films did make a lot of money, but nowhere near as much as Iron man did. What's up with that?