The Amazing Spider-Man Should Spidey-3 be retconned?

Should Spider-Man 3 be retconned on any level?

  • It may be ugly, but Spider-Man 4 should respect even the worst continuity choices.

  • Spider-Man 4 shouldn't retcon 3 exactly..instead the events of 3 simply do not require mention.

  • Create a Plot for 4 that acknowledges the events of 3 but isn't bound to them. (minor retcon)

  • A complete retcon would be the best option, however unrealistic.

  • Wait..what? I like Spider-Man 3..no retconning is needed..at all.


Results are only viewable after voting.
and die another day lead to casino royale which was a reboot. right?
Except Spidey 3 wasn't an abomination like Die Another Day.

And whatever lame scenes Spidey 3 had, Batman & Robin was far worst. I raise you a Bat Credit Card.
 
ill see your bat credit card and raise you a jazz piano scene. now dig on that.
 
ill see your bat credit card and raise you a jazz piano scene. now dig on that.
I suppose I'll go all in.

[YT]AJWpmPGCR1c[/YT]

Love your name BTW. Anchorman for the win :up: .
 
The only retcon that should occur that deals with Spider-man 3.... is the stupid retcon of Uncle Ben's murder to include Sandman.
 
So, you're saying one scene was almost as bad?
Weak. :o

the dancing is as bad. as is the random posing in front of the us flag, the broadcaster scenes and the kids screaming wicked awesome!.

couldve been worse though. none of those scenes had rubber nipples in them.

I suppose I'll go all in.



funny enough i just saw that. i lose. i dont wanna subject myself to that kind of pain ever again. time for me to CASH OUT (hahaaha because were talking poker haha)


Love your name BTW. Anchorman for the win :up: .

thanks. i should go back to my anchorman avatar. it was ron lifting 2 weights saying "i did a thousand" classic.
 
the dancing is as bad. as is the random posing in front of the us flag, the broadcaster scenes and the kids screaming wicked awesome!.

couldve been worse though. none of those scenes had rubber nipples in them.

Stronger! :woot:
 
The deaths, both of them, were needed in Spider-Man 3. It's just their storylines that needed some reconstruction.
 
Ben's death re-telling wasn't needed. It was for the first movie and only for that.
 
Last edited:
^^ Well I don't get much agreement with Spidey fans, haha.

And Jick09, Ben's re-telling death wasn't needed, yes, but I was only referring to Harry and Eddie.

The deaths are perfect for Spider-Man 3, it's just the arc for Harry and Eddie that needed a lot of change.

Plus, Sandman's arc needed many changes, thus Ben's re-telling death wouldn't have happen.
 
Well I just say to people that I didn't even enjoy Spider-Man 3; I even fell asleep when I went to see it at the theatres.

And everyone thinks Spider-Man 3 is the Holy Grail or something, lol.
 
Yeah, I know what you mean. I loved the movie, but I went into the theater with the detirmination to enjoy the movie no matter what, and I did. I look past the many flaws and still see a pretty good movie overall. Lol, my little cousin (he was like, 4) fell asleep during the belltower scene.
 
I just hope in spidey 4, they undo 3s retcon of who killed ben. or just drop that idea and the character of sandman so i am never reminded of it. that was the worst thing about spider-man 3 and the only thing that cant be easily fixed.
 
Also my thoughts.
It was like in the comics, after all. And I thought he was meant to die, either way. It was like, his destiny.

Sorry I was am not english and I got the concept of the word "retcon" all wrong... :grin:
 
These movies should not be rebooted/retconned for a long time. Even if they start the series over, we will be getting the playful fun Spidey like we are getting and it won't be a dramatic change like Nolan's series was as it delved into darker territory and Spider-Man is in no way dark and grim.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"