JAK®
Upstart
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Messages
- 7,424
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 58
Why should they do something different if it works for them?the point is that all three are obsessed with only one style. they dont know how to try something different.
Why should they do something different if it works for them?the point is that all three are obsessed with only one style. they dont know how to try something different.
, this looks to have some meat you can chew on after you leave the theater.
I don't mean visually only .

For this reason I'm worried about Superman. The best Superman movies had heart (thanks to Donner and Reeve).
Well people were crying during Armageddon but lets be honest, the "hero sacrifices himself and gives final speech while daughter cries" has to be the easiest tear jerker to pull off.I'll worry when the SHH headline reads Superman Reshoots: Nolan overseeing Snyder filming.
Bay, I think, knows he sucks at emotional filmmaking and really hasn't tried. At least not since the Island.
You "were" excited? What made you not be excited presently?As someone who was super excited about this film, I have to say it looks like complete drivel in good packaging.
Hopefully I'm wrong.
Not to forgot there's a definitive difference between the likability between Bruce Willis and Liv Tyler against Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox and cgi robots.Well people were crying during Armageddon but lets be honest, the "hero sacrifices himself and gives final speech while daughter cries" has to be the easiest tear jerker to pull off.
You "were" excited? What made you not be excited presently?
snyder has had plenty of heart in his films it is sad that people cant see this
people just see his stylistic visual style and it confuses them that a style like that can have some sort of heart
You're comparing an ending scene to an opening scene.Dude's just a visually acute guy, imo. I've never been taking in by the way he films two characters talking. Contrasting his stuff with say the end conversation in X1 with Mags and X. You get a sense of history between the two that's been built up from the opening scene. The Comedian's death read as a guy getting killed. Nothing else. Not a guy used to be the one giving beatdowns losing. Just a guy getting beatdown.
JAK®;19406044 said:You're comparing an ending scene to an opening scene.
You're meant to see The Comedian as just a guy getting killed. You find out more about him in the rest of the movie. This was true in the comic also.
Maybe you should make a better comparison than that.
laurie has anger towards her mother because she was forced into crime fighting at an early age
She does'nt know what to do with her life and is lost as she knows nothing but crime fighting which is why all her friends are crime fighters she cant have any type of relationship because she has been sheltered.
far from 1 dimensional
I think you're applying what Singer successfully intended to do in X-Men to Watchmen, and blaming Snyder for not doing what he hasn't done and never intended to do.Nope. The opening of X1 still portrays the history. The way we don't get to see Mags' face. Every scene in the movie mimcs that. Xavier's fraustration with his old friend. You don't need to know who the Comedian is why he's being attacked to get a sense of who the character is supposed to be. That's what a skilled director does. He can give you a sense of things even before the reveal.
If it makes you feel better.
How about the relationship between Laurie and her mother? It played as one dimensional mother-daughter anger. We don't even approach the parallels of what kind of guys she is attracted to in relationship to how she sees her mother.
snyder has had plenty of heart in his films it is sad that people cant see this
people just see his stylistic visual style and it confuses them that a style like that can have some sort of heart