TheVileOne
Eternal
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2002
- Messages
- 70,762
- Reaction score
- 15,030
- Points
- 103
That’s what I assumed re: killing the admiral in his home too but I don’t think it was ever explicitly confirmed.
Sterns turning himself in to Sam in front of Walter Reed hospital was…jarring. I suppose he wanted to turn himself in so he could expose the truth, but how did he talk to reporters after being arrested? Surely he would have been taken straight to a military black site. Alternatively, if he spoke to reporters / leaked his story prior to turning himself in, why turn himself in at all?
And was Sam waiting for him? All of the sudden, without call or signal, military forces are there and waiting on Sam’s command to arrest Sterns.
Honestly, it probably would have worked better if, after killing Dunphy to hide the truth about the gamma pills, Sterns personally attends President Ross’s press conference (hidden amongst the gathered press) to ensure the truth comes to light and Ross ruins his career; especially after the failure in the Indian Ocean.
Sam, who’s watching the conference live, suits up to fight Red Hulk. While he fights him, Ruth takes down Sterns before he can sip away again.
I guess he arguably could've leaked things to the media deliberately since he was temporarily free and evading authorities. I think the problem is that the movie didn't really clue the audience in and just skipped a few too many steps. Like maybe we could've seen photos in the admiral's home showing the admiral with Ross, and it was like a case of Sterns killing Ross' close friends or advisors. But like we can infer that or maybe interpret that, but the movie obfuscates it a bit too much.