The Amazing Spider-Man "SPIDER-MAN 4 Production on Indefinite Hold "....NOT!...or Maybe?

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's funny how many Kraven fans don't know much about him. He has no super powers. He uses elixirs to enhance his strength (Just say no to drugs). And it's nothing by comparison to Spidey's strength.

And really? Spidey can't dodge bullets? So what was he doing in Sidey 2 when the guy in the car was shooting at him? Getting hit?

I don't care what the hell he uses, all I know is that he has super strength, speed and agility when he takes it. Really, you're going the drug route with this, Curt Connors injects his arm full of chemicals. So cut the BS out about just saying no.

The thing is, Kraven doesn't need to match Spider-Man's strength completely if they give him his killer's edge and skills. Spider-Man doesn't use his strength on people to the fullest or he would have broken every bone in Doc Ock's face in SM2. So I guess Doc Ock is a lame villain too, because he has no powers. If they give Kraven his killer instinct (as a hunter), and actually makes him kill people, this puts him on an even playing field with Spidey. And he's more inclined to take a direct punch because of his enhanced strength than Doc Ock is, it's more believable. By the way, even on Marvel.com, it says that Kraven can lift "2 TONS" that's enough to do damage to even Spider-Man, depending on the skills you're playing with. What, you've never heard of a character name BATMAN, he too fights villains (BANE) with superhuman strength, while he himself has ZILCH! Let me guess, Batman is lame and sucks too, eh?

Yes, Spider-Man cannot dodge bullets, let me repeat that, Spider-Man does not have the super speed of Superman and The Flash. He simply isn't that fast. Allow me to explain what you saw in SM1 and SM2 and in any comic book or cartoon where it looks like he's dodging bullets:

Spider-Man isn't faster than the bullet coming from the gun, Spidey is faster than the person holding the gun. Which means, you have to take aim at Spider-Man in order to hit him. He's actually dodging the moment of one's hand holding the gun. I don't why any Spider-Man fan would think Spider-Man can move as fast as The Flash or Superman, when he can't. When Superman/The Flash moves there's nothing but a faint blur, when have we every seen Spider-Man become nothing but a swift blur of speed? You can't even see a bullet coming from a gun, when the hell have Spidey turned damn-near invisible because of his speed a la Superman and The Flash? :o
 
This killing MJ off rumor is a bunch of bull. They probably should get rid of her, but it makes no sense if this is the last Raimi movie, in the unlikely event they decide to reboot completely. Once SM5-6 is confirmed with this cast, then I MIGHT buy the rumor. I say just have them break up if anything so the sequel doesn't have to pick up with the same couple again and again.
 
Last edited:
Kill MJ and Sam Raimi will be without his sappy romance, I don't see that happening.
 
He'll get his sappy romance with the Vulturess though.

I felt in Spider-Man 3 they were just finding excuses to throw monkey wrenches in Peter and MJ's relationship to create drama so I wouldn't be surprised if they brought in a new love interest.
 
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooo...I can't take another love triangle!
 
©KAW;17867056 said:
I don't care what the hell he uses, all I know is that he has super strength, speed and agility when he takes it. Really, you're going the drug route with this, Curt Connors injects his arm full of chemicals. So cut the BS out about just saying no.

The thing is, Kraven doesn't need to match Spider-Man's strength completely if they give him his killer's edge and skills. Spider-Man doesn't use his strength on people to the fullest or he would have broken every bone in Doc Ock's face in SM2. So I guess Doc Ock is a lame villain too, because he has no powers. If they give Kraven his killer instinct (as a hunter), and actually makes him kill people, this puts him on an even playing field with Spidey. And he's more inclined to take a direct punch because of his enhanced strength than Doc Ock is, it's more believable. By the way, even on Marvel.com, it says that Kraven can lift "2 TONS" that's enough to do damage to even Spider-Man, depending on the skills you're playing with. What, you've never heard of a character name BATMAN, he too fights villains (BANE) with superhuman strength, while he himself has ZILCH! Let me guess, Batman is lame and sucks too, eh?

Yes, Spider-Man cannot dodge bullets, let me repeat that, Spider-Man does not have the super speed of Superman and The Flash. He simply isn't that fast. Allow me to explain what you saw in SM1 and SM2 and in any comic book or cartoon where it looks like he's dodging bullets:

Spider-Man isn't faster than the bullet coming from the gun, Spidey is faster than the person holding the gun. Which means, you have to take aim at Spider-Man in order to hit him. He's actually dodging the moment of one's hand holding the gun. I don't why any Spider-Man fan would think Spider-Man can move as fast as The Flash or Superman, when he can't. When Superman/The Flash moves there's nothing but a faint blur, when have we every seen Spider-Man become nothing but a swift blur of speed? You can't even see a bullet coming from a gun, when the hell have Spidey turned damn-near invisible because of his speed a la Superman and The Flash? :o

Wow. That was long and pointless. Kraven lifts two tons, Spider-Man lifts TEN TONS. Not a threat. And Spider-Man has punched Kraven's lights out more than once. So no, he's not taking a serious punch from Spidey and remaining for the duration.

As for your "is this character lame" nonsense- I never said Kraven was "lame". I said in fact that I'd like to see him in a Spidey film. Just not in the fan-fantasy concept of Kraven vs. Lizard. And it is fantasy. No one involved in the films has even mentioned Kraven, let alone Kraven and Lizard. You might as well be hoping for Sandman and Hydroman.

I'm saying that Kraven alone can't justify a two hundred million dollar blockbuster. He can't create the sort of mayhem that the Goblin. Ock and Sandman have. The Lizard can. Kraven can't. Hell, even the Spec Spidey cartoon (That I'm not a big fan of) showed that Kraven isn't a threat to Spidey thus turning him into The Lion King (Which was pretty dumb).

I don't know about you, but I own every Kraven appearance (Including non-Spidey appearances) and he has never been that hard a fight for Spidey. Maybe a few steps up from Man-Mountain Marko or the Kingpin. But certainly not in the category of the Goblin or Ock, which is what this film franchise demands.

As for speed- Your theory collapses when we look at the fact that Spidey regularly dodges machine gunfire from multiple enemies. Since a spray of bullets is coming from each trigger squeeze, Spidey merely being faster than the gunman wouldn't help. And regarding Superman and the Flash: Of course he isn't as fast as them. There's a difference between Dodging a bullet and being FASTER THAN A SPEEDING BULLET. Spidey can't outrace a bullet as Supes or the Flash can. But he can move before the bullet reaches him. And regardless, Kraven can't move anywhere near that fast.
 
I can't see the studio wanting Kraven as a main villian . So unless Raimi gets his way and his way involves Kraven it's unlikely we wil see that character.
 
for the record in the official marvel handbook it states spidey reflexes are faster then a normal humans by a factor of 15, he can even dodge bullets if far enough away (their words not mine).
 
very true, Spider-Neil

Don't they also outline how it works almost like a sense of smell, in that familiar people will either cause a direct alert or no alert at all.

ex: if Aunt May wanted to kill him, he would not react as subconsciously he has labeled her as safe.

ex. if Norman Osborn came into a room without the intent to hurt Spidey, it would go off as he is labeled as a threat

also

ex. Venom is undetectable as he registers as nothing due to the symbiote being bonded to Peter

With that in mind

Quick movements are recognized as a threat due to their potentially lethal speed of force

Bullets, knives, falling (being able to judge how close he is getting to the ground without seeing)
 
very true, Spider-Neil

Don't they also outline how it works almost like a sense of smell, in that familiar people will either cause a direct alert or no alert at all.

ex: if Aunt May wanted to kill him, he would not react as subconsciously he has labeled her as safe.

ex. if Norman Osborn came into a room without the intent to hurt Spidey, it would go off as he is labeled as a threat

also

ex. Venom is undetectable as he registers as nothing due to the symbiote being bonded to Peter

With that in mind

Quick movements are recognized as a threat due to their potentially lethal speed of force

Bullets, knives, falling (being able to judge how close he is getting to the ground without seeing)

I don't like the 'potential' danger stuff. that is bordering on clairvoyance i.e. spidey's spider sense would go off if a man with a shot gun under his jacket walked by him or if (for example) norman osborn shook peter's hand. it should be direct danger only.
 
Umm...Spidey's Spider Sense is very much like having clairvoyance, and has worked that way many times.
 
Wow. That was long and pointless. Kraven lifts two tons, Spider-Man lifts TEN TONS. Not a threat. And Spider-Man has punched Kraven's lights out more than once. So no, he's not taking a serious punch from Spidey and remaining for the duration.

As for your "is this character lame" nonsense- I never said Kraven was "lame". I said in fact that I'd like to see him in a Spidey film. Just not in the fan-fantasy concept of Kraven vs. Lizard. And it is fantasy. No one involved in the films has even mentioned Kraven, let alone Kraven and Lizard. You might as well be hoping for Sandman and Hydroman.

I'm saying that Kraven alone can't justify a two hundred million dollar blockbuster. He can't create the sort of mayhem that the Goblin. Ock and Sandman have. The Lizard can. Kraven can't. Hell, even the Spec Spidey cartoon (That I'm not a big fan of) showed that Kraven isn't a threat to Spidey thus turning him into The Lion King (Which was pretty dumb).

I don't know about you, but I own every Kraven appearance (Including non-Spidey appearances) and he has never been that hard a fight for Spidey. Maybe a few steps up from Man-Mountain Marko or the Kingpin. But certainly not in the category of the Goblin or Ock, which is what this film franchise demands.

How would you prefer Kraven to be adapted? From this post, it seems that you think he's hardly a formidable opponent for Spider-Man, if at all. He has defeated Spider-Man, if only momentarily, but he's done so nonetheless; it only takes one time. The fact that he is unquestionably weaker than Spider-Man actually makes Kraven more interesting because it gives his character the opportunity to elaborately strategize to defeat him. The guy is used to being the aggressor and proving his superiority, being bested by Spidey and the Lizard could drive him to be even more of a "nut", as you claim, to prove himself to himself further. In addition, as ©KAW has stated, Kraven will kill, which separates him from Spider-Man and gives him an edge over him; this produces an interesting dilemma for Spidey to face, for him to question his own moral code and put pressure on himself to save Connors as soon as he can.

I do agree with you in the belief that the Lizard can provide an equal or greater value of mayhem that previous villains have provided, but him/it alone would feel incomplete as he/it is more of a force of nature than a true villain. Kraven provides the (perhaps, rather ambiguous) villainous component to maximize the drama of the story. Yes, the Lizard is quite strong and durable, but having the Lizard confined to the sewers makes the creature vulnerable, which gives Kraven the opportunity to strategize how to capture and kill it.

Moreover, pitting Kraven against the Lizard isn't just a fan-created fantasy, it's been substantiated in the Spider-Man 3 video game. If anything, that would prevent a Lizard/Kraven subplot in SM4. However, using that logic, Scorpion, Rhino, Electro, and Mysterio won't be used in future sequels, which is possible, but rather improbable.

Thematically, a Spider-Man/Lizard/Kraven story works and given that, it would be an appropriate way to adapt Kraven.
 
Wow. That was long and pointless. Kraven lifts two tons, Spider-Man lifts TEN TONS. Not a threat. And Spider-Man has punched Kraven's lights out more than once. So no, he's not taking a serious punch from Spidey and remaining for the duration.
Kraven has a better chance of taking blows from Spidey than a character with no powers at all, like Doctor Octopus on film. What good is Spider-Man being able to lift 10 tons if he can't knock out a man with no powers?

As for your "is this character lame" nonsense- I never said Kraven was "lame". I said in fact that I'd like to see him in a Spidey film. Just not in the fan-fantasy concept of Kraven vs. Lizard. And it is fantasy. No one involved in the films has even mentioned Kraven, let alone Kraven and Lizard. You might as well be hoping for Sandman and Hydroman.
Actually, one of the producers did mention him, Grant Curtis. But what does that matter, they're as jaded about which villains to use as the fans are.

I'm saying that Kraven alone can't justify a two hundred million dollar blockbuster. He can't create the sort of mayhem that the Goblin. Ock and Sandman have. The Lizard can. Kraven can't. Hell, even the Spec Spidey cartoon (That I'm not a big fan of) showed that Kraven isn't a threat to Spidey thus turning him into The Lion King (Which was pretty dumb).
Get your head out of the cartoons, very much like the writers of the films, even cartoons can have weak writers. What is it with you all and having every villain being a damn spectacle, that's exactly why Spider-Man 3 sucked so much with Sandman, Venom and Goblin Jr. which cost 250 million bucks--helped line pockets, but did nothing for the film quality wise?

And I guess they don't think The Lizard can justify a 200M dollar movie either, being that they've announce that there will be "TWO" villains in SM4.

I don't know about you, but I own every Kraven appearance (Including non-Spidey appearances) and he has never been that hard a fight for Spidey. Maybe a few steps up from Man-Mountain Marko or the Kingpin. But certainly not in the category of the Goblin or Ock, which is what this film franchise demands.
If Doc Ock (whom has no powers) can get punched in the face by Spider-Man, and still have a lot of fight left in him, why can't a man with superhuman strength, speed and agility and in tip-top shape do the same?

As for speed- Your theory collapses when we look at the fact that Spidey regularly dodges machine gunfire from multiple enemies. Since a spray of bullets is coming from each trigger squeeze, Spidey merely being faster than the gunman wouldn't help. And regarding Superman and the Flash: Of course he isn't as fast as them. There's a difference between Dodging a bullet and being FASTER THAN A SPEEDING BULLET. Spidey can't outrace a bullet as Supes or the Flash can. But he can move before the bullet reaches him.
Yet, Spidey gets hit by Doc Ock throwing a money bag at him in SM2. Let me guess, a money bag being thrown at him is faster than bullets from a gun, right, because his ass got hit?

If anything, we're both wrong and Spider-Man's speed is as flawed as his spider-sense.
And regardless, Kraven can't move anywhere near that fast.
You think that actually matters, have you seen the movements of Spider-Man in the films, not exactly the spider-like swift movements I've always imagine during a battle?
 
Last edited:
How would you prefer Kraven to be adapted? From this post, it seems that you think he's hardly a formidable opponent for Spider-Man, if at all. He has defeated Spider-Man, if only momentarily, but he's done so nonetheless; it only takes one time.

Aunt May has defeated Spider-Man. It doesn't mean she should be a major villain in a two hundred million dollar movie.

As for how I'd want Kraven presented- the way he's presented in the source material- that he wants SPIDER-MAN dead, defeated, conquered. Not the Lizard.

The fact that he is unquestionably weaker than Spider-Man actually makes Kraven more interesting because it gives his character the opportunity to elaborately strategize to defeat him. The guy is used to being the aggressor and proving his superiority, being bested by Spidey and the Lizard could drive him to be even more of a "nut", as you claim, to prove himself to himself further.

This is not Kraven's movie. His wanting to prove himself isn't worth the screentime. Spidey's movie threats have been threats for SPIDEY TO OVERCOME. Not vice-versa. The Goblin, Ock, Sandman, even Venom were villains Spidey had to work to overcome from the moment the were onscreen. This story isn't supposed to be "The Little Kraven that Could".

In addition, as ©KAW has stated, Kraven will kill, which separates him from Spider-Man and gives him an edge over him; this produces an interesting dilemma for Spidey to face, for him to question his own moral code and put pressure on himself to save Connors as soon as he can.

As I've said, in that respect you don't need Kraven. The fact that the police want to kill the Lizard is enough of a dilemma for Spidey. And the cops have what Kraven doesn't- the LAW behind them. Spidey fighting Kraven to stop him from killing the Lizard is meaningless. Spidey fighting the police is serious. And Spidey wouldn't have to kill Kraven. Again, he's not that serious a threat.

I do agree with you in the belief that the Lizard can provide an equal or greater value of mayhem that previous villains have provided, but him/it alone would feel incomplete as he/it is more of a force of nature than a true villain.

Really? I don't recall a story where Spidey fought only the Lizard as feeling incomplete (Unless the story merely sucked, like "Torment"). The Lizard is by himself a great villain because of his raw power, agility and fearsome appearance. And it would be a nice change from previous Spidey villains because his motivations aren't "human". No desire for money or power. He simply hates humantity because he hates the humanity within himself. His human side is weak and crippled. And yet he does have his human side, which deserves to be saved. So that's a great dynamic.


Kraven provides the (perhaps, rather ambiguous) villainous component to maximize the drama of the story. Yes, the Lizard is quite strong and durable, but having the Lizard confined to the sewers makes the creature vulnerable, which gives Kraven the opportunity to strategize how to capture and kill it.

Why would the Lizard be confined to the sewers? He may prefer that environment, but he isn't confined to it. And again- this is not Kraven's movie. Spider-Man is the one who has to strategize about how to capture the Lizard. Spider-Man is the one who faces the challenges. Kraven is unnecessary to the story.


Moreover, pitting Kraven against the Lizard isn't just a fan-created fantasy, it's been substantiated in the Spider-Man 3 video game. If anything, that would prevent a Lizard/Kraven subplot in SM4. However, using that logic, Scorpion, Rhino, Electro, and Mysterio won't be used in future sequels, which is possible, but rather improbable.

That Kraven is used as a filler villain in a video game has nothing to do with the films. Every Spidey movie game has made use of Spidey's rogues gallery, with no hint of the studio wanting them for a movie.

Look, I love Kraven, just as I love Silvermame, Molten Man etc. etc. They've all been featured in classic stories. But this simply doesn't justify them for a film. Feature Kraven in a Sinister Six movie. Fine. But he isn't a main villain. With dozens of comics being produced per year, it's fine to devote some comic books to Kraven. It's fine to devote an issue or two to the Mindworm. But these movies come out 2, 3 and now 4 years apart. Kraven isn't worth the wait.

Thematically, a Spider-Man/Lizard/Kraven story works and given that, it would be an appropriate way to adapt Kraven.

I disagree. It's as bad as having Ock not care about Spidey but only wanting revenge on the Green Goblin, as in the rejected Spidey 1 script.

I mean ultimately you can tell a good story by pitting any characters in conflict with each other. There's nothing that suggests that pitting those three would be better than anything else.
 
It's not a Lizard movie either. Like I said, they obviously don't think The Lizard should be alone in a 200 million dollar movie, or they wouldn't be adding a second villain.
 
©KAW;17871742 said:
Kraven has a better chance of taking blows from Spidey than a character with no powers at all, like Doctor Octopus on film. What good is Spider-Man being able to lift 10 tons if he can't knock out a man with no powers?

Ock's four little friends make the difference. They are, collectively stronger than Spider-Man. They also keep Spidey from landing full contact blows on Ock. Kraven has no such protection. And again, as far as visuals, Ocks tentacles can cause damage that Kraven couldn't. You couldn't have an epic battle like the Train Fight with Kraven.

Actually, one of the producers did mention him, Grant Curtis. But what does that matter, they're as jaded about which villains to use as the fans are.

They've mentioned tons of villains in passing. They mentioned the Goblinettes. It doesn't mean you're going to see them on film.

Get your head out of the cartoons, very much like the writers of the films, even cartoons can have weak writers. What is it with you all and having every villain being a damn spectacle, that's exactly why Spider-Man 3 sucked so much with Sandman, Venom and Goblin Jr. which cost 250 million bucks--helped line pockets, but did nothing for the film quality wise?

First, my head isn't in the cartoons. As I said, I don't even really like Spec Spidey. I'm saying that they acknowledged that Kraven isn't a great threat to Spidey. And who says the writers are weak? They're interpreting Kraven based on the source material.

And sorry pal, Spidey 3's problems were not in having villains that were great visuals. That was its saving grace.

And I guess they don't think The Lizard can justify a 200M dollar movie either, being that they've announce that there will be "TWO" villains in SM4.

They likely aren't using the Lizard at all at this point. We don't know which villains are being used. It's only rumored that Raimi wants the Vulture and the studio doesn't.

If Doc Ock (whom has no powers) can get punched in the face by Spider-Man, and still have a lot of fight left in him, why can't a man with superhuman strength, speed and agility and in tip-top shape do the same?

You should already know that Spidey pulls his punches. Especially since MJ was being held captive, so totalling Ock would have meant her death. But Spidey did in fact knock him out during the final fight and knocked him out during the bank fight. But as has been mentioned by Joker, the A.I. of the tentacles revive him. It even shows the tentacles lifting his unconscioous body and then he awakes after being thrown into the taxi.

Yet, Spidey gets hit by Doc Ock throwing a money bag at him in SM2. Let me guess, a money bag being thrown at him is faster than bullets from a gun, right, because his ass got hit?

So I guess you also want to debate nearly 50 years of comics continuity then- because that's what been happening in the comics for nearly 5 decades. One could argue that Spidey's Spider sense is that much more acute when dealing with gunfire, since while he can survive being hit by a bag of coins, he can't survive a barrage of bullets.

If anything, we're both wrong and Spider-Man's speed is as flawed as his spider-sense.

No, you're wrong. I said he can dodge bullets, and he can.

You think that actually matters, have you seen the movements of Spider-Man in the films, not exactly the spider-like swift movements I've always imagine during a battle?

Yeah, actually they are pretty swift. But he's fighting villains who can match his speed on some level. The Goblin was as strong and fast as Spidey. Ock's tentacles react at the speed of thought. Sandman's fluid body can move as fast as Spidey's as well. And we all know about Venom. Kraven isn't in any of their class. Why do you think that in the story which presented Kraven's greatest victory over Spidey he needed such an elaborate set up: and... A GUN? (Not to mention Spidey being written as a total dumbass)
 
Kraven IMO,should be a psychopath. He has no morals or code of ethics. He lives to hunt and kill,what he does,he collects their head as his trophy. He generally doesnt kill people,but if anybody gets in his way,he will do so.

I had a scene in mind that he hunts and kills 3 Lions that are terrorising a small village in Africa, kills them bare-handed. The local police hunt him and he kills them too,thats when he finds out about The Lizard in NYC. Calypso should be a minor character as well,who supplies Kraven with his potions,as he realises he cant defeat Spider-Man and Lizard singlehandedly. The potions give him the strength,speed,agility and stamina of Animals,but cause his little remaining sanity to deplete.
 
I don't like the 'potential' danger stuff. that is bordering on clairvoyance i.e. spidey's spider sense would go off if a man with a shot gun under his jacket walked by him or if (for example) norman osborn shook peter's hand. it should be direct danger only.

I'm just outlining the comics

Man with shotgun would not be a threat until he fired the gun at spidey. If the man with the shotgun were on the street or in a public area, spidey would not notice him until the gun was fired at him. (aiming it would not cause a sense of danger but the speed of the shells and sound of the shot would)

Now, if the same man with the shotgun were in Peter's house. His sense would go off minimally as it would detect that there is a strange person in a place he normally would consider vacant or occupied with people he knows.

This is outlined two times specifically. In One More Day, when the sniper is waiting to take his shot at Peter at the Motel, and in a storyline back at the end of the Clone Saga when Norm tries to drug peter via his toothpaste. He released a counter pheromone to throw off his spider-sense.

Keep in mind, in the comic books, his sticking to walls is explained through a controlled magnetic field his body generates so the science behind it requires a leap from the reader.

I know it's been debated on this forum about the movies not being true to this, but again, you could take a leap of faith and come to a loose-logic conclusion to why his spider-sense did not fire in certain instances

SM2 is basically a write off due to his powers being unpredictable.
 
Ock's four little friends make the difference. They are, collectively stronger than Spider-Man. They also keep Spidey from landing full contact blows on Ock. Kraven has no such protection. And again, as far as visuals, Ocks tentacles can cause damage that Kraven couldn't. You couldn't have an epic battle like the Train Fight with Kraven.
Doc Ock four friends didn't keep Spidey from landing multiple blows to his face on the clock tower.
They've mentioned tons of villains in passing. They mentioned the Goblinettes. It doesn't mean you're going to see them on film.
Even when we finally get The Lizard, unlike Ock and GG, he won't be alone. My fear is them picking the wrong secondary villain if The Lizard is the villain. My gut feeling is telling me The Lizard and Black Cat.
First, my head isn't in the cartoons. As I said, I don't even really like Spec Spidey. I'm saying that they acknowledged that Kraven isn't a great threat to Spidey. And who says the writers are weak? They're interpreting Kraven based on the source material.
The greatest threat in that cartoon is probably Tombstone, who slapped Spidey eye to eye, which is why I see why you don't like the show. No ones a threat if you half ass the writing. I don't like any of the A-Listers in that toon.
And sorry pal, Spidey 3's problems were not in having villains that were great visuals. That was its saving grace.
Yes, a saving grace for Raimi & Sony's pockets. But for the audience at large, it wasn't worth trying to be saved with over blown CGI. It needed a great script. These so called great visuals that you seek did absolutely nothing to save that film.
They likely aren't using the Lizard at all at this point. We don't know which villains are being used. It's only rumored that Raimi wants the Vulture and the studio doesn't.
Yes, that's what I said about SM3, The Lizard will definitely be in this one, and most likely by himself sense it worked better for the other two films. Yet, I'm still waiting. We'll see, after everyone thought that Sandman being Uncle Ben's killer was a rumor, I'm not putting anything pass Raimi & Friends...this includes The Vulture, Sony not wanting The Lizard because we wouldn't see Connors' face (which is why we have a maskless Spider-Man running around in every flick) and his daughter Vultress or Vulturette or whomever. :dry:
You should already know that Spidey pulls his punches. Especially since MJ was being held captive, so totalling Ock would have meant her death. But Spidey did in fact knock him out during the final fight and knocked him out during the bank fight. But as has been mentioned by Joker, the A.I. of the tentacles revive him. It even shows the tentacles lifting his unconscioous body and then he awakes after being thrown into the taxi.
Yeah, let's call upon the A.I. tentacles when things don't make sense, Doc Ock should be in a comma after being hit by Spider-Man, now you wanna play pulling punches. But with Kraven, who has superhuman strength gets punched (who's endurance is much greater than that of Ock's), I get no deal.
So I guess you also want to debate nearly 50 years of comics continuity then- because that's what been happening in the comics for nearly 5 decades. One could argue that Spidey's Spider sense is that much more acute when dealing with gunfire, since while he can survive being hit by a bag of coins, he can't survive a barrage of bullets.
Come on, I'm good for it. Ock shouldn't be able to lift heavy objects in the comics (for nearly 50 years) because the weight of huge objects would crush his lower body, yet, he does it like he has super strength. And I'll debate Spider-Man being able to dodge bullets like an Agent from The Matrix, as well. What's continuity if it make no sense in occurrence to the character's powers. Should he start flying too.
No, you're wrong. I said he can dodge bullets, and he can.
Okay, so he's The Flash...I get you.
Yeah, actually they are pretty swift. But he's fighting villains who can match his speed on some level. The Goblin was as strong and fast as Spidey. Ock's tentacles react at the speed of thought. Sandman's fluid body can move as fast as Spidey's as well. And we all know about Venom. Kraven isn't in any of their class. Why do you think that in the story which presented Kraven's greatest victory over Spidey he needed such an elaborate set up: and... A GUN? (Not to mention Spidey being written as a total dumbass)
Yeah, okay, how fast was Spidey when the Goblin gassed him at the Daily Bugle. Where was this swift movement you speak of? Not as fast as dodging a bullet then, the fool was gassed and falling to his death. And The Goblin gassed him slower than the crawl of a newborn.

The swiftness of Ock's tentacles should have blocked all of Spidey's blows during the clock tower fight. Yeah, his tentacles react at the speed of thought, eh, what was Ock thinking...I want to get punched multiple times in the face?

Sandman's abilities has nothing to do with speed at all, the guy is pretty much indestructible. He's actually, the toughest Spider-Man villain to beat in these films, but don't tell that to a Doc Ock or Green Goblin fan, they'll bring up the vacuum cleaner.

Yes, we all know Venom, whom you also said Spider-Man was written like a total dumbass when he kicks Spidey's ass. Now, it's Kraven. You wanna just make a list of the villains that you don't think should ever kick Spider-Man's ass in the comics. And why would I care about how a villain beats Spider-Man, I don't care if they use bombs, razor bats, toss the head of Gwen Stacy around, hide Mary Jane's feet in the cookie jar or use a crowbar, they're freakin' villains.
 
Last edited:
Aunt May has defeated Spider-Man. It doesn't mean she should be a major villain in a two hundred million dollar movie.

There's no major fan campaign for Aunt May to be a villain either. Having her as such is much more ridiculous than Kraven be one, an actual villain with fan support.

As for how I'd want Kraven presented- the way he's presented in the source material- that he wants SPIDER-MAN dead, defeated, conquered. Not the Lizard.

That can still be accomplished in the story.

This is not Kraven's movie. His wanting to prove himself isn't worth the screentime. Spidey's movie threats have been threats for SPIDEY TO OVERCOME. Not vice-versa. The Goblin, Ock, Sandman, even Venom were villains Spidey had to work to overcome from the moment the were onscreen. This story isn't supposed to be "The Little Kraven that Could".

As I've said, in that respect you don't need Kraven. The fact that the police want to kill the Lizard is enough of a dilemma for Spidey. And the cops have what Kraven doesn't- the LAW behind them. Spidey fighting Kraven to stop him from killing the Lizard is meaningless. Spidey fighting the police is serious. And Spidey wouldn't have to kill Kraven. Again, he's not that serious a threat.

Of course it's worth the screentime. The difference between Kraven and the cops is small; they both want the Lizard dead and will devise a way to do so. The Lizard presents a great threat to public safety and health, enough for law enforcement to consult someone with more experience in successfully hunting large beasts, someone like Kraven.

Really? I don't recall a story where Spidey fought only the Lizard as feeling incomplete (Unless the story merely sucked, like "Torment"). The Lizard is by himself a great villain because of his raw power, agility and fearsome appearance. And it would be a nice change from previous Spidey villains because his motivations aren't "human". No desire for money or power. He simply hates humantity because he hates the humanity within himself. His human side is weak and crippled. And yet he does have his human side, which deserves to be saved. So that's a great dynamic.
Each one of these films has a strategic and physical threat for Spider-Man:

SM1
Green Goblin - both

SM2
Dr. Octopus - both

SM3 -
New Goblin - both
Sandman - physical threat
Venom - both

If the Lizard is involved in SM4, the physical threat requirement is satisfied, which leaves the strategic threat. Yes, law enforcement could provide some semblance of that, which is why I believe that they should be involved, but Kraven should as well, as they share the similar mission of wanting to catch the Lizard, and like I said above, he has the expertise to make it happen. This puts Spider-Man at odds with both entities more, since he would probably be seen as enabling the Lizard while he attempts to help him, making him more of a villain in their, and maybe even the city's, opinion. It gives Spidey a different, perhaps more difficult situation to overcome, which would be an appropriate plot in that each film should provide a greater threat than the one prior. He's never had to deal with mounting disapproval by the public and law enforcement, all while trying to stop and save a mentor that's become an uncontrollable monster before a madman (with and/or without police approval) with a penchant for hunting wild game can do so. That's dynamically dramatic and would be a welcome change in the series.

That Kraven is used as a filler villain in a video game has nothing to do with the films. Every Spidey movie game has made use of Spidey's rogues gallery, with no hint of the studio wanting them for a movie.
If that's the case, then Black Cat, who was used in the Spider-Man 2 game, would not have been rumored to be in SM4. It is also arguable that at least Mysterio would be a formidable foe for Spidey to face in a future film (no alliteration intended).

Look, I love Kraven, just as I love Silvermame, Molten Man etc. etc. They've all been featured in classic stories. But this simply doesn't justify them for a film. Feature Kraven in a Sinister Six movie. Fine. But he isn't a main villain. With dozens of comics being produced per year, it's fine to devote some comic books to Kraven. It's fine to devote an issue or two to the Mindworm. But these movies come out 2, 3 and now 4 years apart. Kraven isn't worth the wait.
This is just where we differ. Since Kraven has been featured in a classic story (KLH), that and/or he should be adapted. These movies are a different monster than the comics; you take the best elements from the plethora of canon that's been produced in a character's history and place them within a story that would provide a reasonable progression for the main character in the context of the series. Some things may be omitted or altered, but as long as the essences of the characters remain, and better if the characters can be improved upon, a story can be successfully told. Involving Kraven in a Lizard story could have such an outcome.

I disagree. It's as bad as having Ock not care about Spidey but only wanting revenge on the Green Goblin, as in the rejected Spidey 1 script.

I mean ultimately you can tell a good story by pitting any characters in conflict with each other. There's nothing that suggests that pitting those three would be better than anything else.
If it's a good story, that finally allows a character to become the wild creature fans know him to be after 2 movies after subtly hinting at it (Dr. Connors into the Lizard as there is what resembles a reptilian skeleton in the background of a scene in Spider-Man 3), which gives Peter and Spidey tougher obstacles to overcome, namely taming and curing the beast before it can be killed by a character that has the expertise to do so (Kraven), then it should be told, especially if the studio has seen potential in pitting the three against each other (Spider-Man 3 video game, once again).

It's a story that makes each main character (Spider-Man, the Lizard, Kraven) a bit more complicated and introduces more shades of grey to them than characters/villains that are solely evil to be evil (SM1), evil for hire (SM2), or evil for revenge (SM3); each character is just being, which places them at odds with one another. If Raimi and co. has a story that can meet or best the dramatic possibilities of this potential story, then I'd be interested as well. However, this story just feels like a natural, logical progression of the series that gives Peter and Spider-Man a situation to grow from, so they'd be hard-pressed to create a story that piques my interest as much as this one.
 
sam raimi sucks he's ruined my favorite childhood character a reboot with james cameron at the helm can't come soon enough
 
sam raimi sucks he's ruined my favorite childhood character a reboot with james cameron at the helm can't come soon enough
You've read the script for Cameron's Spidey movie, right? :o
 
It should be a crime to bash Raimi and then recommend Cameron for Spider-Man in the same sentence.

I love Cameron but his concept for Spider-Man was trash.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,277
Messages
22,078,836
Members
45,878
Latest member
Remembrance1988
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"