shinlyle
King of the Haters
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2003
- Messages
- 13,581
- Reaction score
- 2,009
- Points
- 103
I unliked this so I could like it again. Awesome cover!!!
Because he's dead, no? At this point, doing constant callbacks to Uncle Ben would come down to ad nauseam repetition, considering that he that simply won't be factoring into the story anymore. Anything meaningful Uncle Ben-related, outside of some sort of retcon, we've already seen in previous films that aren't that old yet.
Remember Harry oscorp use to ask why peter wasn’t crying about uncle Ben a full year after he became Spider-Man? And thought he was retconned?
He’s not retconned. It’s implied something happened.
Peter tells Ned that after all that’s happened aunt may would freak if peter was Spider-Man
And when iron man asked why peter is Spider-Man, he looks very sad and tells tony that when bad things happen or something. Can’t remember
An implication doesn't offer input on the character based situations it has on a Peter. We get an idea, but to anyone who doesn't know, that idea doesn't offer much.Remember Harry oscorp use to ask why peter wasn’t crying about uncle Ben a full year after he became Spider-Man? And thought he was retconned?
He’s not retconned. It’s implied something happened.
Peter tells Ned that after all that’s happened aunt may would freak if peter was Spider-Man
And when iron man asked why peter is Spider-Man, he looks very sad and tells tony that when bad things happen or something. Can’t remember
That doesn't offer a strong connection to the situation. In this, that could mean any number of things."When you can do what I do, and you don't, and then the bad things happen....they happen because of you."
Fitting the usual version, in that his inaction about a thief led to Ben getting killed.
Those versions aren't this.People really need to get over this Uncle Ben nonsense. Go re-read his death in the comics or watch the Raimi or Webb films for your fix.
As a hardcore Spider-Man fan like most on here, we know how important Ben is as well as his passing in relation to Peter. We just don't need to see it again nor have it mentioned throughout all the current Sony/MS films multiple times.
I don't think that has strong meaning in connection with an idea that's more hinted at than delved in to, to me.The hell you mean it could be any number of things. Look uncle Ben is in the mcu and he died. That whole speech was screaming, uncle Ben died cause of me but it didn’t wanna give to much away . But anyway in the trailer for ffh he uses his suit case. So yea. His initials are literally on the suitcase. So he’s in the mcu and he died. There’s nothing to wonder about
Amen. So no matter how many time Spiderman gets rebooted, you guys want Uncle Ben to die in all of them? That's repetitive. It's good they are trying other things.People really need to get over this Uncle Ben nonsense. Go re-read his death in the comics or watch the Raimi or Webb films for your fix.
As a hardcore Spider-Man fan like most on here, we know how important Ben is as well as his passing in relation to Peter. We just don't need to see it again nor have it mentioned throughout all the current Sony/MS films multiple times.
I just want to hear his name once. That's it. And I'd think there's a good chance we will in FFH with Peter taking is suitcase. No one wants to see him die again. A single direct reference would probably be enough to end most of this debate, or whatever it is. It won't bother me in the slightest if we never see him, we never hear this version of what happened, whatever. But we can't at least see a picture on the wall? It's just weird to avoid a single direct reference so thoroughly.Amen. So no matter how many time Spiderman gets rebooted, you guys want Uncle Ben to die in all of them? That's repetitive. It's good they are trying other things.
I just want to hear his name once. That's it. And I'd think there's a good chance we will in FFH with Peter taking is suitcase. No one wants to see him die again. A single direct reference would probably be enough to end most of this debate, or whatever it is. It won't bother me in the slightest if we never see him, we never hear this version of what happened, whatever. But we can't at least see a picture on the wall? It's just weird to avoid a single direct reference so thoroughly.

Amen. So no matter how many time Spiderman gets rebooted, you guys want Uncle Ben to die in all of them? That's repetitive. It's good they are trying other things.
Wanting the character to be a developed concept in the movies isn't the same as being repeitiive or showing the origin wholesale again.*shakes head*
It reminds me way back when people were actually wanting it to show his origin again in some way. Same thing with The Incredible Hulk before we saw that they showed us a bit of Banner's accident during the credits.
Some people just want the same thing over and over again or can't move on. It's not the end of the world if they don't fully refer to Uncle Ben.
Personally, as much as "With great power comes great responsibility" is tied to Spider-Man/Parker, I swear I'll throw up if I hear it again. We've heard it so many times that the general audience also damn well knows by now that is a Spider-Man thing. Same with Uncle Ben's death.
Yes. It's not repetitive to have the character have a developed idea.Amen. So no matter how many time Spiderman gets rebooted, you guys want Uncle Ben to die in all of them? That's repetitive.
I think that's not the case.It's good they are trying other things.
Maybe they should have made a body horror film.Wanting the character to be a developed concept in the movies isn't the same as being repeitiive or showing the origin wholesale again.Yes. It's not repetitive to have the character have a developed idea.I think that's not the case.
Have to be. I can't think of anything else.Gotta be a sinister six hint right? Really hope the Sony deal gets renewed soon.
