Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]518815[/split]
Good for the show. Though I've yet to see Discovery, it's nice to have another Star Trek show on television that, from what I hear, is at least received well by some.
Try The Orville. It is more Star Trek than Discovery is, which despite being in the continuity ignores the history of Star Trek more than Orville does.Good for the show. Though I've yet to see Discovery, it's nice to have another Star Trek show on television that, from what I hear, is at least received well by some.
Good for the show. Though I've yet to see Discovery, it's nice to have another Star Trek show on television that, from what I hear, is at least received well by some.
Try The Orville. It is more Star Trek than Discovery is, which despite being in the continuity ignores the history of Star Trek more than Orville does.
Agreed for the most part. It's gotten a couple good chuckles out of me, though.Try both...it's allowed. But go into The Orville knowing that it is attempting to be a dramedy. The "dra" part is okay at best but the "medy" isn't funny.
I'm glad they got a 2nd season but I hope they do some major retooling.
Try The Orville. It is more Star Trek than Discovery is, which despite being in the continuity ignores the history of Star Trek more than Orville does.
Yeah, the writing for the two part pilot was structurally rough and rushed, but that is often the case with Star Trek series in their early days so I was okay with that. Nevertheless, I felt like it was far better Trek than the Abrams films more in spirit with what Star Trek means to me personally, so I was willing to give it a chance. The quality is improving in some ways (the science is horrible and there is still very convenient plotting), but I'm feeling more like I was wrong about them understanding or capturing the Star Trek spirit. Also, the spore drive is just idiotic bad science. Real world Stamets' research is about biological applications of mushrooms. The idea of space travel by space mushroom network is ridiculous. The fact that there isn't uproar about this is just proof of how far science education has fallen in the US.
She feels like she's from a completely different show than the rest of the characters.
We fuel our vehicles with the liquefied remains of dinosaurs. So the starship using some sort of quantum biology to travel isn't that hard for me to accept. Besides this show is set 200+ years in the future. Think about the difference between 1817 and 2017. Its possible that they might know a thing or two that we dont.
That's what I've said before. It's like she's from some old Joss Whedon show.
And Stamets, too, depending on how the writers want him to behave in any particular behavior.
I swear, one of the biggest issues the show has is consistency, especially in regards to character and tone. They have got to make up their minds on who these characters are and their personalities (most of the characters appear schizophrenic so far), and they need to decide what kind of show they want to make. Action, drama, horror, comedy? Telling a serial story means they need to pick one, they don't have the luxury of an episodic structure where they could mix things up.