Superman Returns Superman Returns PROMOTING unprotected sex???

that's what kids do when dinosaurs acttack them. It's instincts.
 
TheBlueWolf said:
You never know...I mean, that is the point isn't it? Most kids are NOT rational adults...they are kids...that tend to act out their fantasies or fantasies they witness...ie Spy Kids, Spiderman, or SUPERMAN...so that is the point. You already have alot of kids now days that want to be vampires, from watching movies like Blade and what not...so you never no!

yes....but most KIDS (10 and under) hardly know anything ABOUT sex, let alone most little boys and girls aren't even able to reproduce.

most kids who watch the movie will be paying attention to the action and eyecandy...it's the messed up kids who tend to be influenced by things like knocking up a chick. and they could get that idea from ANY movie...

...all i'm sayin' is that it's ridiculous to think SR is actually PROMOTING unprotected sex. i can understand if you said kids MIGHT be INFLUENCED by Supes' bedroom habits, but to think WB, Singer, and Co. actually WANT kids to start knocking each other up ludicrous.
 
Yeah, BUT you see...when it is learned that Lois is a MOMMY as Jimmy exclaims! Maybe the kids will go like, how can she be a mommy when there is no DADDY. And then it is discovered that Daddy was Supes, and that he abandoned mommy Lois for x number of years. See, that could cause these kids to get messed up.

Let's just hope that the KID is some type of LUTHOR experiment or something, and just DIES...so we can move on with a real Superman story for the sequel! Maybe a piano will fall on the kid. haha
 
hunter rider said:
I just know that by the end of the summer i shall be having unprotected sex while decoding,working as a secret agent wearing a pirate hat and living in Miami:(

Hell, thats what I was thinking of doing :up: :p
 
Maybe Superman and Lois did use protection, but you know that stuff isn't sure proof!
 
"Faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a latex condom!"
 
TheBlueWolf said:
Yeah, BUT you see...when it is learned that Lois is a MOMMY as Jimmy exclaims! Maybe the kids will go like, how can she be a mommy when there is no DADDY. And then it is discovered that Daddy was Supes, and that he abandoned mommy Lois for x number of years. See, that could cause these kids to get messed up.

once again....most kids won't be paying attention to that. they'll be looking for the scenes where Supes is in action...not where Supes is crying cuz is baby momma dissed him.

you're only thinking like that because you're not a kid anymore...sex wouldn't even come to most kids' minds.
 
We've officially sunk to an all-time low around here..............
 
Mentok said:
Hell, thats what I was thinking of doing :up: :p

it's the only way to go:up:

Shouldn't we be more worried about kids wanting to try and fly ?:confused: *Climbs on chair*
 
Milkman95 said:
We've officially sunk to an all-time low around here..............

Its bound to happen every few weeks.
 
TheBlueWolf said:
If for some crazy reason, the KID turns out to be Superman’s…what does this promote??? That it is okay for teens to have unprotected sex, knock up their girl, and then LEAVE for x number of years…is that the message that would be conveyed???

Or maybe…it’s okay for girls to have unprotected sex and get knocked up, because LOIS did it! 

I think the whole KID thing is a terrible idea, and could cause some rather DIRE moral and ethical consequences, that may SHATTER the very fabric of CHILD and TEENAGE INNOCENCE!!!

Why, there would be teens and kids everywhere emulating SUPERMAN and having unprotected sex, to be just like their HERO!

Yes, I know...it is JUST a movie...BUT, books influence, music influences, MOVIES INFLUENCE! :-)
Superman Returns PROMOTING unprotected sex???
what a great idea you can come up with! :up:
 
TheBlueWolf said:
If for some crazy reason, the KID turns out to be Superman’s…what does this promote??? That it is okay for teens to have unprotected sex, knock up their girl, and then LEAVE for x number of years…is that the message that would be conveyed???

Or maybe…it’s okay for girls to have unprotected sex and get knocked up, because LOIS did it! 

I think the whole KID thing is a terrible idea, and could cause some rather DIRE moral and ethical consequences, that may SHATTER the very fabric of CHILD and TEENAGE INNOCENCE!!!

Why, there would be teens and kids everywhere emulating SUPERMAN and having unprotected sex, to be just like their HERO!

Yes, I know...it is JUST a movie...BUT, books influence, music influences, MOVIES INFLUENCE! :-)


No, if anything it says, if you have sex, you CAN get pregnent, so DON'T be irresponsible and think you can just run off.
 
TheBlueWolf said:
If for some crazy reason, the KID turns out to be Superman’s…what does this promote??? That it is okay for teens to have unprotected sex, knock up their girl, and then LEAVE for x number of years…is that the message that would be conveyed???

Or maybe…it’s okay for girls to have unprotected sex and get knocked up, because LOIS did it! 

I think the whole KID thing is a terrible idea, and could cause some rather DIRE moral and ethical consequences, that may SHATTER the very fabric of CHILD and TEENAGE INNOCENCE!!!

Why, there would be teens and kids everywhere emulating SUPERMAN and having unprotected sex, to be just like their HERO!

Yes, I know...it is JUST a movie...BUT, books influence, music influences, MOVIES INFLUENCE! :-)


Your stupid. I guess you are the kind of person that says Guns kill people. Also the type of person that says video games cause violence. A do gooder and a finger pointer. Educate yourself!
 
TheBlueWolf said:
If for some crazy reason, the KID turns out to be Superman’s…what does this promote??? That it is okay for teens to have unprotected sex, knock up their girl, and then LEAVE for x number of years…is that the message that would be conveyed???

Or maybe…it’s okay for girls to have unprotected sex and get knocked up, because LOIS did it! 

I think the whole KID thing is a terrible idea, and could cause some rather DIRE moral and ethical consequences, that may SHATTER the very fabric of CHILD and TEENAGE INNOCENCE!!!

Why, there would be teens and kids everywhere emulating SUPERMAN and having unprotected sex, to be just like their HERO!

Yes, I know...it is JUST a movie...BUT, books influence, music influences, MOVIES INFLUENCE! :-)

Superman's not a teenager! Oh.....and your a dumbass for posting this
 
How many movies have you seen that actually had two people about to "get down" practice safe sex techniques?
 
there was the 40 year old virgin.
 
TheBlueWolf said:
If for some crazy reason, the KID turns out to be Superman’s…what does this promote??? That it is okay for teens to have unprotected sex, knock up their girl, and then LEAVE for x number of years…is that the message that would be conveyed???

Or maybe…it’s okay for girls to have unprotected sex and get knocked up, because LOIS did it! 

I think the whole KID thing is a terrible idea, and could cause some rather DIRE moral and ethical consequences, that may SHATTER the very fabric of CHILD and TEENAGE INNOCENCE!!!

Why, there would be teens and kids everywhere emulating SUPERMAN and having unprotected sex, to be just like their HERO!

Yes, I know...it is JUST a movie...BUT, books influence, music influences, MOVIES INFLUENCE! :-)

I can't wait to see what the red state evangelical types think of Singer's vision.

Hoooo-boy
 
gdw said:
No, if anything it says, if you have sex, you CAN get pregnent, so DON'T be irresponsible and think you can just run off.

So Superman becomes Johnny-don't-do?:)
 
Oldguy said:
I can't wait to see what the red state evangelical types think of Singer's vision.

Hoooo-boy


I have to agree with ya here. People here are still saying it wont be any issue. Well the fact that someone brought it up shows that it will. If some fan is going to recognize the posibility then just wait till the hard right conservative types get a look at this situation.

It will be an issue guys. I hate to say it...but it will. The fact that we keep discussing it. The fact that it was brought up at comicon, and several interviews if not all of them with Singer. The fact that even after everything is said and done and the film is released it's going to be a question. Is it promoting anything? Nah I dont see it that way. But condoning it could be argued.
 
newmexneon said:
How many movies have you seen that actually had two people about to "get down" practice safe sex techniques?

"I just love you so much... Hang on a sec, I gotta go get a condom."
 
I believe all of this has been brought up in the other "What's up with the KID?" threads......but continue on ...as long as you keep it clean.
 
Saying that this promotes unprotected sex i like saying that Silence of the Lambs promotes serial murder and that Requiem for a Dream promotes drug use.
 
Il_Siciliano said:
Saying that this promotes unprotected sex i like saying that Silence of the Lambs promotes serial murder and that Requiem for a Dream promotes drug use.

I completely agree with you, but do you think that the 53% of Americans who voted Bush for his "family values" will?
 
Oldguy said:
I completely agree with you, but do you think that the 53% of Americans who voted Bush for his "family values" will?
It's actually a hard call. I'm not sure how vocal they will be about the subject....simply because, they sometimes raise a stink about a subject...or they ignore it.

Plus....everyone who voted for him wasn't just voting for "his family values" stand....there were other issues involved.

So.....I'm not sure how people will react at this time.
 
Superman 2 promoted the use of rohyphenol. I see that as a much larger issue.


:rolleyes:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"