Blade Hoarder
Sidekick
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2018
- Messages
- 2,543
- Reaction score
- 3,267
- Points
- 103
This movie would’ve bombed even harder with if they “celebrated” Snyder.
That is very true, sadly.Jurassic Park is 30 years old and still looks better than 90% of blockbusters today.
As per reports, the entire film was on the platform for 8 hours before it was taken down. The account that was suspected to be responsible for the leak also got suspended. Reports suggest that the tweet with the movie amassed around 1.7 million views before it was taken down. Further, according to the reports, the user who leaked the movie decided to do so on Sunday so that the concerned authorities could take their sweet time to take action.
Jurassic Park is 30 years old and still looks better than 90% of blockbusters today.
And even that was basically in a few scenes. The dinosaurs were mostly practical.That’s because back then they CGI the T-Rex.
Avatar is the exception to the rule. Not every blockbuster has the luxury to take more than a decade of time to be made. Because that's how you make such a CGI heavy movie not look like cheap crap.There’s nothing wrong with 90% of the scene being CGI, if it’s actually good. See: Avatar.
Question, if there's anyone here who has both seen The Flash and read DC's six-issue Batman '89 mini-series from a couple of years back...
Is there anything in The Flash that goes against those comics being considered canon? They were written by Sam Hamm, who had a hand in the writing of both Batman '89 and Batman Returns, and were intended to be a continuation of the Burtonverse. Like The Flash, they don't acknowledge Batman Forever or Batman & Robin. So would they work as occurring between Batman Returns and The Flash?
Again, Keaton was written as a "generic old Bruce" probably because the role was intended for any old Batman actor they could get, so there are basically zero specifics about his life after his movies included.Question, if there's anyone here who has both seen The Flash and read DC's six-issue Batman '89 mini-series from a couple of years back...
Is there anything in The Flash that goes against those comics being considered canon? They were written by Sam Hamm, who had a hand in the writing of both Batman '89 and Batman Returns, and were intended to be a continuation of the Burtonverse. Like The Flash, they don't acknowledge Batman Forever or Batman & Robin. So would they work as occurring between Batman Returns and The Flash?
Let's fill in the Easter eggs later.Again, Keaton was written as a "generic old Bruce" probably because the role was intended for any old Batman actor they could get, so there are basically zero specifics about his life after his movies included.
I gave up on buying those comics after the second one since I my humble opinion was that they were trash. I kept looking at them cause a friend of mine had a digital subscription.
I dont think those comics had anything that really contradicts stuff since The Flash movie hardly deals with Keatons past. They don't mention stuff in detail really, besides the reason why he is kind of retired.
Thanks both. Yes, I've read the comics and I wasn't impressed. According to Jim Lee several creators had proposed comics set in the Burtonverse over the years. Hard to believe this was the one DC finally went with. A great opportunity squandered.Again, Keaton was written as a "generic old Bruce" probably because the role was intended for any old Batman actor they could get, so there are basically zero specifics about his life after his movies included.
I actually enjoyed large chunks of the movie, the main story bones are solid but there was a lot of filler (and Miller mugging as the unbearable younger Barry) to sit through. Miller had GREAT chemistry with Maribel Verdu as Barry's mom and that made the movie.
Visuals looked fine. VFX wasn't going to win any awards but it looked ok. I was expecting BAD going into the movie but it was adequate. Keaton and Calle did well for what they got.
Benjamin Wallfisch's score was FANTASTIC. He did musically what Michael Giacchino should've done for NWH, score-wise.
Thanks both. Yes, I've read the comics and I wasn't impressed. According to Jim Lee several creators had proposed comics set in the Burtonverse over the years. Hard to believe this was the one DC finally went with. A great opportunity squandered.
The comic was definitely missing the Burton vibe. Gotham didn't even look like B89 Gotham (apart from one distance shot, as I recall).I guess it just shows how vital Burton was in the creation of both movies.