The Amazing Spider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man General Discussion & Speculation Thread - - - - Part 14

Status
Not open for further replies.
But I have seen these people get mad when someone gives a different opinion. For instance...

The cinema studies major said he liked the Hurt Locker more than Avatar. Another friend replies that he likes Avatar a lot more. The guy who studies film said that the other is wrong simply because he is a cinema studies major.

Sounds like my brother :woot:

He's not that jerky though haha...he is a film student but he just prefers certain elements over others...he generally dislikes superhero films but really enjoyed TDK. We dragged him to TF3 when it came out just to torture him. 'twas beautiful.

It's all a matter of preference.
 
Paraphrase my post, will ya?

*shakes fist*

lol my bad man, I saw it after I posted mine but hey, we agree. Forms of entertainment are based on subjectivity. Unless there's some mathematical equation to base a good movie on, we will all have different opinions. I'd argue someone to death about the Godfather being the greatest flick ever but I'm not going to have a heart attack if they just don't like it. It's too long for some people, a lot of dialogue and the gangster stuff that happens is few and far in between so I can understand their issues with it. When I was 18, Spider-Man 2 was the greatest comic book flick to me hands down...4 years later, I saw the dark knight and changed my tune. Doesn't make spider-man 2 not great just means my opinion changed with growth and what I liked in a movie vs what I didn't like. But if anyone told me they disliked either one of those movies I wouldn't hold it against them
 
No. You didn't explain the novelty of Spider-Man. You just pointed out the novelty of all superheroes.

Superheros are awesome not just because of the "hero" part. But also because as kids (and even adults), we fantasize having their powers. Thats not just for Spider-Man.

You dont get it,How is Spider-man different from other superheros?

He is not a billionaire,he is not an alien,he is not a scientist,he is not a mutant,or a lab rat.

He is an ordinary high schooler(Maybe a genius) but still just a teenager.The web shooters are a small part of the extraordinary superpowers he gains accidently
 
On Twitter from a guy at Latino Review:

elmayimbe ‏@elmayimbe
Lower your expectations for AMAZING SPIDER MAN.


Couldn't be more cryptic, a guy tells him before that that the movie looks low-rent, to which Elmayimbe says "it does unfortunately".

WTF is going on?! Seeing what we've seen, there is like zero chance that the movie is bad, I don't understand these silly rumors of the movie being bad and etc, but it's starting to spread.

Has seen the movie as the test audience?
 
On Twitter from a guy at Latino Review:

elmayimbe ‏@elmayimbe
Lower your expectations for AMAZING SPIDER MAN.


Couldn't be more cryptic, a guy tells him before that that the movie looks low-rent, to which Elmayimbe says "it does unfortunately".

WTF is going on?! Seeing what we've seen, there is like zero chance that the movie is bad, I don't understand these silly rumors of the movie being bad and etc, but it's starting to spread.

This really bums me out. I can't wait for more people (like you Tim_Riggins) to see the movie and start posting sincere reactions. But even though I want to disregard negative things like the Latino Review guy's tweets, I can't help but get affected by it. If it's a mind-blowingly awesome movie like it looks in the footage I've seen so far, then the buzz around it should be "Saw it, it's F'n glorious." not "lower your expectations". I'm getting a little worried. I hope the buzz tide turns soon with more leaks, hopefully positive reactions.
 
This really bums me out. I can't wait for more people (like you Tim_Riggins) to see the movie and start posting sincere reactions. But even though I want to disregard negative things like the Latino Review guy's tweets, I can't help but get affected by it. If it's a mind-blowingly awesome movie like it looks in the footage I've seen so far, then the buzz around it should be "Saw it, it's F'n glorious." not "lower your expectations". I'm getting a little worried. I hope the buzz tide turns soon with more leaks, hopefully positive reactions.

Do you mean to say they have indeed seen a leaked version?

If they havent,I dont give a f**k about their opinion from the trailers

If they have,well it is a reason to worry about
 
Do you mean to say they have indeed seen a leaked version?

If they havent,I dont give a f**k about their opinion from the trailers

If they have,well it is a reason to worry about

I'm interpreting from the guy's tweet that he has seen the movie in a test screening or something, and was underwhelmed. If this is the case, he's bound by a NDA and isn't supposed to say anything. Hopefully not the case and he hasn't seen the movie, but that's what my take on it is.
 
A few people on the internet have come out saying that they've seen different cuts of the film because they're a "sony insideer" and that the film is "goddamn awful". However, doing that is just as easy as someone saying they're a sony exec and that the film is an 8/10. But of course, the negative news will always gain more attention, and perhaps have more truth to it. Any case, just really keep expectations low because in the end, it may just help you.
 
I'm interpreting from the guy's tweet that he has seen the movie in a test screening or something, and was underwhelmed. If this is the case, he's bound by a NDA and isn't supposed to say anything. Hopefully not the case and he hasn't seen the movie, but that's what my take on it is.

I don't know how the industry works, but I wonder how anyone can get to see a test screening unless they were an exec. Even if he is connected in the industry, online journalists won't get to see the film until a few more weeks which should be a better indicator how well good or bad the film is.

Also, can anyone explain why ASM is already rated on critic's choice awards?

 
A few people on the internet have come out saying that they've seen different cuts of the film because they're a "sony insideer" and that the film is "goddamn awful". However, doing that is just as easy as someone saying they're a sony exec and that the film is an 8/10. But of course, the negative news will always gain more attention, and perhaps have more truth to it. Any case, just really keep expectations low because in the end, it may just help you.

It would be tragic for so many reasons if the movie ends up being bad, one of the biggest being how much playing Spider-Man means to Andrew Garfield, and how badly he wants to do a good job of it, not to mention how amped us Spidey fans are for a good Spider-Man film.
 
Despite Spider-Man 3 being a huge disappointment, I know several people who like it, or even love it more than the first two movies. Does it mean they have "bad taste?" No, of course not. I respect their opinion. I have a library of films that most people despise, but that isn't going to stop me from enjoying the movies!

:up:
 
What about Kevin Fiege's opinion of the film? He said it was excellent...
 
Is anyone surprised at how badly Snow White and the Huntsman is being received by critics? I'm wasn't really looking forward to it but I always thought it would end up getting decent reviews and at least be fresh on rotten tomatoes. God, the anticipation of whether ASM will be good or bad is killing me.
 
You dont get it,How is Spider-man different from other superheros?

He is not a billionaire,he is not an alien,he is not a scientist,he is not a mutant,or a lab rat.

He is an ordinary high schooler(Maybe a genius) but still just a teenager.The web shooters are a small part of the extraordinary superpowers he gains accidently

On the contrary, I got exactly what you were saying. I'm not dumb.

Did you read what I said properly? You were talking about how as a kid you thought of becoming Spidey yourself. What I said was that that part is not just exclusive to Spidey. Thats the essence of ALL superheroes! His relatability however, is a different matter. Thats what has made him stand out more among the other superheros.

And the stuff about him being ordinary is beyond obvious by now. I myself said that before and its been said for decades. EVERYONE knows Spidey is popular because he is a superhero with regular problems. The accident is a very very small part of what makes Spidey, well... Spidey. Its just a plot device for Peter to get his powers. That is all.

Him getting bitten on accident or not doesnt change much. Ask anyone why they like Spidey. Its not because "oh, that spider could have bit me too". I've NEVER gotten that response. You could say the same for any other superhero that got his powers by accident (and there are a good amount of them). The way they got their powers hardly matters in the end of the day. What matters is the character and the powers and the villains.
 
Last edited:
I really can't see what possibly could be bad about this movie. I don't this being any worse than SM3.
 
What about Kevin Fiege's opinion of the film? He said it was excellent...

You know, I've been thinking about what type of demographics films are test screened for and so I looked Transformers 3. Turns out it was the best received Bay film. ever.
 
Is anyone surprised at how badly Snow White and the Huntsman is being received by critics? I'm wasn't really looking forward to it but I always thought it would end up getting decent reviews and at least be fresh on rotten tomatoes. God, the anticipation of whether ASM will be good or bad is killing me.
I didn't expect Snow White and the Huntsman to get great reviews honestly.

Spider-Man 3 still managed to get a 62% on rotten tomatoes.

Men in Black III was considered unnecessary but it currently holds a 69%, which is pretty good considering the circumstances and the quality of the movie.

I don't think ASM will get an astounding 95% RT rating, but I picture somewhere around 85%. Hopefully no lower than 80...
 
What about Kevin Fiege's opinion of the film? He said it was excellent...

That fact is definitely a reason to be optimistic, but for me cautiously so as I feel he has a vested interest (in whatever way). But definitely good that he spoke very positively. I am really waiting for critics and especially Spider-Man fans to chime in, as I'm sure everyone else is.
 
I really can't see what possibly could be bad about this movie. I don't this being any worse than SM3.

Me neither, it looks top notch in every way I can tell. They'd really have to drop the ball badly to botch this.
 
That fact is definitely a reason to be optimistic, but for me cautiously so as I feel he has a vested interest (in whatever way). But definitely good that he spoke very positively. I am really waiting for critics and especially Spider-Man fans to chime in, as I'm sure everyone else is.
The thing is that he did not work on the film at all, so I would have thought he would give it a poor review, hoping that Marvel would get the film rights back. But he liked it, and has high hopes for ALL comic films, even non-Marvel ones.
 
ASM's first reactions (def. not reviews, but rather simple expressions if Sony will be kind enough) will hit off during next week and the one after. They're already setting up dozens of screenings worldwide (I've seen the lists and dates, just need to see how and when I'll manage to do something useful).
 
I didn't expect Snow White and the Huntsman to get great reviews honestly.

Spider-Man 3 still managed to get a 62% on rotten tomatoes.

Men in Black III was considered unnecessary but it currently holds a 69%, which is pretty good considering the circumstances and the quality of the movie.

I don't think ASM will get an astounding 95% RT rating, but I picture somewhere around 85%. Hopefully no lower than 80...

Judging on a superficial level based on the footage and the talent involved, I can't see this film getting anything lower than SM1 which was 89% on RT. However, as the release date comes closer, the possibility of it doing well critically seems unlikely. Because I'm pessimistic.
 
Also, can anyone explain why ASM is already rated on critic's choice awards?

Because that rating is for the Amazing Spider-Man movie that came out in the 70s.

Go to the "Opening Soon" page and it says near the bottom:

The Amazing Spider-Man Voting in Progress
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,291
Messages
22,081,146
Members
45,881
Latest member
lucindaschatz
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"