The Avengers The Avengers Critics Reviews Thread - Part 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
That review from fanthefire is so hillariously obvious. Just the name alone tells you the type of contrarian reviewer he is. I just chuckle.
 
Go to hitfix.com and read the review by Neill Cumpston. I can't post a link because it has cursing in it but it's hilarious.
 
Go to hitfix.com and read the review by Neill Cumpston. I can't post a link because it has cursing in it but it's hilarious.

lmao..whatever that guy is on, i want lots of it
 
The FantheFire reviewer liked Green Lantern. Nuff said.
.....:csad:.....I liked Green Lantern....but I like alot of movies most people don't. :D

I really don't like too many Critics. I still say if you want to see a movie go see it don't decide based on a "critic's" viewing.
Personally I go by what most FANS say about the film over any critic, and even THEN it doesn't sway me from going to a film
 
This pull-quote from the badassdigest.com review is for BigThor, since not all that many reviews so far have singled out Thor for this kind of thing:

But while Thor lacks an arc, he has the film's funniest line, best entrance and seems to be a big part of all the film's best fights. He's a badass here in ways Kenneth Branagh never dreamed of.


As for the fantheflames (*snerk*) review: I don't object to people not liking the movie, obviously. There are just going to be folks for whom it doesn't work.

But the guy deserves heaps of scorn for the baiting quality of that review. Good lord, the whole "fanboys will only SAY they like it" thing? It doesn't get much more childish than that. I have a particular problem with people whose arguments consist of "I didn't like it and nobody else is allowed to have liked it either".

But apparently the reviewers for Variety and The Hollywood Reporter are fanboys who are just saying they liked it in order to maintain their fanboy cred! Who knew?
 
Another fresh added... we need a 5th "top critic" already, I want that certified fresh stamp :argh:
 
Guys, come on. He's allowed not to like it. Look, Green Lantern is not a good movie in the slightest, but I enjoy watching it. There's just some moments in that film that just click for me...and that's just the nature of film criticism.

Some things work for a particular person. That same thing might not work for another. Who's right?

Green Lantern is like a Tootsie Pop with a green apple coating. There's good stuff if you dig deep down enough, but you can't bring your self to get through the rotten outer shell.

I had the same reaction to it, as I did to Wrath of the Titans. There's a really good movie somewhere in Wrath of the Titans, mired in sloppy execution and horrible editing. They had a beginning and an ending, and decided to screw the middle part, just get to the interesting bits.

Opinion is one thing, but a critic has to admire film-making first and foremost. Green Lantern is a horrible film, from a film maker point of view. It's poor, it's sloppy, the director was asleep at the wheel, the producers didn't care, the actors clearly didn't care, and your left with a CGI nightmare that makes the Phantom Menace look brilliant by comparison.

I hate the movie, No Country for Old Men, but I admire the film making, even if I hate the story.
 
But the guy deserves heaps of scorn for the baiting quality of that review. Good lord, the whole "fanboys will only SAY they like it" thing? It doesn't get much more childish than that. I have a particular problem with people whose arguments consist of "I didn't like it and nobody else is allowed to have liked it either".

But apparently the reviewers for Variety and The Hollywood Reporter are fanboys who are just saying they liked it in order to maintain their fanboy cred! Who knew?
The thing about that guy is that he wants the scorn. He's hit ****ing for his site.

And I hate saying that usually, I cringed when people accused that first rotten writer of it, but his pull quote for RottenTomatoes is enormously telling

"Sorry fanboys, we hated this one too." = "Come at me, bro."
 
According to my calculations I don't expect this movie to see north of 95% again.
 
I didn't realize how many people didn't like Thor.

Ebert hated it, fanthefire hated it...hell, just the other day the singer in my band told me her boyfriend thought it was the worst thing he'd ever seen.

=S colour me confused.
 
The thing about that guy is that he wants the scorn. He's hit ****ing for his site.

And I hate saying that usually, I cringed when people accused that first rotten writer of it, but his pull quote for RottenTomatoes is enormously telling

"Sorry fanboys, we hated this one too." = "Come at me, bro."

Like I said, he outright admitted as much in the comments for his Thor review back when.
 
Liking Green Lantern is one thing, but he also had a rather positive review and score for Iron Man 2, the butt monkey of Marvel Studio's films. So his scathing review for The Avengers is baffling, to say the least.
 
I can accept the fact that movies in general can have a couple or several bad reviews, people have different tastes in movies and that's understandable. But ****ting on a movie just because you want attention is just plain stupid.
 
Go to hitfix.com and read the review by Neill Cumpston. I can't post a link because it has cursing in it but it's hilarious.

I. Loved. That. Review. Neill Cumpston's amazing.
 
Just thought I'd clear something up: Green Lantern was awesome.

But yeah, that guy was kind of *****ey.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,291
Messages
22,081,144
Members
45,881
Latest member
lucindaschatz
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"