Gamma Goliath
Engine of Destruction
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 14,604
- Reaction score
- 3,019
- Points
- 103
Why wouldn't this make enough money?
I am slightly worried it might not make enough money, though. I mean, if the 260 mil mark is true.....it has a bigger budget than Avatar.
It'll make AT LEAST as much as Iron Man 2, add Captain America, Thor, Hulk, Disney, 3D, Joss Whedon, the mega event feel and how good the movie is and that's almost a guaranteed success.I am slightly worried it might not make enough money, though. I mean, if the 260 mil mark is true.....it has a bigger budget than Avatar.
Yeah I was watching Oceans 11 too on HBO and was thinking the same thing![]()
Why wouldn't this make enough money?
I'm not worried it won't make enough to pass it's budget. I'm just a bit worried it won't be big enough to live up to our expectations of what it will make. This film has almost twice the budget of any other Marvel Studios film, and, unless I'm mistaken, the highest budget for any superhero film ever made.
It just seems too big is all. I mean, Marvel's been really careful with their films so far, with Iron Man 2 being the highest at about...what, 200 something mil?
I trust the film will be good, but I'm not sure how the general audience will think about it. Iron Man will be the main selling point, for sure, but will people avoid it if they didn't like the other films, or haven't seen them? There's just a lot riding on it.
I really don't see how this could not do great. People love Iron Man, they love Thor, and I'm guessing they love Captain America for I haven't heard anything negative about it... I really liked it myself.
Man, I gotta say you have been analyzing the bejesus out of this film. LOL
Didn't Spider-Man 3 cost over $300 mil?
No way .... Avatar definitely cost more than $260 million. The budget was so large on that thing that to this day they still openly refuse to discuss the exact number. All they execs at Fox will simply tell you that in hindsight it was money well spent.
i think 260m is fair and with the giant build up all the Marvel Studios movies have built it i cant see it not making it back and more.
add in Whedonites, 3D and other intangibles and im sure it will do well...it having great early buzz and being a GOOD movie will also push it.
The thing is, it entirely makes sense for its budget to be that huge. The films leading up to it have had "reasonable" budgets, and they've done "reasonably" good business. But the thing that Marvel can't afford is for The Avengers to come out, and be criticized along the lines of, "it could have been great but Marvel was too cheap to give it a budget to match its ambition".
Sure, a budget that big (and that's before anything is added for promotion) is a gamble. But not making the gamble, and winding up making a film that seems "too small" for what it's supposed to be, would be a mistake.
I'm just glad that -- if the report is accurate -- it sounds like they know that The Avengers is no time to skimp on anything.
Yes. Cap is the distraction. In a broader sense, he would be the STRATEGY against the Hulk. Aiming his fellow Avengers where they need to be. Altho, I think Cap would be able to get in a few good pressure point hits, and POSSIBLY, be able to knock Hulk off his feet.
I forget who the saying came from, but :
"Among folks like these, at any given time, Cap is ALMOST NEVER the most powerful guy in the room, however, it's safe money on him being the most dangerous."
It'll make AT LEAST as much as Iron Man 2, add Captain America, Thor, Hulk, Disney, 3D, Joss Whedon, the mega event feel and how good the movie is and that's almost a guaranteed success.
I dont think Joss Whedon is a big enough draw to the General Audience...they might not know who he is
Nothing too interesting, but do you guys remember when I said a guy from Facebook said he'd be playing a [BLACKOUT]mercenary that Captain America takes down at an airport[/BLACKOUT]? Well, he just updated his FB status.
So if Cap is taking down a SHIELD Mercenary, what could that mean?