Stretch what? a couple of your examples claim she took Sharon's personality. The others are more about Yelena. You think Yelena (a BW character) fans are somehow all Sharon fans? Some of those twitter feeds hardly mention Sharon aside from those tweets.
I was responding to your:
They what now?
No one ever said she took Sharon's personality. Just her role. Sharon isn't supposed to be smug and so on. Suppose it was the same person you claim wanted Cap to die.
Only complaints I've seen is that she's going to be undercover as Yelena Belova, meaning they're not going to be able to use her if a BW movie gets made.
If you seriously want to claim that pearls like
'nat is stealing all the blondes identities',
'who the **** is this? sharon carter? yelena belova? they rlly do NOT know how to write nat and scarjo's awful acting ugh',
'natasha romanoff becoming sharon carter',
'...since natasha is her now' or
'they gave everything of sharon's to natasha' are not implying that Natasha took Sharon's personality, then there is no point to continue this discussion really.
And here you are, badmouthing Sharon fans, asking why aren't they complaining about Wanda.
I only badmouth those who are crazy like these people, who are claiming Natasha stole Sharon's id, because she's blonde now. They are acting like Sharon and Belova have some kind of a monopoly on being blonde. They haven't even seen the movie. I've never said that all Sharon's fans are like them.
If they are complaining about BW stealing Sharon's role, then yes, they should at least follow their own logic and complain about Wanda doing the same as well. But no, of course not, because of double standards they use all the time. Wanda doesn't have a close relationship with Steve, so they don't hate her as BW for it.
You know twitter has a 140 character limit right?
How is it relevant to my point? You could say "I don't like BW's development", but these mocking ridiculous claims are definitely hatred, because they just make no sense. Like it or not, it's idiotic and offensive to say BW's only development is her hair. Or that she is stealing someone's id. She is literally the most developed female character in the MCU (of course I'm not talking about TV-shows for the obvious reasons).
Heck, they even admit they hate the Russos for their BW's portrayal.
Dude, the Russos gave Natasha a big role in TWS and built her up as Steve's close friend. If Cap4 were to happen, she'd be there once again.
So why would it be different the other way around? If a BW movie were to be conceived, people would ask 'Where is Steve?' 'Why wouldn't she ask for his help?'.
It would be the filmmakers' task to explain why Steve isn't in her solo-movie, not mine. What's so hard about it? They explained well why she wasn't team Cap in CW. They explained, why she went on the run on her own in the end of TWS.
It's not so mandatory as you are trying it to make.
Besides, Evans is open to continue. I doubt he would be against a cameo or small supporting role in BW's movie. Make them be separated for some reason - it's not that hard. Maybe Natasha wants to explore her past and doesn't want to entangle Steve in it. Various reasons.