- Joined
- Sep 14, 2008
- Messages
- 40,446
- Reaction score
- 6,223
- Points
- 103
Bond should be able to charm you up with drinks and conversation and then snap your neck when he gains your trust.
Bond wasn't supposed to look like he could kick some ass, thug like. He was supposed to look like a sophisticated high class gentleman.

Exactly. In way, Goldfinger starting the Bond formula is why I like FRWL and Goldeneye more. FRWL just felt more unique and its the most spy thriller-like of all the Bond films. Goldeneye proved that Bond is more than a Cold-War era character.


I agree with you Jones about the gadgets. I'm not a big Bond gadget fan, they always seemed kind of dumb to me.
Who is that in your avvy?
I think the Bond of (at least the early) novels is slim and wiry because he is a product of Britain's post-war rationing years. It was a time of hardship here; if you look at pictures of British soldiers during the war, they tend to be underweight, as do civilians. The concept picture of 007 produced for Ian Fleming shows a lean, cold-looking man, who nevertheless looks quite deadly.
![]()
Really, he just has an old fashioned kind of look. It doesn't conform to the modern view of an action hero. Nevertheless, I think Christian Bale or Michael Fassbender could play faithful interpretations of the 1950s 007 of the novels.
I think the Bond of (at least the early) novels is slim and wiry because he is a product of Britain's post-war rationing years. It was a time of hardship here; if you look at pictures of British soldiers during the war, they tend to be underweight, as do civilians. The concept picture of 007 produced for Ian Fleming shows a lean, cold-looking man, who nevertheless looks quite deadly.
![]()
Really, he just has an old fashioned kind of look. It doesn't conform to the modern view of an action hero. Nevertheless, I think Christian Bale or Michael Fassbender could play faithful interpretations of the 1950s 007 of the novels.
I remember an old interview with Bale in an issue of Empire, made right when he was at a career crossroads and people thought it was a forgone conclusion that he was either going to be the next Bond or the next Batman.
We all know what happened next but in an alternate reality somewhere there is currently a Christian Bale 007.

I too prefer the spy thriller route than the video game strict action film route. I also prefer Bond with less to no gadgets, relying more on his wits, as he did in CR, FRWL, Dr. No, Goldeneye (I don't remember what gadgets he used in this?)
Yeah, so I prefer the dirtier and more ruthless Bond. The Bond/Grant fight in FRWL is so damn awesome because how down and dirty it is.

Cool. Maybe I'm playing Felix in that reality as well.![]()

Cool! Nice to see that I'm not the only one who thinks FRWL is the best Bond film ever.![]()
For some strange reason, i just don't see Bale as Bond.
Cool. Maybe I'm playing Felix in that reality as well.![]()
So you were in the running for it then? Much talked about in the mags and papers were you?

Cool! Nice to see that I'm not the only one who thinks FRWL is the best Bond film ever.![]()
I think the Bond of (at least the early) novels is slim and wiry because he is a product of Britain's post-war rationing years. It was a time of hardship here; if you look at pictures of British soldiers during the war, they tend to be underweight, as do civilians. The concept picture of 007 produced for Ian Fleming shows a lean, cold-looking man, who nevertheless looks quite deadly.
![]()
Really, he just has an old fashioned kind of look. It doesn't conform to the modern view of an action hero. Nevertheless, I think Christian Bale or Michael Fassbender could play faithful interpretations of the 1950s 007 of the novels.