bell110
Drunk on Capitol Hill
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2007
- Messages
- 3,096
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
I was gonna be sarcastic since that's how you chose to respond instead of trying to come up with a legitimate answer to my question (which I suppose is the way one responds when one doesn't have a legit answer but feel they must lash back in SOME way), but instead I'll just say under obama Iraq still doesn't have wmd's (unless they found their way out the back door into Syria during the month it took our troops to make their way into Bagdad - no, that makes too much sense), we're still wasting money, resources and lives, and iraq is not a threat. IOW the circumstances are still the same. Obama campaigned on the promise of immediate troop withdrawal. Clearly that didn't happen. So I'll give you another chance: where is the outrage? Where are the picketers? Why are soldiers lives so much less precious now that bush is out of office? Exactly.
And just out of curiosity, what were you saying to yourself when hussein was blocking every effort of the UN to search for evidence of the production of wmds? When bush extended deadline after deadline for invasion trying to get cooperation from sadaam but to no avail? Did you think this was the behavior of someone with nothing to hide?
I wasn't being sarcastic, what I said is absolutly true.
As for your question, right now people are more concerned with the economy and jobs. And the Tea Partiers are the picketers du jour. I agree though, it is sad we are still in Iraq. Getting that albetross off our neck would free up some money for the Health Care bill.
As for Hussein's feet dragging, I was like "meh". Like I said, he wasn't a threat. And if I recall, the UN finally did get to search Iraq and found nothing. Hussein himself said he had nothing. But Bush was like, "We have evidence.... we just can't show you". It's sad that nobody saw that Bush was manipulating our fear and anger after 9/11 so he could invade Iraq.