It's not like Kal-el/Superman was a cipher. I disagree with "very little dialogue." There was enough. Not all films require a jabberjaws Tony Stark. Watch Drive. Ryan Gosling barely says anything throughout the whole movie and it works just fine.
That really doesnt sound like good enough reasons to 'hate' the final 30 minutes. Yes it was too long and too action heavy, but Im surprised by the amount of people who 'hated' it to the point they say it ruined the entire film for them.
Also where did you get the script? I've been looking for it since the movie came out.
Never heard of this guy before, but since he tagged BvS I'm posting this here.
![]()
In the comments, people are speculating he is Shazam.
Kyle was my first thought. Not that I think he's got the role, but that that's the role he's thinking of & fits in the looks departmenthttp://www.cosmicbooknews.com/content/ricardo-segarra-teases-green-lantern-dccu
CosmicBookNews is reporting that he is hinting at Green Lantern (maybe Kyle Rayner). He tweeted the GL oath in one of his posts.
So, you disliked the film, yet you read the script and the novelization.
You know, if people were really that annoyed that the action scenes were too long, then they could have just as easily got up to go get popcorn or something. Come to think of it, I don't know of anyone who actually did that (and I saw it twice in theatres).
The final battle in Avengers: Age of Ultron seemed to go on a while. Nobody complained, or so it seems. Or maybe it's because everyone noticed how closely the film's structure mimics the first Avengers. In that case...no wonder!
Absolutely, and I watched it 5x in theatres and another 10x at home. I'm a superman geek and I was sad about not liking this film overall because it had TONS of potential and I liked alot of it.
The casting was perfect, Cavill+the suit=superman, the whole krypton bit was excellent (although a blatant rip off of 'brave new world' but it still worked), some characters like the kents and jor-el were well written while General Zod was the most interesting comicbook movie villain since loki not to mention that the film did away with whole silly superman-lois-clark love triangle!
But in the end the character of superman/clark was underdeveloped and to me that makes or breaks a superman movie.
Like I said though the film had potential and I hope that potential is realized in BvS somewhat, that's why I'm gonna give the DCEU another chanc
p.s. you guys should read the novelization (if you can't get your hands on the shooting script) because in many ways it was better than the final product IMO.
It's not like Kal-el/Superman was a cipher. I disagree with "very little dialogue." There was enough. Not all films require a jabberjaws Tony Stark. Watch Drive. Ryan Gosling barely says anything throughout the whole movie and it works just fine.
Actually, a lot of people complained about that, I being one of them. It was less about the length, though, and more about it being monotonous, there wasn't any sense of danger and Ultron came off as an ineffectual villain.
With MoS, I feel when most people complain about the length of the last fight, they're actually referring to the lack of variety. I would like to have seen a moment in the middle of the fight where Superman is desperately trying to save people, but is prevented from doing so by Zod. I feel something like that would've broken up the scene a little bit and maybe prevented years of fanboys claiming Superman destroyed Metropolis.
Yeah, that would have been good. But some of the hyperbole by fans about the fight was ridiculous. I mean it was what? Five minutes long? Yet I've literally heard people say it was 45 minutes. I mean, seriously, even if you thought the fight was boring, do you have no concept of time?
The problem with the Zod fight is that by the time they were ready to throw down, audience members like myself were already exhausted from the prior fights. Nothing new was happening other than this time they were destroying buildings everywhere. Supes had him up in space and inexplicably allowed the fight back down into Metropolis. At that point I was just like can this movie end already.
Hey, I don't like liver. The thing is I'm not foolish enough to keep trying it. That's why your claim lacks any credibility.
Zod threw a satellite at him. Supes caught it and Zod used the distraction to bring the fight back to Metropolis. Supes didn't inexplicably allow anything.
I really hope people who watch BvS pay attention this time around.
Superman was never even in my top 10 favorite heroes. Now he's interchangeable with Batman as 1st and second favorite heroes of all time!
What changed you ask? MAN OF STEEL. After watching the first 20 min on Krypton, it resonated with me emotionally. The rest of the movie wasnt perfect, but i loved it anyways. I LOVE this movie.
I respect the opinion of those who didn't like the movie, but coming from a long time Batman/Hulk/Xmen fan, this movie made me love Superman above almost all of them.
After MOS, I devoured every Superman comic I could get my hands on. All thanks to MOS. It is my sincerest hope that once the DC movie universe is up and running and a few good movies in, that people will look back more fondly on MOS. Seriously, love that movie!
![]()
offical?
Superman couldn't re-route? Zod was right there with him as it was cascading down back into the atmosphere.
Doesn't change anything about what I said though. The fight was exhausting and at that point excessive. It was 5-6 verrrrry long minutes because of fight fatigue.
Zod was pummeling him. Once Supes got the upper hand, he took Zod into the middle of a train station without killing in civilians and what followed was the neck snap heard 'round the world.
I don't care if you didn't like it, but it hurts whatever point you're making when you revise history.