The Dark Knight The Composite Christopher Nolan Interview Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wish someone would ask nolan about the fight scenes, if he has taken a different approach to how the fight scenes where shot and how theyll be edited. that has me worried.
 
nice interview - thanks.

I am certainly for a Nolan directed trilogy....
And glad to hear the Harlequin rumor is just that.
As for the last voice in TDK, my vote goes for Harvey/Two Face.
 
Oh dear God.

Nolan describes the Joker in his film as anarchy incarnate. If "Anarchy" were a dude, do you think he would have a fawking girlfriend? Heath's Joker may very well get his rape on, but he won't be dating, I assure you. Nolan will never ever evah go that route. Because it's fawking stupid, like that cartoon.

It's not stupid. Harley is a very real character and I think alot of people would find something interesting in her or at least room to feel sympathetic for her. We all know of girls who despite all logic and reason are bound destructivily to the 'wrong guy'. More specifically for Harley, it's Patti Hearst, the Manson girls, the references already exist. As Crook said there's alot more to Harley, at least in potential, that is readily evident in the cartoons or most comic books.

Also remember her relationship with joker is really only the starting point for the character, that part should be established ond moved on with fairly quickly. Even her first appearance in the comics, Joker has tried to murder her halfway through the book, Harley plans her revenge but in the end cannot go through with it.


Their relationship was never depicted as two people dating. In fact, it was quite the opposite. The whole love aspect was strictly one-sided on Harley's side. Joker was just plain manipulative and decided to take Harley on for whatever amusement he has. He'll have no regrets being violent or ditching her altogether at a moment's notice.

this is true. If it WERE a normal relationship, dating' of sorts well then yeah that wpuld be completly boring and unneccersarry.


Because, like it or not, a relationship is a relationship, even if it is an abusive one, and to have Harley in there would give them both a twisted, Honeymooners-vibe that would humanize the character.

And he's an absolute, remember?

but relationships are what movies are about. Batman has a very real relationship with the Joker, does that humanise him?

I don't think it's smart to have an utterly inhuman character as a villain, Batman may as well fight a hurricane or volcano if that will be the case. I know Nolans refers to Joker as an absolute but that doesn't mean there should never be recognisable human traits, emotions, fears, wants, desires etc evident in the Joker. To me those glimpses of humanity make a 'villain' much more frightening....it what we respond to as social beings. For instace when people point to TKJ as being one of the greatest portrayals of Joker I think much of it is owed to vulnerability of the Joker, something that is generally absent in other versions. I'm not talking so much about the scenes of his former life, but in the ending. When he tells Batman "it's far too late for that", he almost seems to regret his life for a moment, before consoling himself with a joke.

Going back to Joker being an "absolute", Nolan also said in the interview that his voice "goes from being quite high-pitched and eccentric to having these sort of moments of extraordinary anger and power where you just feel this guy’s anger at things. He’s very charismatic, but really quite frightening.

This is a great quote because it signals that Joker will indeed be a character with something very real to express, outside of all the hijinks and badarsery. He's not just a Clown Prince of Crime, a homicial manic, a fearless shark, and force of chaos, etc etc. He's a severely twisted, burnt out soul with a vendetta against the world, and there's something incredibily sad about that. The whole archetype he represents is a juxtapostion of comedy and tradgey, so it's important that there is some humanity there to create that tragic element. Having Harley around would add another dimension to all that i think


And yet I assure you that this will not put an end to Harley Quinn speculation, manips, and squabbling.

Why the hell would it? :oldrazz:
 
Great interview. Though I don't agree with Nolan that these "certain elements" couldn't have fit in this world. That seems to kind of confirm a lot of people's opinions that Nolan is kind of limiting himself.

Sure he's limiting himself, but Nolan's eye for tightness in pacing and overall quality seems to make up for whatever limit he places on the characters. In Burton's world, literally anything and everything could happen, which is exactly what was wrong with it. A prime example: penguins with rocket launchers. Another example: Joker kills Bruce's parents. I'd rather see a limited version of the Batman universe that is PROPERLY executed than one that has full potential but is not properly executed to reflect its potential.

As for Spidey 3. It was good. It was no Spider-Man 2, but it was hardly a Batman and Robin as people act.

You're right. It wasn't a Batman & Robin. It was a Batman Forever, which was a step up from Batman & Robin but still total garbage. :cwink:
 
That's why Nolan is such a good director, every film he works on, he works it like his last, with that mentality you force yourself to give it your all. I like his ideology, this movie will kick ass!
 
That Harley Quinn thing...just let it go! It ain't gonna happen. The character of Harley humanizes the Joker way too much and I don't like that. Yes, I know that they are not your average dating couple. Their relationship is very twisted but that doesn't change the fact that the Joker should not have a sidekick IMO. Not in Nolans universe anyway. He's an absolute and him having a "girlfriend" just shatters that illusion. He has no relationships, he does not care for other people, he is not a human being with human emotions. This is just the way I see it.

Batman having a sidekick is almost as bad and that's why I don't like the idea of introducing Robin in the future Batman movies. The Dark Knight is alone. That is one of the main reasons why he is so fascinating IMO. And same goes for the Joker. Sidekicks always tend to take something integral away from the main characters. Yes, sometimes they are abel to add something too but the cons usually over-shadow the pros IMO.
 
That Harley Quinn thing...just let it go! It ain't gonna happen. The character of Harley humanizes the Joker way too much and I don't like that. Yes, I know that they are not your average dating couple. Their relationship is very twisted but that doesn't change the fact that the Joker should not have a sidekick IMO. Not in Nolans universe anyway. He's an absolute and him having a "girlfriend" just shatters that illusion. He has no relationships, he does not care for other people, he is not a human being with human emotions. This is just the way I see it.

Batman having a sidekick is almost as bad and that's why I don't like the idea of introducing Robin in the future Batman movies. The Dark Knight is alone. That is one of the main reasons why he is so fascinating IMO. And same goes for the Joker. Sidekicks always tend to take something integral away from the main characters. Yes, sometimes they are abel to add something too but the cons usually over-shadow the pros IMO.

EXACTL!, joker is suppose to be a one man sinister force, if you give him a sidekick, I will be dissapointed, and the thought "oh just kill her already" will cross my mind multiple time. I don't want to see joker with sidekicks, I want to see joker a one man show taking out gotham city little by little and creating hell for batman, it's taking batman, gordon and harvey dent to take down the joker, this is makiing joker look extremely bad ass and giving him his glory. I want the joker a one man army, a force that cannot be wreckoned with.
 
Nolan: you could have a permawhite joker like you explained a tumbpler,batman suit,.......

but at least he said that he thought it would not fit into hes world.
 
Apparently so.

i wish he wouldn't lie then. Why can't he kust say; ''Yeah, i'm looking forward to doing a third.'' ???:whatever:

Man, if that script is being written NOW, then by the time shooting arrives thats going to be one lean script.:word:
 
What you have to keep in mind, there was a writing strike going on wasn't there?

That could of hindered writing for a third.
 
What you have to keep in mind, there was a writing strike going on wasn't there?

That could of hindered writing for a third.

I thought is was a sort of unofficial writting draft going on. That even WB didn't know about it. So that what Nolan OFFICIALLY says yes to a third, BANG, the sript is ready, and filming can begin asap.
 
I thought is was a sort of unofficial writting draft going on. That even WB didn't know about it. So that what Nolan OFFICIALLY says yes to a third, BANG, the sript is ready, and filming can begin asap.
It's not going to be that simple. Even if the script is all done when WB says yes, it would still have to be looked over, edited, discussed and all other things before filming can begin. Plus, you know, all the casting and set desgin and pre-production.
It's probably more of an outline than anything else.
 
his brother is already writing B3 isn't he?

It's just a rumor at this point. I think it's also worth noting that when David Goyer gave his outline of the second and third films he said that in the third film Dent would be scarred and become Two-Face. It has become clear that will happen in this movie, and Two-Face will be dealt with a little bit after the transformation. I feel like if Nolan doesn't feel he can top himself with a third Batman then he shouldn't have to.
 
Going back to Joker being an "absolute", Nolan also said in the interview that his voice "goes from being quite high-pitched and eccentric to having these sort of moments of extraordinary anger and power where you just feel this guy’s anger at things. He’s very charismatic, but really quite frightening.

This is a great quote because it signals that Joker will indeed be a character with something very real to express, outside of all the hijinks and badarsery. He's not just a Clown Prince of Crime, a homicial manic, a fearless shark, and force of chaos, etc etc. He's a severely twisted, burnt out soul with a vendetta against the world, and there's something incredibily sad about that. The whole archetype he represents is a juxtapostion of comedy and tradgey, so it's important that there is some humanity there to create that tragic element.
That is a very interesting analyse, well thought!
 
I'm kindof thinking the third film will be shot sooner rather than later, or atleast not 3 years apart again, with or WITHOUT Nolan.
 
I'm kindof thinking the third film will be shot sooner rather than later, or atleast not 3 years apart again, with or WITHOUT Nolan.

That depends largely on the availability of actors, whether or not they would do another picture, and a slew of pre-production work.
 
Do we get to see the origins of that frightening character in the film?

NOLAN: Without giving too much away, the way that I can describe it is that we don’t show the origin of the Joker, we show the rise of the Joker. It’s slightly a different thing. The whole movie is founded quite strongly on the basis [of an idea] at the end of “Batman Begins” when Ra’s Al Ghul talks about escalation. He talks about the increasingly bizarre and criminal reaction to Batman and the extremity of what Bruce Wayne is doing as Batman.

the only thing that confuses me is that why would he say "without giving too much away," if it's already been said that the joker has no origin?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,359
Messages
22,091,381
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"