Is Rothman having any input on Avatar? (I can't see how he could, I can't picture James Cameron taking it.)
Baz Luhrman is other one prolly.No, Cameron's one of the (very) few directors who gets 'carte blanche' from Fox = he can do whatever he wants to, similar to how Chris Nolan didn't get any notes or requests from Warner Bros when he was working on 'The Dark Knight'. So, 'Avatar' is safe as far as the movie itself goes, let's hope Fox doesn't screw up the marketing campaign.
Jackman said it was a truck in a press interview. He said that they all argued over the color of a truck and Rothman had it repainted because he is 'passionate about the character'. Now that to me is even more stupid that disagreeing over the color of a entire set but one truckso was it confirmed that Rothman repainted a set of wolverine?
WTF who cares...it is one measley truck
So, at the end of the day, Rothman mucked around and had something repainted to his liking.We can all take solace, at least, at the fact that they're being punished for these crimes by movie goers. Fox has been sinking since 2007, and this year they again have a lot of mediocre movies with over bloated budgets. Street Fighter and Dragonball are bound to, if there's any justice in the world Alvin and the Chipmunks 2 will fail (Then again, I thought the same would happen to the first one), and though on one hand it pains me to think of a James Cameron film being a flop, let's face it, with a $300,000,000 price tag, Avatar is bound to be too ambitious to make a lot of money back. That just leaves Ice Age 3 and Wolverine as far as heavy hitters go. now, Ice age is bound to do well, but with the controversy surrounding Rothman's changes to the film, and the way they royally ****ed up Deadpool, I don't think Wolverine is going to do as well as they'd like. I'm sure it will do well enough for itself, but I don't think we'll be seeing X3 numbers, or as much as they need.
If they get their asses handed to them again this year they have to change right... Right?

Who are the other directors who have this power?No, Cameron's one of the (very) few directors who gets 'carte blanche' from Fox.
If he was at one point, he sure as hell isn't anymore. Not after the bomb that was "Australia".Baz Luhrman is other one prolly.
Jackman said it was a truck in a press interview. He said that they all argued over the color of a truck and Rothman had it repainted because he is 'passionate about the character'. Now that to me is even more stupid that disagreeing over the color of a entire set but one truckWTF who cares...it is one measley truck
So, at the end of the day, Rothman mucked around and had something repainted to his liking.
Who are the other directors who have this power?
If he was at one point, he sure as hell isn't anymore. Not after the bomb that was "Australia".
i agree. who repaints a truck on location?Doesn't make a lick of sense. Rothman had someone go on set and repaint a truck when Hood was elsewhere? Thats a load of malarkey right there.
Is that even within the realm of possibility to paint a vehicle on location?
Total BS.

Who are the other directors who have this power?

Anybody think Rothman could cut down the runtime of the Oscars to 90 minutes? Maybe add some more action to the show?
Here Alex Proyas commenting on his experiences with Fox and Tom Rothman.
http://chud.com/articles/articles/1...MMAKERS-AWAY-FROM-WORKING-WITH-FOX/Page1.html
Didn't some other director come out and say that he was never again working with Fox? Revolution is in the air.
Tim Burton, Stephen Norrington and Mathieu Kassovitz, at least.Didn't some other director come out and say that he was never again working with Fox? Revolution is in the air.