Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]517735[/split]
Suicide Squad, Hot Topic BF Joker characterization sucks.
Leto's Joker performance sucks. Theatrical or extended cut.
Jared Leto himself, sucks.
http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2016/08/jared-leto-bad-actor
I want to see if it still happens first.While not officially confirmed, it seems reasonable to assume that Jared Leto will be popping up in Affleck's solo film in some capacity.
What will his involvement be? Will he be the main villain or part of an ensemble? Will Affleck keep the tats and grillz? And after seeing Suicide Squad, are you even interested in seeing him again? Let's speculate wildly!
While not officially confirmed, it seems reasonable to assume that Jared Leto will be popping up in Affleck's solo film in some capacity.
What will his involvement be? Will he be the main villain or part of an ensemble? Will Affleck keep the tats and grillz? And after seeing Suicide Squad, are you even interested in seeing him again? Let's speculate wildly!
The Joker look isn't that much of a problem. Its more the style of clothes.
Keep him in the black Tux or classic purple outfit.
I think Jared Leto's Joker is salvageable with a better script and direction
I think Jared Leto's Joker is salvageable with a better script and direction. It seems like Leto just isn't a good improviser and needs a solid structure/sandbox to play in. Hopefully whoever takes over for Ben Affleck can provide that for him. They could write Joker as changing his look/style in a "this town deserves a better class of criminal" style speech and wanting to get "back to basics."
The Joker look isn't that much of a problem. Its more the style of clothes.
Keep him in the black Tux or classic purple outfit.
This.
That's my opinion, too. In spite of how horrible Letoker was, he can be saved with a complete revamp in visual design, writing, and direction.
Leto's a great actor. He has it in him to be a great Joker if they just steer him right.
Perfect example of his lack of improv skills (for the Joker at least) is this Joker promo where they film an actor in front of a green screen and tell them to do something.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mz3OlaG9l9U
First 5 seconds or so he looks like he has no idea what to do and just does a "snarl" at the last minute.
That was ok for the promo...didn't think that would be the limit in the film.
Odd thing is he seems really fun/charismatic in the behind the scenes clips.
So I think the issue is he has trouble balancing the fun, but intimidating nature of the Joker.
I do think he can get better with a solid foundation and clear direction.
Perfect example of his lack of improv skills (for the Joker at least) is this Joker promo where they film an actor in front of a green screen and tell them to do something.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mz3OlaG9l9U
First 5 seconds or so he looks like he has no idea what to do and just does a "snarl" at the last minute.
Why does that make it count suddenly? The version people have a problem with is the theatrical version.
I'm not sure what your stance is here Guard. You are a very smart and intelligent poster here. The problem people have is Joker's depiction in the theatrical cut. You can't deflect and excuse the way the character was executed by pointing out the extended cut as some piece of redemption.
Just like in The Avengers, there was this great three-minute scene with Captain America sort of setting the tone for him being the man out of time and his sense of loneliness and isolation in the modern world. It's fantastic work. Evans puts in a great performance in it. But we never saw that scene in the theatrical cut. All we can do is lament that it didn't get put in.
The clothes aren't much of a problem, either. Or imo, at least. The one influence that needs to go is the Scarface-esque open shirt. It just doesn't work.
But either way, I definitely agree he should largely be seen in either a black tux or a classic purple suit. Or a purple tux.
Bit of a blanket statement there. Plenty of people have issues with the character in both versions of the film.
I'm just saying that you cannot argue that assessing the extended cut as its own film "doesn't count" simply because many critics of the film didn't see that version. It exists, it's an actual film.
It may not improve the film's critical reception, but it can garner it's own reception as a seperate film. And therefore, does very much count as a piece of art.
You can certainly recognize the issues in the theatrical cut and suggest that there is a much better portrayal in the extended cut, which is a completely different movie.
Which is unfortunate, but this is not just like that at all. The scenes that improve the extended cut actually exist within a film...in the extended cut of SUICIDE SQUAD.
Agreed on the open shirt Scarface look not working. There's some scenes in the film where I don't like the way he talks, but other scenes I do. Overall he looks good to me. The hair is great and the tattoos don't bother me.
The grillz I can do with or without, if he didn't have them I'd be even happier. But him having them also doesn't bother me much. His look I loved the most was the black tux.