Hollis Mason
Civilian
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2019
- Messages
- 805
- Reaction score
- 973
- Points
- 83
You could say...
It's a rise up...
It's a rise up...
How the hell was Ledger’s Joker a “flashy cb villain”?
79% with 149 reviews and it's still not certified fresh hahaStill not Certified Fresh, though...
It seems to me that the root of most of the criticism towards this movie seems to be political. In which case, it's not really a wholly objective appraisal of the movie's actual merits, is it?
He was a superhumanly competent mastermind, with an outlandish persona, executing plots on a large scale to prove philosophical points in a grandiose manner, while dueling with an equally superhumanly competent heroic rival. In what way was he *not* a flashy comicbook villain?
Top Critics?Back to back 2/4 rottens to drop back to 78
Out of context this makes Joker look like Scrooge McDuck.Plus, there's this
![]()
Is that a problem?Yeah, ANOTHER review complaining about the violence.
Is that a problem?
1 of them ... Anne Hornaday of Washington Post.Top Critics?
1 of them ... Anne Hornaday of Washington Post.
Again though, almost all the negatives are coming from US critics. It's quite fascinating.
D.W. Griffith didn’t even make the movie to push that agenda. He liked the book the film was based on and wanted to use his talents to make an epic. It didn’t help he got super defensive to criticisms that it was a racist movie but that’s beside the point.The themes and messages a movie chooses to examine *are* part of its merits. Birth of a Nation was a revolution in the technical craft of movie making. This will *never, ever* matter more than that it uses said craft to push KKK propaganda.
It's not a big deal. He said people got offended easily and they proved his point... by getting offended.Call me crazy, but I don't see what the big deal is with these Todd Phillips comments.
Sounded to me like he was exaggerating and half joking about "woke culture", talking out of his ass in what was certainly a much lengthier interview than those few sentences, but he's still expressing a somewhat valid concern about comedies/comedians being afraid to offend people and take heat. "Cancel culture" would have been more appropriate. Either way, who cares if he wanted out of the comedy arena or why?
I do welcome him saying he wanted to take the comic book universe and turn it on its head with this. We need films like this, more variety and diversity in comic book movie storytelling. Different viewpoints. I haven't seen the film yet, but going by all the news, reviews, "controversy", hype, and conversation surrounding Joker, it seems like Phillips succeeded -- or at least got what he wanted.
Said this a few days ago, but the Hangover is going to age fine. That'll always be regarded as an early comedy classic of this millennium.
Yeah Burr talks about this a lot. Any time he's asked about his "controversial" style he immediately goes on one of his beautiful rants about how 100 people whining on twitter isn't a "controversy", it's a self-perpetuating cycle of anger and then attention and then more anger aimed at those 100 people, and then wake up the next day and do it again about something else.
Almost every single one of those quoted films/series got a lot of backlash. Specially Dave Chappelle and South Park. So i don't see what point are you making. And Jojo Rabbit got crucified by critics at MC.
There was a screening at Stockholm. People seem to have loved the movie there, too.