DarthSkywalker
🦉Your Most Aggro Pal (he/him)
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2004
- Messages
- 133,277
- Reaction score
- 81,152
- Points
- 203
That is excuse right there.It's not an excuse. Obviously, chance of failure is much higher when you attempt to do something new.

That is excuse right there.It's not an excuse. Obviously, chance of failure is much higher when you attempt to do something new.

I mean this isnt exactly a flattering first reveal either lol:
![]()
I mean this isnt exactly a flattering first reveal either lol:
![]()
I mean this isnt exactly a flattering first reveal either lol:
![]()
A faulty comparison. Ledger looked absolutely fantastic in the film and in stills.I mean this isnt exactly a flattering first reveal either lol:
![]()
You probably just can't tell difference between excuse and reason.That is excuse right there.![]()
I see what you're saying, but at the end of the day, Ledger was still attached to a Batman sequel. If you didn't like his look, that was one thing(I loved it), as it was still very much within a Batman story. This is outside of a Batman story, where he wont even be apart of this movie, and we have a guy named Arthur, who puts on clown makeup, that looks nothing like The Joker....but it's supposed to be The Joker? I was really open to this movie, but now I'm really not understanding the point of even tying it to The Joker.I think whether or not it's the Joker's final look in the movie, we're gonna be seeing this anyway. Or some slight variation. And well, the Joker IS pretty much a serial killer in clown make-up. This reminds me so much of Heath Ledger's Joker reveal on WhySoSerious.com.![]()
Wait, seriously? This isn't even in Gotham?No. It takes place in New York. 1981.
Nowhere have I read that this movie takes place in New York City. Heck, you got the Amusement Mile which is a location in Gotham in the comics.
Set photos did show Arthur smoking and anti smoking groups are pretty hard on the mpaa from letting tobacco use in movies be G, PG, or PG-13.So I take it... this movie will be rated PG-13?![]()
Neither have I.
And the beauty is there is so much mystery around the Joker's alter-ego, that you can play around it any way you want. I wouldn't write this off as a Joker movie just yet, simply because we haven't even seen a damn teaser trailer.

It does make sense that Snyder would say that playing it safe is the boring route to go. He did cut off the Joker's face and have him wear it as a mask.Scott Synder's thoughts basically reflect mine:
I see what you're saying, but at the end of the day, Ledger was still attached to a Batman sequel. If you didn't like his look, that was one thing(I loved it), as it was still very much within a Batman story. This is outside of a Batman story, where he wont even be apart of this movie, and we have a guy named Arthur, who puts on clown makeup, that looks nothing like The Joker....but it's supposed to be The Joker? I was really open to this movie, but now I'm really not understanding the point of even tying it to The Joker.
Where was that confirmed? The set photos did show them in Amusement Mile.No. It takes place in New York. 1981.
mine as well! We are all hoping for the bestScott Synder's thoughts basically reflect mine:
That image still gives me chills to this day, honestly. The moment i saw it I thought it was perfection and indeed it was and still is. its iconic!I mean this isnt exactly a flattering first reveal either lol:
![]()