The Losers Lounge

Status
Not open for further replies.
If it turns out well, there is going to be endless analysis of movieclips and how it was totes DaddySnyder who directed that scene.
So if it turns out well, Snyder is God. If it turns out bad, Whedon is the devil that ruined DaddySnyder's vision?
 
... i don't even know what is happening right now... BvS? Snyder? Diddlers?


wtf are you people on about?

oh and JL is going to suck! MUAHAHHAHAHAHHA
 
Did he accuse Snyder of being misogynist? Faraci was actually a fan of Snyders and one of his defenders(though he hated BvS).

He did directly over twitter. Both him and his/DC fans. So I do believe they have a right to comment on that given what happened despite certain people’s poor attempts at sarcasm.
 
He did directly over twitter. Both him and his/DC fans. So I do believe they have a right to comment on that given what happened despite certain people’s poor attempts at sarcasm.
Does Farcai being a misogynist change that Snyder has a real problem with the vast majority of his female characters?
 
Yeah, using Faraci's downfall to attempt to undermine or de-legitimize actual valid arguments made against Snyder's work (by plenty of people OTHER than Faraci, I might add) is just tacky, imo.
 
Does he? There’s a lot I dislike about his films but I don’t see any real problem at all with the female roles in his films. And that whole blanket fan base which includes women feel like the accusation from a misogynist was wrong they have the right to comment.
 
Bay and Snyder are champions of women.
 
Does he? There’s a lot I dislike about his films but I don’t see any real problem at all with the female roles in his films. And that whole blanket fan base which includes women feel like the accusation from a misogynist was wrong they have the right to comment.
Yeah, I think he does. But considering your last sentence, this ain't going anywhere.
 
Does he? There’s a lot I dislike about his films but I don’t see any real problem at all with the female roles in his films. And that whole blanket fan base which includes women feel like the accusation from a misogynist was wrong they have the right to comment.
But "commenting" wasn't really what that post was doing. It was insinuating his "haters" (and they didn't even specify what kind of criticism they were referring to) were turning out to be sexual predators, which is an absolute BS argument. He has a lot of "haters." For many different things. The odds when you gather that many people into a group are that a few of them probably will be ****ty humans. Doesn't negate or invalidate the argument that all those people were making, which is exactly what that post was trying to do.
 
And truthfully from what I’ve been told you should all brace for more news about bloggers being sexual predators. You’ve only seen the tip of the iceberg.
 
And truthfully from what I’ve been told you should all brace for more news about bloggers being sexual predators. You’ve only seen the tip of the iceberg.
That won't even surprise me, given the culture that these bloggers rose to popularity in.
 
But "commenting" wasn't really what that post was doing. It was insinuating his "haters" (and they didn't even specify what kind of criticism they were referring to) were turning out to be sexual predators, which is an absolute BS argument. He has a lot of "haters." For many different things. The odds when you gather that many people into a group are that a few of them probably will be ****ty humans. Doesn't negate or invalidate the argument that all those people were making, which is exactly what that post was trying to do.

I didn’t read that as all the “haters” but the ones that specifically turned out to be horrid so that could be a mistake on my part. I think that if a critic turns out to be a sexual predator then their opinions on any film, from any studio ostensibly about fighting crime is worthless because they obviously have a skewed sense of morality even if there’s merit to the argument.
 
I didn’t read that as all the “haters” but the ones that specifically turned out to be horrid so that could be a mistake on my part. I think that if a critic turns out to be a sexual predator then their opinions on any film, from any studio ostensibly about fighting crime is worthless because they obviously have a skewed sense of morality even if there’s merit to the argument.
That much I agree with - I've ALWAYS hated Faraci's "criticism" anyway. But yes, even if I followed it before, I certainly wouldn't put any stock in it now. Still, that post reads to me like it's blatantly trying to lump all of Snyder's critics into the Faraci boat, which is the part that I find to be not only laughable, but also to be in generally poor taste.
 
I didn’t read that as all the “haters” but the ones that specifically turned out to be horrid so that could be a mistake on my part. I think that if a critic turns out to be a sexual predator then their opinions on any film, from any studio ostensibly about fighting crime is worthless because they obviously have a skewed sense of morality even if there’s merit to the argument.

But who cares about that? Get angry at Faraci for being a sexually abusive *******, but going "See! He was a sexual predator, therefore his argument against Snyder was invalid" really seems petty and missing the ****ing point.
 
That much I agree with - I've ALWAYS hated Faraci's "criticism" anyway. But yes, even if I followed it before, I certainly wouldn't put any stock in it now. Still, that post reads to me like it's blatantly trying to lump all of Snyder's critics into the Faraci boat, which is the part that I find to be not only laughable, but also to be in generally poor taste.
It at best lumps any similar criticism that Faraci might have shared in the same boat. As if it invalidates it, no matter the source.
 
That much I agree with - I've ALWAYS hated Faraci's "criticism" anyway. But yes, even if I followed it before, I certainly wouldn't put any stock in it now. Still, that post reads to me like it's blatantly trying to lump all of Snyder's critics into the Faraci boat, which is the part that I find to be not only laughable, but also to be in generally poor taste.

Well I really don’t care enough to engage that Facebook page for specifics, but yeah I hope they weren’t lumping everyone on the same boat.

I hate modern film criticism to be fair, I’d rather watch some kids on YouTube break down a film with actual analysis than read elitist snark and personal attacks.
 
Well I really don’t care enough to engage that Facebook page for specifics, but yeah I hope they weren’t lumping everyone on the same boat.

I hate modern film criticism to be fair, I’d rather watch some kids on YouTube break down a film with actual analysis than read elitist snark and personal attacks.
This is all modern film criticism...
 
I think the world view that every critic is Armond White is unfounded. Most critics I've read are passionate movie fans who are doing their best, even if I don't agree with them. It's the same dead horse the film industry goes to when blaming RT for bad BO.
 
... i don't even know what is happening right now... BvS? Snyder? Diddlers?


wtf are you people on about?

oh and JL is going to suck! MUAHAHHAHAHAHHA

Basically a load of neckbeards sexually harassed people and Bryan Singer probably had his long, evil tendrils involved. Zaddy is a terrible director and Bryan Singer is gonna diddle his son
 
Snyder has more of a fundamental right to exist on this earth than Faraci, Knowles, Signore and the rest of their degenerates.
 
Bah, what has modern medicine done to cure Harry Knowles of his affliction? That man needs Jesus, though in a case as bad as his he might need more...multiple Jesuses.
 
This is my new go to reaction.
tumblr_oxfeqjFLK31tbealgo1_540.png
Today it goes to that facebook page post.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"