Batman '89 The Michael Keaton Appreciation Thread

There's a big difference that you can't compare. In my belief, in Batman 89, we see an older Bruce Wayne. In Batman Begins/The Dark Knight, Bruce Wayne is still relatively young. Pretend that eventually, after whatever last [Nolan] installment for the Batman series, Batman is a much later sequel with Batman being a little older (late 30s?). Perfect, at least I think so. However, Jack Napier will NOT be the Joker, but as himself.

I agree. Mastering countless martial arts, and then utilizing them every night to consistently win against criminals probably wouldn't give you any sort of confidence.

LOL :cwink:
 
What I liked most about Keaton was actually his confidence when he was Batman. Keaton's Batman never doubted himself. He never had any moments where he would wonder if it was a bad idea or if he should quit being Batman.

Never thought of it that way. But yes, Keaton wouldn't think Dent's better than the goddamn Batman. :woot:
 
Yeh, I think that's pretty much the same thing.
 
haerd about that a few days ago, awesome news hopefully Ken & Barbie in Toy Story 3 will have a bigger role than Barbie's all too brief role in Toy Story 2.
 
Funny that, I was thinking about which franchises some of my favourite underused actors could join. Keaton seems to have found a steady relaionship with Disney. Imagine if that could branch out into live action. Pirates of the Carribean 4 anyone?
 
Keaton is awesome, the one complaint I did have was that he killed people and his Bruce was essential non-existent and a reporter didn't even know him :dry:

But he's a great actor. Loved Beetlejuice and Johnny Dangerously.
 
Funny that, I was thinking about which franchises some of my favourite underused actors could join. Keaton seems to have found a steady relaionship with Disney. Imagine if that could branch out into live action. Pirates of the Carribean 4 anyone?

I hated Pirates 2 so much that I never have and never will waste time watching Pirates 3 but I'd see a fourth if they included Keaton.
 
no.. i love Keaton the actor.

Well, between that and your rantings in Burton's birthday thread....

Cain said:
I hated Pirates 2 so much that I never have and never will waste time watching Pirates 3 but I'd see a fourth if they included Keaton.

FYI, Pirates 3 is just a more rushed Pirates 2. So you'd probably hate it. I'm not the biggest Pirates fan either, but it's the only live action Disney franchise I can think of.
 
Well, between that and your rantings in Burton's birthday thread....
I'm just not the biggest fan of Burton and all that he's done.. I'm really not a fan of how he's hailed as essentially a profit in the Batman fandom and the world as a whole now that being kooky and weird has become popular.
 
Keaton is awesome, the one complaint I did have was that he killed people

It was actually Batman who killed people. But since Keaton was extraordinary as Batman, you confusing them both is just natural. :)

and his Bruce was essential non-existent and a reporter didn't even know him :dry:

Knox knew who he was. It's just that Keaton's Wayne was a low profile character.
 
It was actually Batman who killed people. But since Keaton was extraordinary as Batman, you confusing them both is just natural. :)



Knox knew who he was. It's just that Keaton's Wayne was a low profile character.
Knox knew him after he introduced himself :dry:
 
Knox knew him after he introduced himself :dry:

Yeah, after he introduced himself. A big name millionaire in Gotham shouldn't be a stranger to any reporter in Gotham. They should recognise his face right away.

But Keaton's Bruce Wayne was low profile.
 
Yeah, after he introduced himself. A big name millionaire in Gotham shouldn't be a stranger to any reporter in Gotham. They should recognise his face right away.

But Keaton's Bruce Wayne was low profile.

Burton was making a point about Bruce's identity, he's a recluse, a little-boy lost, completely detatched from society. Burton takes Bruce's charade as a playboy to extremes; Bruce throws lavish parties, yet barely even knows how to behave with people.
 
Burton was making a point about Bruce's identity, he's a recluse, a little-boy lost, completely detatched from society. Burton takes Bruce's charade as a playboy to extremes; Bruce throws lavish parties, yet barely even knows how to behave with people.

I think that's how Bruce behaves when he grows older, not the younger Bruce we see in BB/TDK.
 
Burton takes Bruce's charader as a playboy to extremes; Bruce throws lavish parties, yet barely even knows how to behave with people.

I agree with the second part but the first part I disagree, it was hardly to the extreme sure he throws one or two lavish party's but when compared to Nolan's movies Burton's Bruce is a rather timid playboy don't you think?
 
I agree with the second part but the first part I disagree, it was hardly to the extreme sure he throws one or two lavish party's but when compared to Nolan's movies Burton's Bruce is a rather timid playboy don't you think?

Okay, let me rephrase; the gulf between what Bruce is (isolated, brooding loner) and what he pretends to be (playboy philanthropist) is extreme. I think it's a fascinating performance, certainly in the first movie. It's beguiling and bemusing, he's like a lost child in a man's body. He's certainly the oddest Bruce Wayne.
 
Okay, let me rephrase; the gulf between what Bruce is (isolated, brooding loner) and what he pretends to be (playboy philanthropist) is extreme. I think it's a fascinating performance, certainly in the first movie. It's beguiling and bemusing, he's like a lost child in a man's body. He's certainly the oddest Bruce Wayne.

thanks for clearing it up, I thought you might of meant it something like that & I agree with you but everybody knows West's Bruce was the oddest, pedo written all over him :wow:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"