The New Ghostbusters - Part 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
zy7bfa.gif

I dislike sounding like 'one of those people' but this movie gives some ammo to those who feel like that on a radical level.

Instead of just planning a good movie and letting the chips fall where they may, it seems like a deliberate attempt to turn an iconic property into a feminist piece.

Shame. It's only going to hurt their own box office and turn their efforts into a wasted opportunity
 
The original Ghostbusters team was all male. Why is that okay but not an all female team?
Because some people are sexist and they don't even realize that they are. A lot of people who might believe that they have progressive views instantly believe that a Star Wars film starring a woman and a black guy is gimmicky, any genre film not starring a white male is gimmicky according to some people. Women should only be love interests or at best a supporting character who kicks butt, the same goes for non white males.

Those feelings are because Hollywood only gave us one point of view for decades and decades so it's an understandable reaction to a certain degree. It is going to take us a long time to even begin to correct the white male is the only lead idea.
 
I don't see how it's a gimmick to have an all-female team when it wasn't a gimmick to have an all-male team.

Lawd.

Maybe you should think about the difference of creating an idea or concept and piggybacking off that already successful brand and established name.

Maybe then you will see the difference and why you being perplexed at people's perceptions is foolish
 
Because some people are sexist and they don't even realize that they are. A lot of people who might believe that they have progressive views instantly believe that a Star Wars film starring a woman and a black guy is gimmicky, any genre film not starring a white male is gimmicky according to some people. Women should only be love interests or at best a supporting character who kicks butt, the same goes for non white males.

Those feelings are because Hollywood only gave us one point of view for decades and decades so it's an understandable reaction to a certain degree. It is going to take us a long time to even begin to correct the white male is the only lead idea.

There have always been well-written female and minority characters in film, so it's nothing new. It's just that more people are wary of it now because we live in a political climate where often (not always) they are written into media solely for politically correct reasons. People aren't anti-woman or anti-minority, they're anti-pandering; they don't like it when characters are forced into media (particularly existing properties) in an inorganic fashion. Just calling anybody who doesn't agree with it "racist" or "sexist" doesn't help, it only makes things worse and gives off a condescending holier-than-thou attitude that's really off-putting.
With that said, I have no dog in this particular fight. I just felt like I had to explain why some people are mad about this (from what I can tell).
 
I'm not familiar with her, but after seeing McKinnon in that SNL skit with Ryan Gosling, not only was she funny, but she's also a great actor. If this movie is a success, I see her going places. I don't see her being on SNL much longer given that talent.
 
Last edited:
There have always been well-written female and minority characters in film, so it's nothing new. It's just that more people are wary of it now because we live in a political climate where often (not always) they are written into media solely for politically correct reasons. People aren't anti-woman or anti-minority, they're anti-pandering; they don't like it when characters are forced into media (particularly existing properties) in an inorganic fashion. Just calling anybody who doesn't agree with it "racist" or "sexist" doesn't help, it only makes things worse and gives off a condescending holier-than-thou attitude that's really off-putting.
With that said, I have no dog in this particular fight. I just felt like I had to explain why some people are mad about this (from what I can tell).
Not a shocking response coming from you. More people are wary of it now because those people have to share now and they want all of the pie. Guess what, they can't have all of the pie anymore so they might as well deal with it.:csad:

White males still have 90% of the pie so it's a little early to be complaining about underrepresentation.
 
Because some people are sexist and they don't even realize that they are. A lot of people who might believe that they have progressive views instantly believe that a Star Wars film starring a woman and a black guy is gimmicky, any genre film not starring a white male is gimmicky according to some people. Women should only be love interests or at best a supporting character who kicks butt, the same goes for non white males.

Those feelings are because Hollywood only gave us one point of view for decades and decades so it's an understandable reaction to a certain degree. It is going to take us a long time to even begin to correct the white male is the only lead idea.

Seeing right through an obvious ploy is not being sexist.
Furiousa is one of the best characters of the past few years.
I hate the idea of this movie in theory. Those two ideas wouldn't co-exist within a bonafide sexist. :gngl:

The fact that so many people dislike this idea for the same reasons and the overwhelming sexist labels are funny because name another project where so many posters HERE (Not Twitter or anything) are unhappy about female leads or whatever hate-label you want attach for a specific group... It won't be in the droves that it seems to be for this.

Perhaps the idea is just overwhelmingly terrible. Genuine people see right through manufactured crap.
 
We're playing catch up after decades of marginalization, man. That is the long and short of it.
 
Why should I give a flying **** about their tears? They get what they want 90% of the time, I'm not feeling bad for them. The idea that I should feel bad for them is absurd. As far as I'm concerned, there is no other side. I 100% back Paul Feig, I back him on twitter, I back him on SuperHero Hype and I will back him in real life. I love that he is making films starring women, I will forever love him for doing that.
 
Last edited:
There was one good Ghostbusters movie 30 years ago, I really don't care about this film one way or another, if the trailer amuses me I might check it out.

Did they change the cast to all female as the new thing is to take white or male characters and race/gender change them? I dunno, but I think any all male cast would have had difficulty shaping up to the cult popularity of the original 4 so this way they avoid that.
 
I haven't been in this thread much because it seems crazy in here. But any news on when we might get our first trailer and look at this?
 
I haven't been in this thread much because it seems crazy in here. But any news on when we might get our first trailer and look at this?

I'd be surprised if they don't try to get a trailer with TFA.
 
Not a shocking response coming from you. More people are wary of it now because those people have to share now and they want all of the pie. Guess what, they can't have all of the pie anymore so they might as well deal with it.:csad:

White males still have 90% of the pie so it's a little early to be complaining about underrepresentation.

Why should I give a flying **** about their tears? They get what they want 90% of the time, I'm not feeling bad for them. The idea that I should feel bad for them is absurd. As far as I'm concerned, there is no other side. I 100% back Paul Feig, I back him on twitter, I back him on SuperHero Hype and I will back him in real life. I love that he is making films starring women, I will forever love him for doing that.

Look, I'm more than happy to discuss this in a civil manner, but petulant responses like this don't do you any other favors, what with you trying to dehumanize people on the other side of the fence.
 
Most of the time I hate remakes because some films don't need remakes and more importantly there is not enough focus on actually making the remakes good in their own right.

If some are against the reboot because they believe it's blasphemy fine, I thought the same thing about Robocop being remade. My comments are directed towards people whining about an all female cast while never whining about the opposite. That is who I am talking about and do not regret not caring about those people's tears.

EDIT: Since when have you ever been deserving of respect Napoleon? You are practically always wrong when it comes to this type of stuff. :Grrr, I'm okay with whitewashing but an all female GhostBusters is evil!"
 
Last edited:
At this point, the amount of trailers before TFA will have a runtime as long as the film.

Haha! True, I mean how many are we up to now? I'm reckoning 7 before Ghsotbusters?

Most of the time I hate remakes because some films don't need remakes and more importantly there is not enough focus on actually making the remakes good in their own right.

If some are against the reboot because they believe it's blasphemy fine, I thought the same thing about Robocop being remade. My comments are directed towards people whining about an all female cast while never whining about the opposite. That is who I am talking about and do no regret no caring about those people's tears.

The thing I find odd is that whatever route they were going it would sting if you are a hardcore fan of Ghostbusters, Yet some seem like they'd be fine if they recast new guys to play the old characters which is a uphill battle to match the rose tinted childhood rooted view of the originals.

I mean I don't want to see them ever remake BTTF but I'm not sure it makes a difference if they sex change the lead as no guy is going to match up to MJF so might as well go for a whole new spin if they are intent on a remake.

The bottom line is the original remains untouched and as it was, so at the end of the day it's not a big deal.
 
Why should I give a flying **** about their tears? They get what they want 90% of the time, I'm not feeling bad for them. The idea that I should feel bad for them is absurd. As far as I'm concerned, there is no other side. I 100% back Paul Feig, I back him on twitter, I back him on SuperHero Hype and I will back him in real life. I love that he is making films starring women, I will forever love him for doing that.


A healthy, well-adjusted human being, ladies and gentleman.
 
The thing I find odd is that whatever route they were going it would sting if you are a hardcore fan of Ghostbusters, Yet some seem like they'd be fine if they recast new guys to play the old characters which is a uphill battle to match the rose tinted childhood rooted view of the originals.

Oh man, not me Hunter.

I've said before that the only thing that would have royally pissed me off as a fan is if they recast the original roles with new actors. That would have been a recipe for disaster.
 
I fail to see the agenda in this cast. Sony hired Paul Feig, after years and years of non-starters with Akroyd. Feig has had some success, so it should make sense. But, let's look at the movies he has had success with. See a trend? It is quite honestly where his "I just think women are funnier" line comes from. He has had TREMENDOUS success with female lead comedies. So, it really doesn't seem like some grand PC conspiracy here. It just one guy staying within his safe zone.

And once you realize how important it can be for minorities to see representation, you find all the arguments about "pandering" to be really disgusting.
 
I fail to see the agenda in this cast. Sony hired Paul Feig, after years and years of non-starters with Akroyd. Feig has had some success, so it should make sense. But, let's look at the movies he has had success with. See a trend? It is quite honestly where his "I just think women are funnier" line comes from. He has had TREMENDOUS success with female lead comedies. So, it really doesn't seem like some grand PC conspiracy here. It just one guy staying within his safe zone.

And once you realize how important it can be for minorities to see representation, you find all the arguments about "pandering" to be really disgusting.

-You forgetting the part where he cast the hunky sex symbol as the team's secretary in a forced attempt to turn history on its head? Gimmie a break.

-Yea there's never been any strong female leads represented in the history of film... this director is breaking brand new ground:hmr:
 
I'm not familiar with her, but after seeing McKinnon in that SNL skit with Ryan Gosling, not only was she funny, but she's also a great actor. If this movie is a success, I see her going places. I don't see her being on SNL much longer given that talent.
she is very good IMO. i hope she becomes a big star.

she is also gay .
ka8PvHa.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,268
Messages
22,077,181
Members
45,876
Latest member
Crazygamer3011
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"