T
The Stranger
Guest
The Dark Knight didn't really feel like a sequel to Batman Begins to me. It just had a different atmosphere, and Gotham didn't seem as dark.
The Dark Knight didn't really feel like a sequel to Batman Begins to me. It just had a different atmosphere, and Gotham didn't seem as dark.
You are right. For consistencies sake, they should have had some Wayne-monorail shots, at the least. Or Wayne tower.
I'm glad they left out the "Narrows" and the streets looked more like a stage set than an actual street in Begins.
I understand what you are saying here but I think Nolan is trying to point out that Batman's fight is a continuous cycle. He helped clean up Gotham and it felt more like a real city instead of a crapshoot and then when Joker came he threw a monkey wrench into it which shot Batman back down to the bottom. I bet in the third film Batman will be hated in the beginning but be loved again at the end of the movie.
batman's gonna need an ally in the next movie. whether it be robin, jason bard, or whatever..gordon's job keeps him from being able to be batman's friend.
Me neither. I was too involved with the film every time.I didn't even notice
See I'm from Chicago, and I think it adds to the experience. I know this is Gotham and not Chicago, but the fact that I recognize and have been on those same gritty city streets makes the film even all the more real to me. And more enjoyable.I understand that Nolan's going for a real city. But I would be completely distracted if I could recognize minor landmarks and locations. It would take me out of the experience and I'm grateful I'm not a Chicago resident for the reason that I can't recognize most of the locations.
See I'm from Chicago, and I think it adds to the experience. I know this is Gotham and not Chicago, but the fact that I recognize and have been on those same gritty city streets makes the film even all the more real to me. And more enjoyable.I understand that Nolan's going for a real city. But I would be completely distracted if I could recognize minor landmarks and locations. It would take me out of the experience and I'm grateful I'm not a Chicago resident for the reason that I can't recognize most of the locations.
See I'm from Chicago, and I think it adds to the experience. I know this is Gotham and not Chicago, but the fact that I recognize and have been on those same gritty city streets makes the film even all the more real to me. And more enjoyable.
Nolan should use the Tribune Tower more often. This building and many others in Chicago screams Gotham City
![]()
I'm with you, i preferred the Gotham City feel from BB... i found it kinda distracting at times in TDK because it just felt like a totally different city than the one in BB for me.Having seen the movie three times now, I have had a chance to focus on some of the less obvious things, like the various sets used in the film, and on that note I have to say I much preferred the versions of Gotham City from Batman Begins and even Batman '89.
same here!!! although my Simeon Wolverines were there in '86!!I loved Gotham in The Dark Knight. I am from the Chicago area, and I thought it was so cool being able to recognize 90% of the places in the film. I had a band concert in the place where Harvey Dent gave his "a new dawn is coming" speech! The batpod drove through the train station that I used to commute to and from the city every weekday. I ate at the restaurant where Gordon arrested the mob guys (I actually went with my grandpa there for his birthday). In my opinion, watching the Dark Knight and knowing that those scenes were shot in places where you have been thousands of times is a really cool feeling.
I like that gotham looks like a real city. It adds to the more realistic feel of the Nolan Batman universe. Also too, gotham looks a lot more grand in this movie than in batman begins, perhaps hinting at the improvements that were caused by batman, harvey, and gordon ridding the city of crime between the two movies.
The cop parade? the citizens everywhere at the end of the movie? the reason no one was on the streets in the Joker / Batman showdown on lower whacker was because it was late at night and was supposed to have a creepy 3 in the morning type feel. and even then, joker's shooting up civilian cars during that scenePersonally, I didn't have a problem with the look of the city, such as the architecture and mood, but I had more of a problem that we didn't see enough of the people of Gotham and not enough people on the streets. It felt like it was just Batman, Joker and the cops on the streets. I think the production team overlooked that aspect. Without seeing the citizens of Gotham and the danger and fear that they sense towards the rise in criminality, then it feels like there's something missing in order to add to the character of Gotham.
The cop parade? the citizens everywhere at the end of the movie? the reason no one was on the streets in the Joker / Batman showdown on lower whacker was because it was late at night and was supposed to have a creepy 3 in the morning type feel. and even then, joker's shooting up civilian cars during that scene
The cop parade? the citizens everywhere at the end of the movie? the reason no one was on the streets in the Joker / Batman showdown on lower whacker was because it was late at night and was supposed to have a creepy 3 in the morning type feel. and even then, joker's shooting up civilian cars during that scene