So how does he locate the muggers?
Oh, how does Batman "disappear"? How does Batman fight so many men at the same time? How does Batman do everything he does?
In this case, a detailed knowledge of the city and a few gadgets can make the trick. But since Batman is portrayed as a urban myth that might or might not be super-human, it would have been really stupid to show the secret behind the magic trick.
I don't like it. It looks like a non-intimidating man in a carnival suit.
I guess you imagined that carnival, right?
Then I hate when Batman is shot. It looks ridiculous.
On the contrary, it gives rise to his following "undead" kind of resurrection.
Then he throws the batarang at such a short distance (because in the dumb bulky suit you cannot run).
Pure speculation of yours. He used it to catch the thug, it is clearly shown. Running after him would have looked really normal for a supernatural being act. That thug saw Batman still and yet somehow he is being attracted to him. More terrifying it couldn't have been. A real triumph making Batman look like a supernatural monster to those two poor souls.
When he grabs the guy it doesn't get better because Keaton looks smaller than the man. It just doesn't look like he could be able to lift him.
Yet he did. Movie magic, a thing you have to embrace in order to enjoy them.
I know, nitpicking... but it comes of sloppy. Don't know. Burton was simply not able to shoot it more convincing. Perhaps a thing with technology. Sadly, the Batman scenes from Nolan are nothing else than people getting pushed away from Batman like punching balls.
Nitpicking, a little of speculation and a bit of 'I refuse to suspend my disbelief' can make a movie just a bunch of actors doing fake stuff.
The dress just doesn't fit the party.
You mean the Bruce Wayne party?
No. Doesn't impress me at all.
The voice is just the top. All his supernatural monster act is what makes the whisper so threatening.
I think they are both funny. Palance is really hamming it up. Intentional or not.
Palance sounded like Palance mpost of the time. Sure, he exaggerated his voice a few times.
I do not really know how anyone could have come up with such a characterization, especially in the 80s.
Following the character's story? I mean taking into account the things that happened to him as a child so they can portray him as the result of them. What I don't find compelling about the "classic" Bruce Wayne is how sometimes he just seems to be in complete control of what he does and think. Doesn't strike me as a boy whose parents were horribly and randomly killed in front of him. Because it's clear he hasn't got over that (he dresses as a bat) so it's only natural to assume that sad angry child is still there and probably not very skilled socially.
Well, they experience a lot with each other, he saves her life... Vicki Vale and Bruce Wayne don't have any connection like that. And of course, James Cameron sells it a lot better (look at the sex scene) but James Cameron is a vastly superior director.
Well, saving someone's life doesn't necessarily mean love (or many doctors would be the love of many lives), but it's all blurry when you try and rationalize the random, personal and chaotic process of falling in love.
It's clearly meant to look like a bat.
If it was to you, what can I say.