I love Batman & Robin and I wish Batman Triumphant was made in 1999 instead of the Nolan films. We could have had a neon Scarecrow with red eyes played by crazy Nicolas Cage and Harley Quinn played by Brittany Murphy. But instead we get Heath Ledger's "serious" take on the Joker. What a shame. Warner Bros. should give the series back to Schumacher! And release Batman Triumphant in 2016. Better late than never.
Yeah. Teh B&R is funniez.How can people not love this movie... it's so wonderfully absurd.
That's some subtle acting there. Nolan's Bane is all about exposition. He really beats you over the head with the imagery. By contrast, Schumacher's Bane could convey so much with just one word. When he said "step" you could really get a sense of the character's long history of pain, how every step in his life had been painful, and how he was going to step on Batman's skull and take over Gotham. And Tom Hardy had only his eyes to convey emotion with? Pfft. This Bane didn't even have that. I guess audiences just have to have everything spoon fed to them these days.
Heh. First time I had seen it. Just checking. Should have known given your B&R fandom.Oh i've seen it quite a few times. lol
Nolan and Arnold have the same birthday?
The irony is chilling.
I always loved Clooney's delivery of "She wants to kill you, Dick".
Not sure how successful I am, but earlier this week I recorded a video in which I speak my piece about actually defending Joel Schumacher's films.
I'll admit right now the video runs about 40 minutes and it's completely unprepared, it's just me talking. It's less a planned out analysis and more so a brainstorm but I think I get a number of my points across.
Here's the link to it:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x12mkhf_in-defense-of-joel-schumacher-s-batman_shortfilms?fbc=353
he was.Clooney could have been a terrific Batman in the right film.