Not at all. He was moving but still outpointing him with his jab. Garcia wasn't hitting him at all during the early rounds, so if you're saying he wasn't busy enough then how was Danny? Because he was swinging at air?
Considering the punch stats, which Danny won, and how many punches Peterson landed in the second half of the fight, Danny clearly landed plenty early. I know the stats aren't perfect, but they aren't complete crap.
No offense, but when people say this, it's one of the most ridiculous, revisionist history criticisms I've ever heard. Floyd has NEVER, I repeat, NEVER, been this runner that people have made him out to be. Against De La Hoya, early on, he was on his bike. It was the biggest fight of his life at that point and Oscar was damn near 160 pounds.
Against Maidana the second time he used more movement to show how easily he could beat him, but other than that, he's never been a guy that moved or "ran" that much in the ring. He's always been in the pocket and countering, this is factual. It's the whole reason he uses the shoulder roll in the first place, so that he can counter while still in range. It's aggravating because in every telecast they say the same thing "it's surprising how much Floyd is standing right in front of him" failing to realize they been saying the same thing since 2007. Before that, when he was younger, he wouldn't do anything but trade with people, and stand right there to do it.
I never said Floyd ran. Floyd has always set his feet and threw when he needed to. It is how he stops attacks. His straight right stopped Canelo in his tracks, and he was much bigger. When he was in the lower weights he blast people.
Floyd use to be all about the beautiful footwork, now he is way more about the upper body movement, and making people miss with it. Over the last few years, he fought back to the ropes a lot more. He will spend rounds laying on them, looking for a blow. It is like watching the difference between Ali before and after the suspension.
You also can't be serious with this. JMM is the best boxer Manny has ever fought, along with Morales (who he lost too as well) and it's exactly why he's had trouble with him and should've lost damn near all their fights.
There's no universe or planet though where JMM is a better overall boxer than De La Hoya, Cotto or Mosley, and I don't care at what point in their careers they fought Floyd. That's just blasphemy. I'm not so sure he was ever better than Castillo either, it's close.
Weight also had nothing to do with JMM's fight with Floyd, he just went up against someone who does what he does much better. That was after a year and half layoff Floyd took that fight, and he barely got touched.
Yes, I believe JMM is the best Manny ever fought. I say this as a Morales fanboy. Morales was a boss, and he was probably over the hill when Manny beat the hell out of him. But you can't get pistol whipped like that, and have bragging rights. I don't even know why you mention Oscar and Molsey when both were clearly done when they fought Manny. They were so bad at that point, it hurt.
JMM took on the best version of Manny and arguably beat him 3 times. I would say he definitely beat him in the third fight, and we all saw what he did in their last encounter.
JMM was never going to beat Floyd, the style match up was bad for him. Floyd is like a bigger, better version of him. JMM having to be the aggressor against the best counter fighter maybe in boxing history was never going to work. That being said, JMM came in fat. He moved up for the money, he didn't legit put on the weight.
I am curious how you rank Oscar over JMM as an all timer. Oscar lost all his big fights except for the one with Vargas. Floyd beat him, Trindad beat him, Mosley beat him, Hopkins beat him, Manny beat him. The same really applies to Cotto, who I love. Cotto's biggest win was against Shane. His two other big wins came against a guy with one eye and a dude with no legs. He lost to Trout for Godsake.