The Original Bamfer
Big, Bald and Beautiful
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2003
- Messages
- 42,637
- Reaction score
- 508
- Points
- 73
There's really nothing there for me to confidently say that that is Chatwin or it's not.
i was replying to kingpin who expressed that he/she hopes his hair is similar to the illustration he/she posted and i simply said that IF that's Chatwin in that picture then he probably won't have that kind of hair.Why does his hair need to be that big? Get over yourself, dude.
once again....proof please?I didn't say that. I said that it is not Chatwin.
and painting portraits makes you able to see a blurry face that's facing AWAY from the camera better than someone who's been working with photoshop for just as long?I've been painting portraits just as long.
good eye, wolvie.i dunno... it looks like chatwin to me
and painting portraits makes you able to see a blurry face that's facing AWAY from the camera better than someone who's been working with photoshop for just as long?
Dorky, it's not chatwin and that's that. Not going to listen to anymore of this unless someone gets some proof.

i was replying to kingpin who expressed that he/she hopes his hair is similar to the illustration he/she posted and i simply said that IF that's Chatwin in that picture then he probably won't have that kind of hair.
once again....proof please?
and painting portraits makes you able to see a blurry face that's facing AWAY from the camera better than someone who's been working with photoshop for just as long?
good eye, wolvie.
until there is proof, we can discuss. if you don't want to listen or discuss...that's fine.Dorky, it's not chatwin and that's that. Not going to listen to anymore of this unless someone gets some proof.
the hair looks similar, the ears, hair and jawline are too blurry to make a clear comparison.....but once again, they have very similar body structures and that's the biggest tell.Considering that guys hair, ear, and jawline are different than Chatwins.. yes.
proof please? i'm not saying it's DEFINITELY him, i'm saying.....based on Chatwin's body build and the build of that guy in the orange gi...it looks like Chatwin.
That guy's an extra, one of many in the same fruitloop cereal colored costume.
until there is proof, we can discuss. if you don't want to listen or discuss...that's fine.
the hair looks similar, the ears, hair and jawline are too blurry to make a clear comparison.....but once again, they have very similar body structures and that's the biggest tell.

Same. Some people can't be trusted with news.Starting to wish those lame cellphone pics hadn't even been taken.
JP, now you're just being ridiculous. we can see his clothes well enough to get a basic idea of the design but we don't have a good look at his face since it's facing away from the camera.Funny how it's just so impossible to tell that it doesn't look like Chatwin because it's a blurry image, but isn't blurry enough to not be able to distinguish the color and texture of the clothing, or lack-thereof.![]()
this whole thing started because i was telling kingpin that IF that is Chatwin, then his hair won't be like how kingpin was hoping it would.....then all of the sudden everyone started jumping on me about how it definitely isn't Chatwin. people here so damn touchy...Even if that is Goku, or if that is the same suit he'll be wearing - it won't look that way in the final product; the film. Items used in movies, costumes included, are made to look the best after proper editing, lighting, etc.
The quality of the images certainly doesn't help, either.
No one said Goku should be blackEven as a black guy, I would rather see Goku as a white guy.
*puts up flame shield*

Even as a black guy, I would rather see Goku as a white guy.
*puts up flame shield*